↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : CSR142^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 07:46:53 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.83s 4.00s
% Output   : Proof 3.83s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.15  % Problem    : CSR142^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.04/0.16  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.16/0.38  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.38  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.38  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.38  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.38  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.38  % DateTime   : Thu Oct  2 20:27:08 EDT 2025
% 0.16/0.39  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.83/4.00  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.83/4.00  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.83/4.00  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI husband_THFTYPE_IiioI wife_THFTYPE_IiioI) True
% 3.83/4.00  Clause #1 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 3.83/4.00    (∀ (REL2 REL1 : Iota → Iota → Prop),
% 3.83/4.00      inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI REL1 REL2 → ∀ (INST1 INST2 : Iota), Iff (REL1 INST1 INST2) (REL2 INST2 INST1))
% 3.83/4.00    True
% 3.83/4.00  Clause #2 (by assumption #[]): Eq (wife_THFTYPE_IiioI lCorina_THFTYPE_i lChris_THFTYPE_i) True
% 3.83/4.00  Clause #3 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (Exists fun X => husband_THFTYPE_IiioI X lCorina_THFTYPE_i)) True
% 3.83/4.00  Clause #4 (by clausification #[3]): Eq (Exists fun X => husband_THFTYPE_IiioI X lCorina_THFTYPE_i) False
% 3.83/4.00  Clause #5 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI a lCorina_THFTYPE_i) False
% 3.83/4.00  Clause #6 (by clausification #[1]): ∀ (a : Iota → Iota → Prop),
% 3.83/4.00    Eq
% 3.83/4.00      (∀ (REL1 : Iota → Iota → Prop),
% 3.83/4.00        inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI REL1 a → ∀ (INST1 INST2 : Iota), Iff (REL1 INST1 INST2) (a INST2 INST1))
% 3.83/4.00      True
% 3.83/4.00  Clause #7 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota → Iota → Prop),
% 3.83/4.00    Eq (inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI a a_1 → ∀ (INST1 INST2 : Iota), Iff (a INST1 INST2) (a_1 INST2 INST1)) True
% 3.83/4.00  Clause #8 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota → Iota → Prop),
% 3.83/4.00    Or (Eq (inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI a a_1) False)
% 3.83/4.00      (Eq (∀ (INST1 INST2 : Iota), Iff (a INST1 INST2) (a_1 INST2 INST1)) True)
% 3.83/4.00  Clause #9 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota → Iota → Prop) (a_2 : Iota),
% 3.83/4.00    Or (Eq (inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI a a_1) False) (Eq (∀ (INST2 : Iota), Iff (a a_2 INST2) (a_1 INST2 a_2)) True)
% 3.83/4.00  Clause #10 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota → Iota → Prop) (a_2 a_3 : Iota),
% 3.83/4.00    Or (Eq (inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI a a_1) False) (Eq (Iff (a a_2 a_3) (a_1 a_3 a_2)) True)
% 3.83/4.00  Clause #11 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota → Iota → Prop) (a_2 a_3 : Iota),
% 3.83/4.00    Or (Eq (inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI a a_1) False) (Or (Eq (a a_2 a_3) True) (Eq (a_1 a_3 a_2) False))
% 3.83/4.00  Clause #13 (by superposition #[11, 0]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.83/4.00    Or (Eq ((fun x x_1 => husband_THFTYPE_IiioI x x_1) a a_1) True)
% 3.83/4.00      (Or (Eq ((fun x x_1 => wife_THFTYPE_IiioI x x_1) a_1 a) False) (Eq False True))
% 3.83/4.00  Clause #15 (by betaEtaReduce #[13]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI a a_1) True) (Or (Eq (wife_THFTYPE_IiioI a_1 a) False) (Eq False True))
% 3.83/4.00  Clause #16 (by clausification #[15]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI a a_1) True) (Eq (wife_THFTYPE_IiioI a_1 a) False)
% 3.83/4.00  Clause #17 (by superposition #[16, 2]): Or (Eq (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI lChris_THFTYPE_i lCorina_THFTYPE_i) True) (Eq False True)
% 3.83/4.00  Clause #18 (by clausification #[17]): Eq (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI lChris_THFTYPE_i lCorina_THFTYPE_i) True
% 3.83/4.00  Clause #19 (by superposition #[18, 5]): Eq True False
% 3.83/4.00  Clause #20 (by clausification #[19]): False
% 3.83/4.00  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------