↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : CSR129^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 07:46:55 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 12.53s 4.45s
% Output   : Refutation 12.53s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   20
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (  13 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   52 (  11 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  174 (  23   ~;   9   |;   9   &; 133   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   24 (  24   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   13 (  10 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   0   ^;   9   !;   3   ?;  12   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(num_type,type,
    num: $tType ).

thf(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI_decl,type,
    holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o ).

thf(instance_THFTYPE_IiioI_decl,type,
    instance_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(lBill_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lMary_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lMeasureFn_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    lMeasureFn_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lSue_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lTotalValuedRelation_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    lTotalValuedRelation_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI_decl,type,
    lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i ).

thf(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI_decl,type,
    likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(n2009_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(9,axiom,
    instance_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMeasureFn_THFTYPE_i @ lTotalValuedRelation_THFTYPE_i,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_036) ).

thf(73,plain,
    instance_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMeasureFn_THFTYPE_i @ lTotalValuedRelation_THFTYPE_i,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ? [A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
      @ ( ( A @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
        & ( A @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [A: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
        @ ( ( A @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
          & ( A @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(61,plain,
    ~ ? [A: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
        @ ( ( A @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
          & ( A @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(62,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
        @ ( ( A @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
          & ( A @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[61]) ).

thf(151,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
          @ ( $true
            & ( A @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) )
      | ( ( instance_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMeasureFn_THFTYPE_i @ lTotalValuedRelation_THFTYPE_i )
       != ( A @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[73,62]) ).

thf(152,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( A @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) )
      | ( ( instance_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMeasureFn_THFTYPE_i @ lTotalValuedRelation_THFTYPE_i )
       != ( A @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[151]) ).

thf(161,plain,
    ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( instance_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMeasureFn_THFTYPE_i @ lTotalValuedRelation_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(pre_uni,[status(thm)],[152:[bind(A,$thf( ^ [B: $i] : ^ [C: $i] : ( instance_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMeasureFn_THFTYPE_i @ lTotalValuedRelation_THFTYPE_i ) ))]]) ).

thf(169,plain,
    ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[161,73]) ).

thf(44,axiom,
    holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_005) ).

thf(121,plain,
    holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[44]) ).

thf(558,plain,
    ( ~ $true
    | ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) )
     != ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[121,169]) ).

thf(559,plain,
    ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) )
   != ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[558]) ).

thf(566,plain,
    ( ( ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
     != ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) )
    | ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[559]) ).

thf(574,plain,
    ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[566]) ).

thf(576,plain,
    holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false,
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[121,574]) ).

thf(581,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ~ $true
      | ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
          @ ( ( A @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
            & ( A @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) )
       != ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[576,62]) ).

thf(582,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
        @ ( ( A @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
          & ( A @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) )
     != ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[581]) ).

thf(588,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
       != ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) )
      | ( ( A @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
        & ( A @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[582]) ).

thf(592,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
         != ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) )
        | ( A @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) )
      & ( ( ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
         != ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) )
        | ( A @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[588]) ).

thf(593,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
       != ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) )
      | ( A @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[592]) ).

thf(595,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i > $o] : ( A @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[593]) ).

thf(602,plain,
    ~ $true,
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[169,595]) ).

thf(603,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[602]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : CSR129^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.11/0.21  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.21  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.21  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.21  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.21  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.21  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.21  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.21  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 17:57:41 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.22  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.22  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.05/0.80  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.59/1.06  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (256ms). 
% 1.59/1.08  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.30/1.46  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.30/1.47  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.49/1.59  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 64 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.66/1.69  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 58 axioms (removed 6 axioms). 
% 2.88/1.75  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.88/1.75  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.88/1.76  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 12.53/4.45  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 12.53/4.45  % Time passed: 4090ms (effective reasoning time: 3365ms)
% 12.53/4.45  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 12.53/4.45  % Axioms used in derivation (2): ax_036, ax_005
% 12.53/4.45  % No. of inferences in proof: 25
% 12.53/4.45  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 4090 ms resp. 3365 ms w/o parsing
% 12.53/4.49  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 12.53/4.49  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------