↑ Up

E---3.5.1.CSA-Sat.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : CSR141_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:17:36 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 0.15s 0.61s
% Output   : Saturation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_8ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_11ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lWhenFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(lCADE_BM_THFTYPE_i),$true),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax_003]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lWhenFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(lCADE_BM_THFTYPE_i),$false),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    connected_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMariaPaola_THFTYPE_i,lReiner_THFTYPE_i),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_9])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    instance_THFTYPE_IiioI(lCADE_BM_THFTYPE_i,lMeeting_THFTYPE_i),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax_002]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    agent_THFTYPE_IiioI(lCADE_BM_THFTYPE_i,lReiner_THFTYPE_i),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    agent_THFTYPE_IiioI(lCADE_BM_THFTYPE_i,lMariaPaola_THFTYPE_i),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax_001]),
    [final] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : CSR141_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.55  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.55  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.55  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.55  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.55  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.55  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.55  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.55  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:12:20 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.55  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.55  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.59  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.59  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.61  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.61  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.61  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.61  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.61  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.61  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.61  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.61  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 173573 completed with status 1
% 0.15/0.61  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.15/0.61  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.61  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.61  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.61  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.61  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.61  % Search class: FHHNF-FFSS11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.61  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.61  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.61  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.61  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 169s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.61  % Starting new_bool_3 with 169s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.61  % Starting new_bool_1 with 169s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.61  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 173580 completed with status 1
% 0.15/0.61  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.15/0.61  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.61  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.61  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.61  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.61  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.61  % Search class: FHHNF-FFSS11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.61  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.61  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.61  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.61  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 169s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.61  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.61  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.61  
% 0.15/0.61  % No proof found!
% 0.15/0.61  % SZS status CounterSatisfiable
% 0.15/0.61  % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.61  % Parsed axioms                        : 15
% 0.15/0.61  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.15/0.61  % Initial clauses                      : 18
% 0.15/0.61  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 11
% 0.15/0.61  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 7
% 0.15/0.61  % Processed clauses                    : 13
% 0.15/0.61  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.15/0.61  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.15/0.61  % ...remaining for further processing  : 13
% 0.15/0.61  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.15/0.61  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.15/0.61  % Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.15/0.61  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.15/0.61  % Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.15/0.61  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.15/0.61  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.15/0.61  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.15/0.61  % Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.15/0.61  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.15/0.61  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.15/0.61  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.15/0.61  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.15/0.61  % Total rewrite steps                  : 2
% 0.15/0.61  % ...of those cached                   : 1
% 0.15/0.61  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.15/0.61  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.15/0.61  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.61  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.15/0.61  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.61  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.15/0.61  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.15/0.61  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.15/0.61  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.15/0.61  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.15/0.61  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.15/0.61  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.15/0.61  % Current number of processed clauses  : 6
% 0.15/0.61  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
% 0.15/0.61  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.61  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.15/0.61  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.15/0.61  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.61  % ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.15/0.61  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.15/0.61  % Current number of archived clauses   : 7
% 0.15/0.61  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.15/0.61  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.61  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.15/0.61  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.15/0.61  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.15/0.61  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.15/0.61  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.15/0.61  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.15/0.61  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.15/0.61  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 343
% 0.15/0.61  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 22
% 0.15/0.61  
% 0.15/0.61  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.61  % User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.61  % System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.61  % Total time               : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.61  % Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
% 0.15/0.61  
% 0.15/0.61  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.61  % User time                : 0.009 s
% 0.15/0.61  % System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.15/0.61  % Total time               : 0.018 s
% 0.15/0.61  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.15/0.61  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------