%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : CSR128^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 07:46:55 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 4.66s 2.57s
% Output : Refutation 4.96s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 25 ( 6 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 81 ( 14 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 175 ( 24 ~; 11 |; 0 &; 133 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 5 avg)
% Number of types : 3 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 10 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 37 ( 0 ^; 31 !; 6 ?; 37 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(num_type,type,
num: $tType ).
thf(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI_decl,type,
holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o ).
thf(lBill_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(lMary_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(lSue_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI_decl,type,
lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i ).
thf(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI_decl,type,
likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(n2009_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(1,conjecture,
? [A: $i,B: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [A: $i,B: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ B ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(5,plain,
~ ? [A: $i,B: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
@ ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ A )
=> ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_001) ).
thf(8,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
@ ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ A )
=> ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(9,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
@ ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ A )
=> ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[8]) ).
thf(6,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ B ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[5]) ).
thf(60,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ $true
| ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
@ ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ A )
=> ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) ) )
!= ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ B @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ C ) ) ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[9,6]) ).
thf(61,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
@ ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ A )
=> ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) ) )
!= ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ B @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ C ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[60]) ).
thf(74,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
!= B )
| ( ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ A )
=> ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) )
!= ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ C ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[61]) ).
thf(78,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ A )
=> ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) )
!= ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ B ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[74]) ).
thf(3,axiom,
holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax) ).
thf(7,plain,
holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(10,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ $true
| ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) )
!= ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ B ) ) ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[7,6]) ).
thf(11,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) )
!= ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ B ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(12,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
!= A )
| ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ B )
!= ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
thf(13,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A )
!= ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
thf(14,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( lSue_THFTYPE_i != lMary_THFTYPE_i )
| ( A != lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
thf(17,plain,
lSue_THFTYPE_i != lMary_THFTYPE_i,
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
thf(16,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A )
| ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
thf(22,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ B @ $true )
| ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A )
!= ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ C ) ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[16,6]) ).
thf(23,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ $true ) ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[22:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( B )),bind(C,$thf( A ))]]) ).
thf(40,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ $true ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[23]) ).
thf(15,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A )
| ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
thf(171,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[5,78,6,9,13,17,7,16,40,8,15]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR128^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.10/0.21 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.21 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.21 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.21 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.21 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.21 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.21 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.21 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 17:50:52 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.22 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.22 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.99/0.80 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.17/0.99 % [INFO] Parsing done (184ms).
% 1.17/1.00 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 2.00/1.40 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 2.00/1.41 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 2.16/1.50 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 2 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 2.16/1.54 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 2 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 2.16/1.55 % [INFO] Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF).
% 2.16/1.55 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 2.16/1.55 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 4.66/2.56 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.66/2.57 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 4.66/2.57 % Time passed: 2206ms (effective reasoning time: 1557ms)
% 4.66/2.57 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.66/2.57 % Axioms used in derivation (2): ax_001, ax
% 4.66/2.57 % No. of inferences in proof: 25
% 4.66/2.57 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2206 ms resp. 1557 ms w/o parsing
% 4.96/2.60 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.96/2.60 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------