%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR140^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 07:46:38 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 0.28s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 8 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 8 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 0 avg)
% Number of connectives : 43 ( 9 ~; 2 |; 2 &; 30 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 5 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 8 ( 8 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 5 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 0 ^; 7 !; 6 ?; 13 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_31,type,
lAnna_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(decl_36,type,
lBob_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(decl_39,type,
lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(decl_43,type,
parent_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(con,conjecture,
? [X24: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( X24 @ X1 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
& ~ ( X24 @ X2 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.i2uY0MNJdn/E---3.1_1634611.p',con) ).
thf(ax_025,axiom,
~ ( parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.i2uY0MNJdn/E---3.1_1634611.p',ax_025) ).
thf(ax_012,axiom,
parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.i2uY0MNJdn/E---3.1_1634611.p',ax_012) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X24: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( X24 @ X1 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
& ~ ( X24 @ X2 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).
thf(c_0_4,plain,
~ ( parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax_025]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X28: $i > $i > $o,X29: $i,X30: $i] :
( ~ ( X28 @ X29 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
| ( X28 @ X30 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
thf(c_0_6,plain,
~ ( parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
! [X24: $i > $i > $o,X2: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( X24 @ X2 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( X24 @ X1 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
thf(c_0_8,plain,
parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax_012]) ).
thf(c_0_9,plain,
~ ( parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i] : ( parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
thf(c_0_11,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR140^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.19 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.19 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.19 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.19 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.19 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.19 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.19 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.19 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 17:56:22 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.20 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.20 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.24 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.26 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.i2uY0MNJdn/E---3.1_1634611.p
% 0.23/0.28 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.23/0.28 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSMSSSNSSA.
% 0.23/0.28 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.28 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.28 % Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.28 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.28 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.28 % new_bool_3 with pid 1634627 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.28 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.23/0.28 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSMSSSNSSA.
% 0.23/0.28 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.28 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.28 % Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.28 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.28 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.28 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.23/0.28 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.28 % Search class: HHUNF-FFSM00-SSSFFFBN
% 0.23/0.28 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.28 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.28 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1634628 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.28 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.23/0.28 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSMSSSNSSA.
% 0.23/0.28 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.28 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.28 % Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.28 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.28 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.28 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.23/0.28 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.28 % Search class: HHUNF-FFSM00-SSSFFFBN
% 0.23/0.28 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.28 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.28 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.23/0.28
% 0.23/0.28 % Proof found!
% 0.23/0.28 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/0.28 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.28 % Parsed axioms : 71
% 0.23/0.28 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 50
% 0.23/0.28 % Initial clauses : 21
% 0.23/0.28 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/0.28 % Initial clauses in saturation : 21
% 0.23/0.28 % Processed clauses : 22
% 0.23/0.28 % ...of these trivial : 7
% 0.23/0.28 % ...subsumed : 3
% 0.23/0.28 % ...remaining for further processing : 12
% 0.23/0.28 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/0.28 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/0.28 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.28 % Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.23/0.28 % Generated clauses : 3
% 0.23/0.28 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.23/0.28 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.28 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/0.28 % Paramodulations : 3
% 0.23/0.28 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/0.28 % NegExts : 0
% 0.23/0.28 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/0.28 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.23/0.28 % Total rewrite steps : 8
% 0.23/0.28 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.23/0.28 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.23/0.28 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.23/0.28 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.28 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.28 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.28 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.23/0.28 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.28 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.28 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.28 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.28 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.28 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.28 % Current number of processed clauses : 9
% 0.23/0.28 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.23/0.28 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.28 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.23/0.28 % Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.23/0.28 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.23/0.28 % ...number of literals in the above : 1
% 0.23/0.28 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/0.28 % Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.23/0.28 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.23/0.28 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/0.28 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.23/0.28 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.23/0.28 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/0.28 % BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.23/0.28 % BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.23/0.28 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.28 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/0.28 % Termbank termtop insertions : 959
% 0.23/0.28 % Search garbage collected termcells : 201
% 0.23/0.28
% 0.23/0.28 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.28 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.23/0.28 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.23/0.28 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.23/0.28 % Maximum resident set size: 3692 pages
% 0.23/0.28
% 0.23/0.28 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.28 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.23/0.28 % System time : 0.008 s
% 0.23/0.28 % Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.23/0.28 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.23/0.28 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------