↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : CSR139^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 07:46:58 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 5.50s 1.92s
% Output   : Refutation 5.50s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (  32 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   48 (  15 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  138 (  30   ~;  12   |;   6   &;  90   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   30 (  30   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   11 (   8 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   2   ^;  13   !;   9   ?;  24   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(num_type,type,
    num: $tType ).

thf(lAnna_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    lAnna_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lBen_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    lBen_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lBill_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lBob_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    lBob_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lMary_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lSue_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI_decl,type,
    likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(parent_THFTYPE_IiioI_decl,type,
    parent_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(6,axiom,
    parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBen_THFTYPE_i,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_003) ).

thf(20,plain,
    parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBen_THFTYPE_i,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ? [A: $i > $i > $o,B: $i > $i > $o,C: $i] :
      ( ( B @ C @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
      & ( A @ C @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
      & ( B != A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [A: $i > $i > $o,B: $i > $i > $o,C: $i] :
        ( ( B @ C @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
        & ( A @ C @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
        & ( B != A ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ~ ? [A: $i > $i > $o,B: $i > $i > $o,C: $i] :
        ( ( B @ C @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
        & ( A @ C @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
        & ( B != A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_001) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i ),
    inference(polarity_switch,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax) ).

thf(16,plain,
    likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_002) ).

thf(19,plain,
    likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i > $i > $o,A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ( B @ C @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
      | ~ ( A @ C @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
      | ( B = A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[13]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i > $i > $o,A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( B = A )
      | ~ ( B @ C @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
      | ~ ( A @ C @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(45,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i > $i > $o,A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( B = A )
      | ~ $true
      | ~ ( A @ C @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
      | ( ( parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBen_THFTYPE_i )
       != ( B @ C @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[20,15]) ).

thf(46,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i > $i > $o,A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( B = A )
      | ~ ( A @ C @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
      | ( ( parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBen_THFTYPE_i )
       != ( B @ C @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[45]) ).

thf(83,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( ^ [B: $i,C: $i] : ( parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ B @ lBen_THFTYPE_i ) )
        = A )
      | ~ ( A @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(pre_uni,[status(thm)],[46:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( ^ [D: $i] : ^ [E: $i] : ( parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ D @ lBen_THFTYPE_i ) )),bind(C,$thf( lMary_THFTYPE_i ))]]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_006) ).

thf(24,plain,
    likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_007) ).

thf(25,plain,
    parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    ~ ( parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_009) ).

thf(27,plain,
    ~ ( parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(28,plain,
    ~ ( parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i ),
    inference(polarity_switch,[status(thm)],[27]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBen_THFTYPE_i,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_004) ).

thf(21,plain,
    parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBen_THFTYPE_i,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(29,plain,
    ( ~ $true
    | ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i )
     != ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[16,18]) ).

thf(30,plain,
    ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i )
   != ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[29]) ).

thf(31,plain,
    ( ( lSue_THFTYPE_i != lSue_THFTYPE_i )
    | ( lMary_THFTYPE_i != lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[30]) ).

thf(32,plain,
    lMary_THFTYPE_i != lBill_THFTYPE_i,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[31]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ~ ( parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBen_THFTYPE_i ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_005) ).

thf(22,plain,
    ~ ( parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBen_THFTYPE_i ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_008) ).

thf(26,plain,
    parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ~ ( parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBen_THFTYPE_i ),
    inference(polarity_switch,[status(thm)],[22]) ).

thf(221,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[20,13,18,16,19,15,83,24,25,28,21,32,17,22,27,26,23]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : CSR139^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.10/0.20  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.20  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.20  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.20  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.20  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.20  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.20  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.20  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 17:55:59 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.20  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.20  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.72/0.52  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 0.97/0.63  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (104ms). 
% 0.97/0.64  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.42/0.83  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.42/0.83  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.42/0.88  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 10 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.69/0.90  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 10 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.69/0.91  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 1.69/0.91  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.69/0.91  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 5.50/1.91  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 5.50/1.92  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 5.50/1.92  % Time passed: 1622ms (effective reasoning time: 1276ms)
% 5.50/1.92  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 5.50/1.92  % Axioms used in derivation (10): ax_007, ax_003, ax_009, ax_002, ax_005, ax, ax_008, ax_004, ax_006, ax_001
% 5.50/1.92  % No. of inferences in proof: 36
% 5.50/1.92  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1622 ms resp. 1276 ms w/o parsing
% 5.50/1.96  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.50/1.96  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------