↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : CSR128_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:03:18 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.96s 2.87s
% Output   : Refutation 5.32s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (   6 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   81 (  14 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  175 (  24   ~;  11   |;   0   &; 133   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   37 (   0   ^;  31   !;   6   ?;  37   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(num_type,type,
    num: $tType ).

thf(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI_decl,type,
    holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o ).

thf(lBill_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lMary_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lSue_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI_decl,type,
    lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i ).

thf(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI_decl,type,
    likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(n2009_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ? [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) @ ( A @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) @ ( A @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ~ ? [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) @ ( A @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
       => ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
      @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_001) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
       => ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
      @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
       => ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
      @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[8]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ~ ( B @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) @ ( A @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[5]) ).

thf(60,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( ( A @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
           => ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
          @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) )
       != ( C @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) @ ( B @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[9,6]) ).

thf(61,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( A @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
         => ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
        @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) )
     != ( C @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) @ ( B @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[60]) ).

thf(74,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( A @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
         => ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
       != ( C @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
      | ( ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI )
       != B ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[61]) ).

thf(78,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
       => ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
     != ( B @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[74]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax) ).

thf(7,plain,
    lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) )
       != ( B @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) @ ( A @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[7,6]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) )
     != ( B @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) @ ( A @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
       != ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
      | ( ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI )
       != A ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
     != ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A != lBill_THFTYPE_i )
      | ( lSue_THFTYPE_i != lMary_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(17,plain,
    lSue_THFTYPE_i != lMary_THFTYPE_i,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
      | ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(22,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
       != ( C @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
      | ~ ( $true @ ( B @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) )
      | ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[16,6]) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( $true @ ( A @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) )
      | ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[22:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( B )),bind(C,$thf( A ))]]) ).

thf(40,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( $true @ ( A @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) )
      | ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[23]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
      | ~ ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(171,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[5,78,6,9,13,17,7,16,40,8,15]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : CSR128_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.13/0.39  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.39  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 01:15:54 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.39  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.89/0.98  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.28/1.17  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (184ms). 
% 1.28/1.18  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.01/1.60  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.01/1.61  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.18/1.72  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 2 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.18/1.76  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 2 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.18/1.76  % [INFO] 	 Problem is typed first-order (TPTP TFF). 
% 2.18/1.77  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.18/1.77  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 4.96/2.86  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.96/2.87  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 4.96/2.87  % Time passed: 2328ms (effective reasoning time: 1675ms)
% 4.96/2.87  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.96/2.87  % Axioms used in derivation (2): ax_001, ax
% 4.96/2.87  % No. of inferences in proof: 25
% 4.96/2.87  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2328 ms resp. 1675 ms w/o parsing
% 5.32/2.92  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.32/2.92  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------