%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR133^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 07:46:36 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.22s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 29 ( 8 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 103 ( 15 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 18 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 305 ( 47 ~; 41 |; 22 &; 195 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 17 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 30 ( 30 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 12 ( 9 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 4 ^; 15 !; 9 ?; 28 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_23,type,
holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o ).
thf(decl_24,type,
lAnna_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(decl_26,type,
lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(decl_27,type,
lBob_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(decl_28,type,
lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(decl_29,type,
lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(decl_30,type,
lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i ).
thf(decl_31,type,
likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_32,type,
n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(con,conjecture,
? [X1: $i > $i > $o,X2: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i] :
( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
@ ( ( X2 @ X3 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
& ( X1 @ X3 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
& ( X2 != X1 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tShkeZHl4z/E---3.1_3208944.p',con) ).
thf(ax_004,axiom,
holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tShkeZHl4z/E---3.1_3208944.p',ax_004) ).
thf(ax_003,axiom,
holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tShkeZHl4z/E---3.1_3208944.p',ax_003) ).
thf(ax_009,axiom,
( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
@ ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tShkeZHl4z/E---3.1_3208944.p',ax_009) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1: $i > $i > $o,X2: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i] :
( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
@ ( ( X2 @ X3 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
& ( X1 @ X3 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
& ( X2 != X1 ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1: $i > $i > $o,X2: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i] :
( ( ~ ( ( X2 @ X3 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
& ( X1 @ X3 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
& ( X2 != X1 ) )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) )
& ( ( ( X2 @ X3 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
& ( X1 @ X3 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
& ( X2 != X1 ) )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]) ).
thf(c_0_6,axiom,
( ( ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) )
& ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ) ) ),
inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_004]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
! [X7: $i > $i > $o,X8: $i > $i > $o,X9: $i] :
( ( ~ ( X8 @ X9 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( X7 @ X9 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
| ( X8 = X7 )
| ( X8 @ X9 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) )
& ( ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false )
| ( X8 @ X9 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) )
& ( ~ ( X8 @ X9 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( X7 @ X9 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
| ( X8 = X7 )
| ( X7 @ X9 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i ) )
& ( ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false )
| ( X7 @ X9 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i ) )
& ( ~ ( X8 @ X9 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( X7 @ X9 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
| ( X8 = X7 )
| ( X8 != X7 ) )
& ( ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false )
| ( X8 != X7 ) )
& ( ~ ( X8 @ X9 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( X7 @ X9 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
| ( X8 = X7 )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) )
& ( ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_8,plain,
( ( ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) )
& ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X2: $i > $i > $o] :
( ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ~ $true )
| ( X1 != X2 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
thf(c_0_10,plain,
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ~ $true ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ~ $true ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
thf(c_0_12,plain,
( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true )
| ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
thf(c_0_13,plain,
likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
thf(c_0_14,axiom,
( ( ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) )
& ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ) ) ),
inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_003]) ).
thf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X2: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i] :
( ( X1 = X2 )
| ~ ( X1 @ X3 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( X2 @ X3 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
thf(c_0_16,plain,
holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13])]) ).
thf(c_0_17,plain,
( ( ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) )
& ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
thf(c_0_18,plain,
( ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) )
& ( ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_009])]) ).
thf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X2: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i] :
( ( X1 = X2 )
| ~ ( X2 @ X3 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( X1 @ X3 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16])]) ).
thf(c_0_20,plain,
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ~ $true ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
thf(c_0_21,plain,
( ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) )
& ( ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
thf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i] :
( ( X1
= ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : $true ) )
| ~ ( X1 @ X3 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
thf(c_0_23,plain,
likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_11]) ).
thf(c_0_24,plain,
( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ~ $true )
| ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
thf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : $true )
= likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
thf(c_0_26,plain,
~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_11]) ).
thf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i,X6: $i] : ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X3 @ X6 ),
inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
thf(c_0_28,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : CSR133^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.14 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.14 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.14 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.14 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.14 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.14 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.14 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.14 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 17:56:03 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.14 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.14 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.18 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.19 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tShkeZHl4z/E---3.1_3208944.p
% 0.12/0.22 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.12/0.22 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSN.
% 0.12/0.22 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.22 % Starting new_ho_11 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.22 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.22 % Starting new_ho_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.22 % Starting ho_unfolding_4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.22 % new_ho_11 with pid 3208957 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.22 % Result found by new_ho_11
% 0.12/0.22 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSN.
% 0.12/0.22 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.22 % Starting new_ho_11 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.22 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.12/0.22 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.22 % Search class: HGHSF-FFSM11-SSSFFSBN
% 0.12/0.22 % partial match(1): HGHSF-FFSF11-SSSFFSBN
% 0.12/0.22 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.12/0.22 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.22 % Starting new_ho_11 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.22 % Starting ehoh_best2_full with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.22 % Starting sh2lt with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.22 % Starting sh2l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.22 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3208961 completed with status 10
% 0.12/0.22 % Starting lpo1_def_fix with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.22 % lpo1_def_fix with pid 3208969 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.22 % Result found by lpo1_def_fix
% 0.12/0.22 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSN.
% 0.12/0.22 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.22 % Starting new_ho_11 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.22 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.12/0.22 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.22 % Search class: HGHSF-FFSM11-SSSFFSBN
% 0.12/0.22 % partial match(1): HGHSF-FFSF11-SSSFFSBN
% 0.12/0.22 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.12/0.22 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.22 % Starting new_ho_11 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.22 % Starting ehoh_best2_full with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.22 % Starting sh2lt with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.22 % Starting sh2l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.22 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3208961 completed with status 10
% 0.12/0.22 % Starting lpo1_def_fix with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.22 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.22 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.22
% 0.12/0.22 % Proof found!
% 0.12/0.22 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/0.22 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.22 % Parsed axioms : 23
% 0.12/0.22 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.12/0.22 % Initial clauses : 40
% 0.12/0.22 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 15
% 0.12/0.22 % Initial clauses in saturation : 25
% 0.12/0.22 % Processed clauses : 43
% 0.12/0.22 % ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.12/0.22 % ...subsumed : 2
% 0.12/0.22 % ...remaining for further processing : 39
% 0.12/0.22 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 5
% 0.12/0.22 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.12/0.22 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.12/0.22 % Backward-rewritten : 13
% 0.12/0.22 % Generated clauses : 30
% 0.12/0.22 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 24
% 0.12/0.22 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.22 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.12/0.22 % Paramodulations : 6
% 0.12/0.22 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.12/0.22 % NegExts : 0
% 0.12/0.22 % Equation resolutions : 5
% 0.12/0.22 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.12/0.22 % Total rewrite steps : 16
% 0.12/0.22 % ...of those cached : 9
% 0.12/0.22 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.12/0.22 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.12/0.22 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.22 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.22 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.22 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.12/0.22 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.22 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.22 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.22 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.22 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.22 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.22 % Current number of processed clauses : 11
% 0.12/0.22 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.12/0.22 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.22 % Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.12/0.22 % Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.12/0.22 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 17
% 0.12/0.22 % ...number of literals in the above : 39
% 0.12/0.22 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.12/0.22 % Current number of archived clauses : 27
% 0.12/0.22 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 27
% 0.12/0.22 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 27
% 0.12/0.22 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.12/0.22 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.12/0.22 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.12/0.22 % BW rewrite match attempts : 8
% 0.12/0.22 % BW rewrite match successes : 7
% 0.12/0.22 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.12/0.22 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.12/0.22 % Termbank termtop insertions : 2017
% 0.12/0.22 % Search garbage collected termcells : 144
% 0.12/0.22
% 0.12/0.22 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.22 % User time : 0.007 s
% 0.12/0.22 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.12/0.22 % Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.12/0.22 % Maximum resident set size: 3644 pages
% 0.12/0.22
% 0.12/0.22 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.22 % User time : 0.023 s
% 0.12/0.22 % System time : 0.016 s
% 0.12/0.22 % Total time : 0.039 s
% 0.12/0.22 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.12/0.22 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------