%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR130^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 07:46:36 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.08s 0.28s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.08s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 30 ( 3 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 113 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 12 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 405 ( 62 ~; 54 |; 26 &; 261 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 17 ( 7 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 16 ( 16 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 11 ( 9 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 31 ( 0 ^; 28 !; 3 ?; 31 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_29,type,
holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o ).
thf(decl_38,type,
lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(decl_43,type,
lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(decl_46,type,
lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(decl_53,type,
lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i ).
thf(decl_54,type,
likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_58,type,
n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(decl_69,type,
esk1_1: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i ).
thf(decl_70,type,
esk2_1: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i ).
thf(con,conjecture,
? [X33: $i > $i > $o] :
( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
@ ( ( X33 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
& ( X33 @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
& ~ ! [X34: $i,X35: $i] : ( X33 @ X34 @ X35 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.nx5lapHxvA/E---3.1_2996480.p',con) ).
thf(ax_005,axiom,
holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.nx5lapHxvA/E---3.1_2996480.p',ax_005) ).
thf(ax_003,axiom,
holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.nx5lapHxvA/E---3.1_2996480.p',ax_003) ).
thf(ax_008,axiom,
( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
@ ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.nx5lapHxvA/E---3.1_2996480.p',ax_008) ).
thf(ax_011,axiom,
! [X13: $i,X14: $o] :
( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X13 @ ~ X14 )
=> ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X13 @ X14 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.nx5lapHxvA/E---3.1_2996480.p',ax_011) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X33: $i > $i > $o] :
( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
@ ( ( X33 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
& ( X33 @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
& ~ ! [X34: $i,X35: $i] : ( X33 @ X34 @ X35 ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).
thf(c_0_6,axiom,
( ( ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) )
& ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ) ) ),
inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_005]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X33: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( ~ ( ( X33 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
& ( X33 @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
& ~ ! [X34: $i,X35: $i] : ( X33 @ X34 @ X35 ) )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) )
& ( ( ( X33 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
& ( X33 @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
& ~ ! [X34: $i,X35: $i] : ( X33 @ X34 @ X35 ) )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ) ) ),
inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
thf(c_0_8,plain,
( ( ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) )
& ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
! [X39: $i > $i > $o,X42: $i,X43: $i] :
( ( ~ ( X39 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( X39 @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ( X39 @ X42 @ X43 )
| ( X39 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) )
& ( ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false )
| ( X39 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) )
& ( ~ ( X39 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( X39 @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ( X39 @ X42 @ X43 )
| ( X39 @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) )
& ( ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false )
| ( X39 @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) )
& ( ~ ( X39 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( X39 @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ( X39 @ X42 @ X43 )
| ~ ( X39 @ ( esk1_1 @ X39 ) @ ( esk2_1 @ X39 ) ) )
& ( ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false )
| ~ ( X39 @ ( esk1_1 @ X39 ) @ ( esk2_1 @ X39 ) ) )
& ( ~ ( X39 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( X39 @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ( X39 @ X42 @ X43 )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) )
& ( ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_10,plain,
( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true )
| ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
thf(c_0_11,plain,
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ~ $true ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
! [X33: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( X33 @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ~ $true ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
thf(c_0_13,plain,
( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ~ $true )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
! [X33: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true )
| ( X33 @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
thf(c_0_15,axiom,
( ( ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) )
& ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ) ) ),
inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_003]) ).
thf(c_0_16,plain,
( ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) )
& ( ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_008])]) ).
thf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X33: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( X33 @ X1 @ X2 )
| ~ ( X33 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( X33 @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
thf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_14]) ).
thf(c_0_19,plain,
( ( ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) )
& ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
thf(c_0_20,plain,
! [X13: $i,X14: $o] :
( ( ( X14
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X13 @ $true ) )
& ( ~ X14
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X13 @ $false ) ) )
=> ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X13 @ X14 ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_011])]) ).
thf(c_0_21,plain,
( ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) )
& ( ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
thf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X33: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( X33 @ X1 @ X2 )
| ~ ( X33 @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( X33 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18])]) ).
thf(c_0_23,plain,
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ~ $true ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
thf(c_0_24,plain,
! [X44: $i,X45: $o] :
( ( X45
| ~ X45
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X44 @ X45 ) )
& ( ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X44 @ $false )
| ~ X45
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X44 @ X45 ) )
& ( X45
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X44 @ $true )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X44 @ X45 ) )
& ( ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X44 @ $false )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X44 @ $true )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X44 @ X45 ) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_25,plain,
( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ~ $true )
| ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
thf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ~ $true )
| ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_11]) ).
thf(c_0_27,plain,
! [X1: $i] :
( ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ $true )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ ~ $true ) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24])])]) ).
thf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ~ $true,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
thf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_18])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR130^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.19 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.19 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.19 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.19 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.19 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.19 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.19 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.19 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 17:55:15 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.19 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.19 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.23 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.25 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.nx5lapHxvA/E---3.1_2996480.p
% 0.08/0.28 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.08/0.28 % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNSSA.
% 0.08/0.28 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.28 % Starting new_ho_10_unif with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.08/0.28 % Starting sh3l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.28 % Starting new_ho_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.28 % Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.28 % sh3l with pid 2996494 completed with status 0
% 0.08/0.28 % Result found by sh3l
% 0.08/0.28 % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNSSA.
% 0.08/0.28 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.28 % Starting new_ho_10_unif with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.08/0.28 % Starting sh3l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.28 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000)
% 0.08/0.28 % SinE strategy is gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000
% 0.08/0.28 % Search class: HGHNF-FFSM11-SSSFFSBN
% 0.08/0.28 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.08/0.28 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.28 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2996497 completed with status 0
% 0.08/0.28 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.08/0.28 % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNSSA.
% 0.08/0.28 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.28 % Starting new_ho_10_unif with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.08/0.28 % Starting sh3l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.28 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000)
% 0.08/0.28 % SinE strategy is gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000
% 0.08/0.28 % Search class: HGHNF-FFSM11-SSSFFSBN
% 0.08/0.28 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.08/0.28 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.28 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.08/0.28
% 0.08/0.28 % Proof found!
% 0.08/0.28 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.08/0.28 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.08/0.28 % Parsed axioms : 112
% 0.08/0.28 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 104
% 0.08/0.28 % Initial clauses : 24
% 0.08/0.28 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 0.08/0.28 % Initial clauses in saturation : 21
% 0.08/0.28 % Processed clauses : 25
% 0.08/0.28 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.08/0.28 % ...subsumed : 9
% 0.08/0.28 % ...remaining for further processing : 16
% 0.08/0.28 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.08/0.28 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.08/0.28 % Backward-subsumed : 3
% 0.08/0.28 % Backward-rewritten : 9
% 0.08/0.28 % Generated clauses : 12
% 0.08/0.28 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 12
% 0.08/0.28 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.08/0.28 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.08/0.28 % Paramodulations : 12
% 0.08/0.28 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.08/0.28 % NegExts : 0
% 0.08/0.28 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.08/0.28 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.08/0.28 % Total rewrite steps : 11
% 0.08/0.28 % ...of those cached : 9
% 0.08/0.28 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.08/0.28 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.08/0.28 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.08/0.28 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.08/0.28 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.08/0.28 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.08/0.28 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.28 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.28 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.28 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.28 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.28 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.28 % Current number of processed clauses : 4
% 0.08/0.28 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.08/0.28 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.08/0.28 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.08/0.28 % Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.08/0.28 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
% 0.08/0.28 % ...number of literals in the above : 7
% 0.08/0.28 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.08/0.28 % Current number of archived clauses : 12
% 0.08/0.28 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 13
% 0.08/0.28 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13
% 0.08/0.28 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 12
% 0.08/0.28 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.08/0.28 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.08/0.28 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.08/0.28 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.08/0.28 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.08/0.28 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.08/0.28 % Termbank termtop insertions : 2199
% 0.08/0.28 % Search garbage collected termcells : 480
% 0.08/0.28
% 0.08/0.28 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.08/0.28 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.08/0.28 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.08/0.28 % Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.08/0.28 % Maximum resident set size: 3728 pages
% 0.08/0.28
% 0.08/0.28 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.08/0.28 % User time : 0.007 s
% 0.08/0.28 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.08/0.28 % Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.08/0.28 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.08/0.28 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------