↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : CSR128^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 08:43:04 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.71s 1.34s
% Output   : Refutation 1.71s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : CSR128^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.17/0.35  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 05:47:46 EST 2026
% 0.17/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.35  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.29/0.47  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.29/0.47  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.29/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/0.47  % File     : CSR128^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.29/0.47  % Domain   : Commonsense Reasoning
% 0.29/0.47  % Problem  : Did Sue like someone in 2009?
% 0.29/0.47  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.29/0.47  % English  : During 2009, Mary likes Bill. During 2009, Sue liked everybody 
% 0.29/0.47  %            who was liked by Mary. Is it the case that Sue liked somebody 
% 0.29/0.47  %            during some time period?
% 0.29/0.47  
% 0.29/0.47  % Refs     : [Ben10] Benzmueller (2010), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.29/0.47  % Source   : [Ben10]
% 0.29/0.47  % Names    : ef_10.tq_SUMO_local [Ben10]
% 0.29/0.47  
% 0.29/0.47  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.29/0.47  % Rating   : 0.08 v9.1.0, 0.12 v9.0.0, 0.08 v8.2.0, 0.09 v8.1.0, 0.08 v7.4.0, 0.11 v7.3.0, 0.10 v7.2.0, 0.12 v7.1.0, 0.14 v7.0.0, 0.12 v6.4.0, 0.14 v6.3.0, 0.17 v6.2.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.50 v6.0.0, 0.17 v5.5.0, 0.20 v5.4.0, 0.25 v5.3.0, 0.50 v5.1.0, 0.75 v5.0.0, 0.50 v4.1.0
% 0.29/0.47  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   0 unt;   8 typ;   0 def)
% 0.29/0.47  %            Number of atoms       :    7 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.29/0.47  %            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
% 0.29/0.47  %            Number of connectives :   17 (   0   ~;   0   |;   0   &;  16   @)
% 0.29/0.47  %                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.29/0.47  %            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   5 avg)
% 0.29/0.47  %            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr)
% 0.29/0.47  %            Number of type conns  :    5 (   5   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.29/0.47  %            Number of symbols     :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.29/0.47  %            Number of variables   :    3 (   0   ^;   1   !;   2   ?;   3   :)
% 0.29/0.47  % SPC      : TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR
% 0.29/0.47  
% 0.29/0.47  % Comments : This is a simple test problem for reasoning in/about SUMO.
% 0.29/0.47  %            Initally the problem has been hand generated in KIF syntax in
% 0.29/0.47  %            SigmaKEE and then automatically translated by Benzmueller's
% 0.29/0.47  %            KIF2TH0 translator into THF syntax.
% 0.29/0.47  %          : The translation has been applied in two modes: local and SInE.
% 0.29/0.47  %            The local mode only translates the local assumptions and the
% 0.29/0.47  %            query. The SInE mode additionally translates the SInE-extract
% 0.29/0.47  %            of the loaded knowledge base (usually SUMO).
% 0.29/0.47  %          : The examples are selected to illustrate the benefits of
% 0.29/0.47  %            higher-order reasoning in ontology reasoning.
% 0.29/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/0.47  %----The extracted signature
% 0.29/0.47  thf(numbers,type,
% 0.29/0.47      num: $tType ).
% 0.29/0.47  
% 0.29/0.47  thf(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI,type,
% 0.29/0.47      holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o ).
% 0.29/0.47  
% 0.29/0.47  thf(lBill_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 0.29/0.47      lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 0.29/0.47  
% 0.29/0.47  thf(lMary_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 0.29/0.47      lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 0.29/0.47  
% 0.29/0.47  thf(lSue_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 0.29/0.47      lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 0.29/0.47  
% 0.29/0.47  thf(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI,type,
% 0.29/0.47      lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i ).
% 0.29/0.47  
% 0.29/0.47  thf(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI,type,
% 0.29/0.47      likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).
% 0.29/0.47  
% 0.29/0.47  thf(n2009_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 0.29/0.47      n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 0.29/0.47  
% 0.29/0.47  %----The translated axioms
% 0.29/0.47  thf(ax,axiom,
% 0.29/0.47      holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ).
% 0.29/0.47  
% 0.29/0.47  thf(ax_001,axiom,
% 0.29/0.47      ! [X: $i] :
% 0.29/0.47        ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
% 0.29/0.47        @ ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X )
% 0.29/0.47         => ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X ) ) ) ).
% 0.29/0.47  
% 0.29/0.47  %----The translated conjecture
% 0.29/0.47  thf(con,conjecture,
% 0.29/0.47      ? [T: $i,Z: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ T @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Z ) ) ).
% 0.29/0.47  
% 0.29/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/0.47  ------------------------
% 1.71/1.31  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.71/1.31  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.71/1.31  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 05:47:47 EST 2026
% 1.71/1.31  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.71/1.31  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.71/1.31  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.71/1.31  
% 1.71/1.31  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FXrVI2g04h/DTF2DTF26168.p
% 1.71/1.31  thf(numbers, type, num: $tType).
% 1.71/1.31  thf(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: ($i > ($o > $o))).
% 1.71/1.31  thf(lBill_THFTYPE_i, type, lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i).
% 1.71/1.31  thf(lMary_THFTYPE_i, type, lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i).
% 1.71/1.31  thf(lSue_THFTYPE_i, type, lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i).
% 1.71/1.31  thf(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI, type, lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: ($i > $i)).
% 1.71/1.31  thf(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: ($i > ($i > $o))).
% 1.71/1.31  thf(n2009_THFTYPE_i, type, n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i).
% 1.71/1.31  thf(ax, axiom, ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i)) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i) @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))).
% 1.71/1.31  thf(ax_001, axiom, (! [X:$i]: (((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i)) @ (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i) @ X) => ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i) @ X)))))).
% 1.71/1.31  thf(con, conjecture, (? [T:$i,Z:$i]: (((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ T) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i) @ Z))))).
% 1.71/1.31  % SZS output end ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FXrVI2g04h/DTF2DTF26168.p
% 1.71/1.31  ------------------------
% 1.71/1.32  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.71/1.32  thf(numbers,type,
% 1.71/1.32      num: $tType ).
% 1.71/1.32  
% 1.71/1.32  thf(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI,type,
% 1.71/1.32      holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o ).
% 1.71/1.32  
% 1.71/1.32  thf(lBill_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 1.71/1.32      lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 1.71/1.32  
% 1.71/1.32  thf(lMary_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 1.71/1.32      lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 1.71/1.32  
% 1.71/1.32  thf(lSue_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 1.71/1.32      lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 1.71/1.32  
% 1.71/1.32  thf(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI,type,
% 1.71/1.32      lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i ).
% 1.71/1.32  
% 1.71/1.32  thf(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI,type,
% 1.71/1.32      likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).
% 1.71/1.32  
% 1.71/1.32  thf(n2009_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 1.71/1.32      n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 1.71/1.32  
% 1.71/1.32  thf(ax,axiom,
% 1.71/1.32      holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ).
% 1.71/1.32  
% 1.71/1.32  thf(ax_001,axiom,
% 1.71/1.32      ! [X: $i] :
% 1.71/1.32        ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
% 1.71/1.32        @ ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X )
% 1.71/1.32         => ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X ) ) ) ).
% 1.71/1.32  
% 1.71/1.32  thf(con,conjecture,
% 1.71/1.32      ? [T: $i,Z: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ T @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Z ) ) ).
% 1.71/1.32  ------------------------
% 1.71/1.34  % (26282)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_26168 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 1.71/1.34  % (26283)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_26168 for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 1.71/1.34  % (26283)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.71/1.34  % (26283)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.34  % (26283)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.71/1.34  % (26283)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.71/1.34  % (26283)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.71/1.34  
% 1.71/1.34  % (26283)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.71/1.34  % (26283)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.71/1.34  % (26283)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 1.71/1.34  % (26283)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.34  % (26283)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.34  % (26282)First to succeed.
% 1.71/1.34  % (26282)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.71/1.34  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_26168
% 1.71/1.34  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_26168
% 1.71/1.34  thf(func_def_0, type, num: $tType).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(func_def_1, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(func_def_5, type, lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(func_def_6, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(func_def_13, type, ph1: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f102,plain,(
% 1.71/1.34    $false),
% 1.71/1.34    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f30,f40,f79,f101])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f101,plain,(
% 1.71/1.34    ~spl0_2),
% 1.71/1.34    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f100])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f100,plain,(
% 1.71/1.34    $false | ~spl0_2),
% 1.71/1.34    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f99,f15])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.71/1.34    ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($true != (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0)))) )),
% 1.71/1.34    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.71/1.34    ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : ($true != (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0)))),
% 1.71/1.34    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.71/1.34    ~? [X1 : $i,X0 : $i] : ($true = (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0)))),
% 1.71/1.34    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f8])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.71/1.34    ~? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0))),
% 1.71/1.34    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f4,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.71/1.34    ~? [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X2))),
% 1.71/1.34    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f3])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f3,conjecture,(
% 1.71/1.34    ? [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X2))),
% 1.71/1.34    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FXrVI2g04h/DTF2THF_26168.p',con)).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f99,plain,(
% 1.71/1.34    ($true = (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))) | ~spl0_2),
% 1.71/1.34    inference(boolean_simplification,[status(thm)],[f98])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f98,plain,(
% 1.71/1.34    ($true = (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ($true => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))) | ~spl0_2),
% 1.71/1.34    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f13,f26])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f26,plain,(
% 1.71/1.34    ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true) | ~spl0_2),
% 1.71/1.34    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f24])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f24,definition,(
% 1.71/1.34    spl0_2 <=> ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
% 1.71/1.34    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.71/1.34    ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0))) = $true)) )),
% 1.71/1.34    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.71/1.34    ! [X0 : $i] : ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0))) = $true)),
% 1.71/1.34    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.71/1.34    ! [X0 : $i] : (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0))),
% 1.71/1.34    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f2,axiom,(
% 1.71/1.34    ! [X0 : $i] : (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0))),
% 1.71/1.34    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FXrVI2g04h/DTF2THF_26168.p',ax_001)).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f79,plain,(
% 1.71/1.34    ~spl0_1),
% 1.71/1.34    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f78])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f78,plain,(
% 1.71/1.34    $false | ~spl0_1),
% 1.71/1.34    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f74,f49])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f49,plain,(
% 1.71/1.34    ( ! [X1 : $i] : (((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ $true) != $true)) ) | ~spl0_1),
% 1.71/1.34    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f15,f22])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f22,plain,(
% 1.71/1.34    ( ! [X1 : $i] : (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1) = $true)) ) | ~spl0_1),
% 1.71/1.34    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f21])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f21,definition,(
% 1.71/1.34    spl0_1 <=> ! [X1 : $i] : ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1) = $true)),
% 1.71/1.34    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f74,plain,(
% 1.71/1.34    ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true) = $true) | ~spl0_1),
% 1.71/1.34    inference(boolean_simplification,[status(thm)],[f61])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f61,plain,(
% 1.71/1.34    ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($true = (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X0) => $true)))) ) | ~spl0_1),
% 1.71/1.34    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f13,f22])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f40,plain,(
% 1.71/1.34    ~spl0_3),
% 1.71/1.34    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f39])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f39,plain,(
% 1.71/1.34    $false | ~spl0_3),
% 1.71/1.34    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f29])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f29,plain,(
% 1.71/1.34    ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) != X0)) ) | ~spl0_3),
% 1.71/1.34    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f28])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f28,definition,(
% 1.71/1.34    spl0_3 <=> ! [X0 : $i] : ((lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) != X0)),
% 1.71/1.34    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f30,plain,(
% 1.71/1.34    spl0_1 | spl0_2 | spl0_3),
% 1.71/1.34    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f18,f28,f24,f21])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f18,plain,(
% 1.71/1.34    ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1) = $true) | ((lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) != X0) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)) )),
% 1.71/1.34    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f17])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f17,plain,(
% 1.71/1.34    ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) != X0) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) != (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1))) )),
% 1.71/1.34    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f16])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.71/1.34    ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($true != $true) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) != (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1)) | ((lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) != X0)) )),
% 1.71/1.34    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f15,f14])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.71/1.34    ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) = $true)),
% 1.71/1.34    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.71/1.34    ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) = $true)),
% 1.71/1.34    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.71/1.34    (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),
% 1.71/1.34    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1])).
% 1.71/1.34  thf(f1,axiom,(
% 1.71/1.34    (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),
% 1.71/1.34    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FXrVI2g04h/DTF2THF_26168.p',ax)).
% 1.71/1.34  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_26168
% 1.71/1.34  % (26282)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.34  % (26282)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.71/1.34  % (26282)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.71/1.34  
% 1.71/1.34  % (26282)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.71/1.34  % (26282)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 1.71/1.34  % (26282)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 1.71/1.34  % (26282)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.34  % (26282)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.34  % (26281)Success in time 0.008 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------