↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : CSR142^2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 07:46:53 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 49.33s 49.56s
% Output   : Proof 49.33s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : CSR142^2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Thu Oct  2 20:24:23 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 49.33/49.56  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 49.33/49.56  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 49.33/49.56  Clause #6 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 49.33/49.56    (∀ (REL2 REL1 : Iota → Iota → Prop),
% 49.33/49.56      inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI REL1 REL2 → ∀ (INST1 INST2 : Iota), Iff (REL1 INST1 INST2) (REL2 INST2 INST1))
% 49.33/49.56    True
% 49.33/49.56  Clause #42 (by assumption #[]): Eq (inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI husband_THFTYPE_IiioI wife_THFTYPE_IiioI) True
% 49.33/49.56  Clause #51 (by assumption #[]): Eq (wife_THFTYPE_IiioI lCorina_THFTYPE_i lChris_THFTYPE_i) True
% 49.33/49.56  Clause #228 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (Exists fun X => husband_THFTYPE_IiioI X lCorina_THFTYPE_i)) True
% 49.33/49.56  Clause #253 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a : Iota → Iota → Prop),
% 49.33/49.56    Eq
% 49.33/49.56      (∀ (REL1 : Iota → Iota → Prop),
% 49.33/49.56        inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI REL1 a → ∀ (INST1 INST2 : Iota), Iff (REL1 INST1 INST2) (a INST2 INST1))
% 49.33/49.56      True
% 49.33/49.56  Clause #254 (by clausification #[253]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota → Iota → Prop),
% 49.33/49.56    Eq (inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI a a_1 → ∀ (INST1 INST2 : Iota), Iff (a INST1 INST2) (a_1 INST2 INST1)) True
% 49.33/49.56  Clause #255 (by clausification #[254]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota → Iota → Prop),
% 49.33/49.56    Or (Eq (inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI a a_1) False)
% 49.33/49.56      (Eq (∀ (INST1 INST2 : Iota), Iff (a INST1 INST2) (a_1 INST2 INST1)) True)
% 49.33/49.56  Clause #256 (by clausification #[255]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota → Iota → Prop) (a_2 : Iota),
% 49.33/49.56    Or (Eq (inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI a a_1) False) (Eq (∀ (INST2 : Iota), Iff (a a_2 INST2) (a_1 INST2 a_2)) True)
% 49.33/49.56  Clause #257 (by clausification #[256]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota → Iota → Prop) (a_2 a_3 : Iota),
% 49.33/49.56    Or (Eq (inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI a a_1) False) (Eq (Iff (a a_2 a_3) (a_1 a_3 a_2)) True)
% 49.33/49.56  Clause #258 (by clausification #[257]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota → Iota → Prop) (a_2 a_3 : Iota),
% 49.33/49.56    Or (Eq (inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI a a_1) False) (Or (Eq (a a_2 a_3) True) (Eq (a_1 a_3 a_2) False))
% 49.33/49.56  Clause #294 (by superposition #[42, 258]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 49.33/49.56    Or (Eq ((fun x x_1 => husband_THFTYPE_IiioI x x_1) a a_1) True)
% 49.33/49.56      (Or (Eq ((fun x x_1 => wife_THFTYPE_IiioI x x_1) a_1 a) False) (Eq False True))
% 49.33/49.56  Clause #2850 (by clausification #[228]): Eq (Exists fun X => husband_THFTYPE_IiioI X lCorina_THFTYPE_i) False
% 49.33/49.56  Clause #2851 (by clausification #[2850]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI a lCorina_THFTYPE_i) False
% 49.33/49.56  Clause #5301 (by betaEtaReduce #[294]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI a a_1) True) (Or (Eq (wife_THFTYPE_IiioI a_1 a) False) (Eq False True))
% 49.33/49.56  Clause #5302 (by clausification #[5301]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI a a_1) True) (Eq (wife_THFTYPE_IiioI a_1 a) False)
% 49.33/49.56  Clause #5303 (by superposition #[5302, 51]): Or (Eq (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI lChris_THFTYPE_i lCorina_THFTYPE_i) True) (Eq False True)
% 49.33/49.56  Clause #5312 (by clausification #[5303]): Eq (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI lChris_THFTYPE_i lCorina_THFTYPE_i) True
% 49.33/49.56  Clause #5313 (by superposition #[5312, 2851]): Eq True False
% 49.33/49.56  Clause #5335 (by clausification #[5313]): False
% 49.33/49.56  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------