↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : CSR135^2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 07:46:51 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.45s 3.66s
% Output   : Proof 3.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem    : CSR135^2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime   : Thu Oct  2 19:47:08 EDT 2025
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.45/3.66  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.45/3.66  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.45/3.66  Clause #6 (by assumption #[]): Eq (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lAnna_THFTYPE_i) True
% 3.45/3.66  Clause #7 (by assumption #[]): Eq (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI lMary_THFTYPE_i lAnna_THFTYPE_i) True
% 3.45/3.66  Clause #8 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (Exists fun R => And (R lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) (R lMary_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i))) True
% 3.45/3.66  Clause #10 (by clausification #[8]): Eq (Exists fun R => And (R lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) (R lMary_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i)) False
% 3.45/3.66  Clause #11 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a : Iota → Iota → Prop), Eq (And (a lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) (a lMary_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i)) False
% 3.45/3.66  Clause #12 (by clausification #[11]): ∀ (a : Iota → Iota → Prop),
% 3.45/3.66    Or (Eq (a lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) False) (Eq (a lMary_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) False)
% 3.45/3.66  Clause #27 (by superposition #[12, 6]): Or (Eq ((fun x x_1 => parent_THFTYPE_IiioI x lAnna_THFTYPE_i) lMary_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) False) (Eq False True)
% 3.45/3.66  Clause #28 (by betaEtaReduce #[27]): Or (Eq (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI lMary_THFTYPE_i lAnna_THFTYPE_i) False) (Eq False True)
% 3.45/3.66  Clause #29 (by clausification #[28]): Eq (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI lMary_THFTYPE_i lAnna_THFTYPE_i) False
% 3.45/3.66  Clause #30 (by superposition #[29, 7]): Eq False True
% 3.45/3.66  Clause #36 (by clausification #[30]): False
% 3.45/3.66  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------