↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : CSR139^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 08:43:07 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.68s 1.44s
% Output   : Refutation 1.68s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   20
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  16 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  163 (  48 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  122 (  30   ~;  14   |;   8   &;  70   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   36 (  36   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   46 (  14   ^;  20   !;  12   ?;  46   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_0,type,
    num: $tType ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    parent_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_15,type,
    ph1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(f162,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f161]) ).

thf(f161,plain,
    $false = $true,
    inference(boolean_simplification,[status(thm)],[f154]) ).

thf(f154,plain,
    ( ( ~ $true ) = $true ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f42,f151]) ).

thf(f151,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X2 )
      = $true ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f150]) ).

thf(f150,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] : $true
        @ X2 )
      = ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(argument_congruence,[status(thm)],[f146]) ).

thf(f146,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 )
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i] : $true ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f143]) ).

thf(f143,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 )
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] : $true
        @ X1 ) ),
    inference(argument_congruence,[status(thm)],[f105]) ).

thf(f105,plain,
    ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] : $true ) ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f81,f88]) ).

thf(f88,plain,
    likes_THFTYPE_IiioI = parent_THFTYPE_IiioI,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f77]) ).

thf(f77,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI = parent_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f56,f37]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f31]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
    = $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f30]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i,
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3]) ).

thf(f3,axiom,
    likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RcS1H2SaOu/DTF2THF_16606.p',ax_002) ).

thf(f56,plain,
    ! [X0: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( X0 @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) )
      | ( parent_THFTYPE_IiioI = X0 ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f50]) ).

thf(f50,plain,
    ! [X0: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( $true != $true )
      | ( parent_THFTYPE_IiioI = X0 )
      | ( $true
       != ( X0 @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f44,f39]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ( ( parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( ( parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
    = $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i,
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,axiom,
    parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RcS1H2SaOu/DTF2THF_16606.p',ax_008) ).

thf(f44,plain,
    ! [X2: $i > $i > $o,X0: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( X2 @ X0 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
       != $true )
      | ( X1 = X2 )
      | ( ( X1 @ X0 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f43]) ).

thf(f43,plain,
    ! [X2: $i > $i > $o,X0: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( X1 @ X0 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
       != $true )
      | ( $true
        = ( X1 = X2 ) )
      | ( ( X2 @ X0 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f41]) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ! [X2: $i > $i > $o,X0: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( X2 @ X0 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
       != $true )
      | ( ( X1 @ X0 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
       != $true )
      | ( ( X1 != X2 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f36]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o,X2: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( X1 @ X0 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
       != $true )
      | ( ( X1 != X2 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( X2 @ X0 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f29]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ~ ? [X0: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o,X2: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ( ( X1 @ X0 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
          = $true )
        & ( ( X1 != X2 )
          = $true )
        & ( ( X2 @ X0 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
          = $true ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f28]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ~ ? [X0: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o,X2: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ( X1 != X2 )
        & ( X1 @ X0 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
        & ( X2 @ X0 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X2: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o,X0: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ( X0 != X1 )
        & ( X1 @ X2 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
        & ( X0 @ X2 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,conjecture,
    ? [X2: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o,X0: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( X0 != X1 )
      & ( X1 @ X2 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
      & ( X0 @ X2 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RcS1H2SaOu/DTF2THF_16606.p',con) ).

thf(f81,plain,
    ( parent_THFTYPE_IiioI
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] : $true ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f80]) ).

thf(f80,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( parent_THFTYPE_IiioI
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] : $true ) ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f74]) ).

thf(f74,plain,
    ( ( parent_THFTYPE_IiioI
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] : $true ) )
    | ( ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] : $true
        @ lMary_THFTYPE_i
        @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
     != $true ) ),
    inference(primitive_instantiation,[status(thm)],[f56]) ).

thf(f42,plain,
    ( ( ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f25]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ( ( ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f24]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,axiom,
    ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RcS1H2SaOu/DTF2THF_16606.p',ax_001) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : CSR139^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.16/0.34  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 05:51:16 EST 2026
% 0.19/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.36  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.30/0.48  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.30/0.48  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.30/0.48  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/0.48  % File     : CSR139^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.30/0.48  % Domain   : Commonsense Reasoning
% 0.30/0.48  % Problem  : Different feelings from people to Bill and Anna
% 0.30/0.48  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.30/0.48  % English  : Do there exists different relations ?R and ?Q so that ?R holds 
% 0.30/0.48  %            between a person ?Y and Bill and ?Q between ?Y and Anna.
% 0.30/0.48  
% 0.30/0.48  % Refs     : [Ben10] Benzmueller (2010), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.30/0.48  % Source   : [Ben10]
% 0.30/0.48  % Names    : rv_5.tq_SUMO_local [Ben10]
% 0.30/0.48  
% 0.30/0.48  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.30/0.48  % Rating   : 0.11 v9.1.0, 0.12 v9.0.0, 0.10 v8.2.0, 0.23 v8.1.0, 0.18 v7.5.0, 0.14 v7.4.0, 0.11 v7.2.0, 0.00 v7.1.0, 0.12 v7.0.0, 0.14 v6.4.0, 0.17 v6.3.0, 0.20 v6.2.0, 0.14 v6.1.0, 0.57 v6.0.0, 0.14 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.4.0, 0.20 v5.3.0, 0.40 v5.0.0, 0.60 v4.1.0
% 0.30/0.48  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (   7 unt;   9 typ;   0 def)
% 0.30/0.48  %            Number of atoms       :   15 (   1 equ;   4 cnn)
% 0.30/0.48  %            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.30/0.48  %            Number of connectives :   34 (   4   ~;   0   |;   2   &;  28   @)
% 0.30/0.48  %                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.30/0.48  %            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
% 0.30/0.48  %            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr)
% 0.30/0.48  %            Number of type conns  :    8 (   8   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.30/0.48  %            Number of symbols     :   10 (   8 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.30/0.48  %            Number of variables   :    3 (   0   ^;   0   !;   3   ?;   3   :)
% 0.30/0.48  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.30/0.48  
% 0.30/0.48  % Comments : This is a simple test problem for reasoning in/about SUMO.
% 0.30/0.48  %            Initally the problem has been hand generated in KIF syntax in
% 0.30/0.48  %            SigmaKEE and then automatically translated by Benzmueller's
% 0.30/0.48  %            KIF2TH0 translator into THF syntax.
% 0.30/0.48  %          : The translation has been applied in two modes: local and SInE.
% 0.30/0.48  %            The local mode only translates the local assumptions and the
% 0.30/0.48  %            query. The SInE mode additionally translates the SInE-extract
% 0.30/0.48  %            of the loaded knowledge base (usually SUMO).
% 0.30/0.48  %          : The examples are selected to illustrate the benefits of
% 0.30/0.48  %            higher-order reasoning in ontology reasoning.
% 0.30/0.48  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/0.48  %----The extracted signature
% 0.30/0.48  thf(numbers,type,
% 0.30/0.48      num: $tType ).
% 0.30/0.48  
% 0.30/0.48  thf(lAnna_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 0.30/0.48      lAnna_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 0.30/0.48  
% 0.30/0.48  thf(lBen_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 0.30/0.48      lBen_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 0.30/0.48  
% 0.30/0.48  thf(lBill_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 0.30/0.48      lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 0.30/0.48  
% 0.30/0.48  thf(lBob_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 0.30/0.48      lBob_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 0.30/0.48  
% 0.30/0.48  thf(lMary_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 0.30/0.48      lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 0.30/0.48  
% 0.30/0.48  thf(lSue_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 0.30/0.48      lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 0.30/0.48  
% 0.30/0.48  thf(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI,type,
% 0.30/0.48      likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).
% 0.30/0.48  
% 0.30/0.48  thf(parent_THFTYPE_IiioI,type,
% 0.30/0.48      parent_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).
% 0.30/0.48  
% 0.30/0.48  %----The translated axioms
% 0.30/0.48  thf(ax,axiom,
% 0.30/0.48      likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ).
% 0.30/0.48  
% 0.30/0.48  thf(ax_001,axiom,
% 0.30/0.48      (~) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i ) ).
% 0.30/0.48  
% 0.30/0.48  thf(ax_002,axiom,
% 0.30/0.48      likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ).
% 0.30/0.48  
% 0.30/0.48  thf(ax_003,axiom,
% 0.30/0.48      parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBen_THFTYPE_i ).
% 0.30/0.48  
% 0.30/0.48  thf(ax_004,axiom,
% 0.30/0.48      parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBen_THFTYPE_i ).
% 0.30/0.48  
% 0.30/0.48  thf(ax_005,axiom,
% 0.30/0.48      (~) @ ( parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBen_THFTYPE_i ) ).
% 0.30/0.48  
% 0.30/0.48  thf(ax_006,axiom,
% 0.30/0.48      likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ).
% 0.30/0.48  
% 0.30/0.48  thf(ax_007,axiom,
% 0.30/0.48      parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i ).
% 0.30/0.48  
% 0.30/0.48  thf(ax_008,axiom,
% 0.30/0.48      parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i ).
% 0.30/0.48  
% 0.30/0.48  thf(ax_009,axiom,
% 0.30/0.48      (~) @ ( parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i ) ).
% 0.30/0.48  
% 0.30/0.48  %----The translated conjecture
% 0.30/0.48  thf(con,conjecture,
% 0.30/0.48      ? [Q: $i > $i > $o,R: $i > $i > $o,Y: $i] :
% 0.30/0.48        ( ( R @ Y @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
% 0.30/0.48        & ( Q @ Y @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
% 0.30/0.48        & ( (~) @ ( R = Q ) ) ) ).
% 0.30/0.48  
% 0.30/0.48  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/0.48  ------------------------
% 1.68/1.40  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.68/1.40  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.68/1.40  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 05:51:17 EST 2026
% 1.68/1.40  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.68/1.40  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.68/1.40  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.68/1.40  
% 1.68/1.40  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RcS1H2SaOu/DTF2DTF16606.p
% See solution above
% 1.68/1.40  ------------------------
% 1.68/1.41  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.68/1.41  thf(numbers,type,
% 1.68/1.41      num: $tType ).
% 1.68/1.41  
% 1.68/1.41  thf(lAnna_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 1.68/1.41      lAnna_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 1.68/1.41  
% 1.68/1.41  thf(lBen_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 1.68/1.41      lBen_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 1.68/1.41  
% 1.68/1.41  thf(lBill_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 1.68/1.41      lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 1.68/1.41  
% 1.68/1.41  thf(lBob_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 1.68/1.41      lBob_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 1.68/1.41  
% 1.68/1.41  thf(lMary_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 1.68/1.41      lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 1.68/1.41  
% 1.68/1.41  thf(lSue_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 1.68/1.41      lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 1.68/1.41  
% 1.68/1.41  thf(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI,type,
% 1.68/1.41      likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).
% 1.68/1.41  
% 1.68/1.41  thf(parent_THFTYPE_IiioI,type,
% 1.68/1.41      parent_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).
% 1.68/1.41  
% 1.68/1.41  thf(ax,axiom,
% 1.68/1.41      likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ).
% 1.68/1.41  
% 1.68/1.41  thf(ax_001,axiom,
% 1.68/1.41      (~) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i ) ).
% 1.68/1.41  
% 1.68/1.41  thf(ax_002,axiom,
% 1.68/1.41      likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ).
% 1.68/1.41  
% 1.68/1.41  thf(ax_003,axiom,
% 1.68/1.41      parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBen_THFTYPE_i ).
% 1.68/1.41  
% 1.68/1.41  thf(ax_004,axiom,
% 1.68/1.41      parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBen_THFTYPE_i ).
% 1.68/1.41  
% 1.68/1.41  thf(ax_005,axiom,
% 1.68/1.41      (~) @ ( parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBen_THFTYPE_i ) ).
% 1.68/1.41  
% 1.68/1.41  thf(ax_006,axiom,
% 1.68/1.41      likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ).
% 1.68/1.41  
% 1.68/1.41  thf(ax_007,axiom,
% 1.68/1.41      parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i ).
% 1.68/1.41  
% 1.68/1.41  thf(ax_008,axiom,
% 1.68/1.41      parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i ).
% 1.68/1.41  
% 1.68/1.41  thf(ax_009,axiom,
% 1.68/1.41      (~) @ ( parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i ) ).
% 1.68/1.41  
% 1.68/1.41  thf(con,conjecture,
% 1.68/1.41      ? [Q: $i > $i > $o,R: $i > $i > $o,Y: $i] :
% 1.68/1.41        ( ( R @ Y @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
% 1.68/1.41        & ( Q @ Y @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
% 1.68/1.41        & ( (~) @ ( R = Q ) ) ) ).
% 1.68/1.41  ------------------------
% 1.68/1.43  % (16703)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_16606 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 1.68/1.43  % (16706)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_16606 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.68/1.43  % (16704)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_16606 for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 1.68/1.43  % (16705)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_16606 for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 1.68/1.43  % (16707)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_16606 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.68/1.43  % (16708)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_16606 for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 1.68/1.43  % (16709)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_16606 for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 1.68/1.43  % (16706)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.68/1.43  % (16706)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.43  % (16706)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.68/1.43  % (16706)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.68/1.43  % (16707)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.68/1.43  % (16707)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.43  % (16707)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.68/1.43  % (16706)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.68/1.43  
% 1.68/1.43  % (16706)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.68/1.43  % (16706)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.68/1.43  % (16706)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.68/1.43  % (16706)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.43  % (16706)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.43  % (16707)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.68/1.43  % (16707)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.68/1.43  
% 1.68/1.43  % (16707)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.68/1.43  % (16707)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.68/1.43  % (16707)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 1.68/1.43  % (16707)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.43  % (16707)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.43  % (16704)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.68/1.43  % (16704)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.43  % (16704)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.68/1.43  % (16704)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.68/1.43  % (16704)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.68/1.43  
% 1.68/1.43  % (16704)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.68/1.43  % (16704)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.68/1.43  % (16704)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 1.68/1.43  % (16704)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.43  % (16704)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.44  % (16708)First to succeed.
% 1.68/1.44  % (16705)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.68/1.44  % (16705)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.44  % (16705)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.68/1.44  % (16705)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.68/1.44  
% 1.68/1.44  
% 1.68/1.44  % (16705)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.68/1.44  % (16705)Time elapsed: 0.009 s
% 1.68/1.44  % (16705)Instructions burned: 13 (million)
% 1.68/1.44  % (16705)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.44  % (16705)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.44  % (16708)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.68/1.44  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_16606
% 1.68/1.44  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_16606
% 1.68/1.44  thf(func_def_0, type, num: $tType).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(func_def_7, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(func_def_8, type, parent_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(func_def_15, type, ph1: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f162,plain,(
% 1.68/1.44    $false),
% 1.68/1.44    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f161])).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f161,plain,(
% 1.68/1.44    ($false = $true)),
% 1.68/1.44    inference(boolean_simplification,[status(thm)],[f154])).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f154,plain,(
% 1.68/1.44    ((~ $true) = $true)),
% 1.68/1.44    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f42,f151])).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f151,plain,(
% 1.68/1.44    ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X2) = $true)) )),
% 1.68/1.44    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f150])).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f150,plain,(
% 1.68/1.44    ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : ((((^[Y0 : $i]: ($true)) @ X2) = (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X2))) )),
% 1.68/1.44    inference(argument_congruence,[status(thm)],[f146])).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f146,plain,(
% 1.68/1.44    ( ! [X1 : $i] : (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1) = (^[Y0 : $i]: ($true)))) )),
% 1.68/1.44    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f143])).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f143,plain,(
% 1.68/1.44    ( ! [X1 : $i] : (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1) = ((^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: ($true)))) @ X1))) )),
% 1.68/1.44    inference(argument_congruence,[status(thm)],[f105])).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f105,plain,(
% 1.68/1.44    (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI = (^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: ($true)))))),
% 1.68/1.44    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f81,f88])).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f88,plain,(
% 1.68/1.44    (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI = parent_THFTYPE_IiioI)),
% 1.68/1.44    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f77])).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f77,plain,(
% 1.68/1.44    ($true != $true) | (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI = parent_THFTYPE_IiioI)),
% 1.68/1.44    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f56,f37])).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f37,plain,(
% 1.68/1.44    ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
% 1.68/1.44    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f31])).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f31,plain,(
% 1.68/1.44    ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
% 1.68/1.44    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f30])).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f30,plain,(
% 1.68/1.44    (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)),
% 1.68/1.44    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3])).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f3,axiom,(
% 1.68/1.44    (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)),
% 1.68/1.44    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RcS1H2SaOu/DTF2THF_16606.p',ax_002)).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f56,plain,(
% 1.68/1.44    ( ! [X0 : $i > $i > $o] : (($true != (X0 @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) | (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI = X0)) )),
% 1.68/1.44    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f50])).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f50,plain,(
% 1.68/1.44    ( ! [X0 : $i > $i > $o] : (($true != $true) | (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI = X0) | ($true != (X0 @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))) )),
% 1.68/1.44    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f44,f39])).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f39,plain,(
% 1.68/1.44    ((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
% 1.68/1.44    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f15])).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.68/1.44    ((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
% 1.68/1.44    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f14])).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.68/1.44    (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)),
% 1.68/1.44    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f9,axiom,(
% 1.68/1.44    (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)),
% 1.68/1.44    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RcS1H2SaOu/DTF2THF_16606.p',ax_008)).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f44,plain,(
% 1.68/1.44    ( ! [X2 : $i > $i > $o,X0 : $i,X1 : $i > $i > $o] : (((X2 @ X0 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i) != $true) | (X1 = X2) | ((X1 @ X0 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) != $true)) )),
% 1.68/1.44    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f43])).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f43,plain,(
% 1.68/1.44    ( ! [X2 : $i > $i > $o,X0 : $i,X1 : $i > $i > $o] : (((X1 @ X0 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) != $true) | ($true = (X1 = X2)) | ((X2 @ X0 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i) != $true)) )),
% 1.68/1.44    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f41])).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f41,plain,(
% 1.68/1.44    ( ! [X2 : $i > $i > $o,X0 : $i,X1 : $i > $i > $o] : (((X2 @ X0 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i) != $true) | ((X1 @ X0 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) != $true) | ((~ (X1 = X2)) != $true)) )),
% 1.68/1.44    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f36])).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f36,plain,(
% 1.68/1.44    ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i > $i > $o,X2 : $i > $i > $o] : (((X1 @ X0 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) != $true) | ((~ (X1 = X2)) != $true) | ((X2 @ X0 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i) != $true))),
% 1.68/1.44    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f29])).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f29,plain,(
% 1.68/1.44    ~? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i > $i > $o,X2 : $i > $i > $o] : (((X1 @ X0 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true) & ((~ (X1 = X2)) = $true) & ((X2 @ X0 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i) = $true))),
% 1.68/1.44    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f28])).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f28,plain,(
% 1.68/1.44    ~? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i > $i > $o,X2 : $i > $i > $o] : ((~ (X1 = X2)) & (X1 @ X0 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (X2 @ X0 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))),
% 1.68/1.44    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f12,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.68/1.44    ~? [X2 : $i,X1 : $i > $i > $o,X0 : $i > $i > $o] : ((~ (X0 = X1)) & (X1 @ X2 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (X0 @ X2 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))),
% 1.68/1.44    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f11])).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f11,conjecture,(
% 1.68/1.44    ? [X2 : $i,X1 : $i > $i > $o,X0 : $i > $i > $o] : ((~ (X0 = X1)) & (X1 @ X2 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (X0 @ X2 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))),
% 1.68/1.44    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RcS1H2SaOu/DTF2THF_16606.p',con)).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f81,plain,(
% 1.68/1.44    (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI = (^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: ($true)))))),
% 1.68/1.44    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f80])).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f80,plain,(
% 1.68/1.44    ($true != $true) | (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI = (^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: ($true)))))),
% 1.68/1.44    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f74])).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f74,plain,(
% 1.68/1.44    (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI = (^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: ($true))))) | (((^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: ($true)))) @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) != $true)),
% 1.68/1.44    inference(primitive_instantiation,[status(thm)],[f56])).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f42,plain,(
% 1.68/1.44    ((~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i)) = $true)),
% 1.68/1.44    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f25])).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f25,plain,(
% 1.68/1.44    ((~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i)) = $true)),
% 1.68/1.44    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f24])).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f24,plain,(
% 1.68/1.44    (~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i))),
% 1.68/1.44    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.68/1.44  thf(f2,axiom,(
% 1.68/1.44    (~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i))),
% 1.68/1.44    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RcS1H2SaOu/DTF2THF_16606.p',ax_001)).
% 1.68/1.44  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_16606
% 1.68/1.44  % (16708)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.44  % (16708)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.68/1.44  % (16708)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.68/1.44  
% 1.68/1.44  % (16708)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.68/1.44  % (16708)Time elapsed: 0.009 s
% 1.68/1.44  % (16708)Instructions burned: 11 (million)
% 1.68/1.44  % (16708)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.44  % (16708)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.44  % (16702)Success in time 0.023 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------