%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR143^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 07:46:39 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.10s 0.24s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.10s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 5 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 68 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 12 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 180 ( 26 ~; 20 |; 7 &; 125 @)
% ( 1 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 12 ( 12 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 10 ( 8 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 0 ^; 21 !; 3 ?; 24 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_23,type,
holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o ).
thf(decl_24,type,
husband_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_25,type,
lChris_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(decl_26,type,
lCorina_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(decl_27,type,
lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i ).
thf(decl_28,type,
n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(decl_29,type,
wife_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_30,type,
inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(con,conjecture,
? [X6: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X6 @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8ookMTvTAW/E---3.1_1150296.p',con) ).
thf(ax_002,axiom,
! [X5: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X5 @ $true ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8ookMTvTAW/E---3.1_1150296.p',ax_002) ).
thf(ax_003,axiom,
holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8ookMTvTAW/E---3.1_1150296.p',ax_003) ).
thf(ax_001,axiom,
! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X2: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X2 @ X1 )
=> ! [X3: $i,X4: $i] :
( ( X2 @ X3 @ X4 )
<=> ( X1 @ X4 @ X3 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8ookMTvTAW/E---3.1_1150296.p',ax_001) ).
thf(ax,axiom,
inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ wife_THFTYPE_IiioI,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8ookMTvTAW/E---3.1_1150296.p',ax) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X6: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X6 @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).
thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X6: $i] :
( ( ~ ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X6 @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) )
& ( ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X6 @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ) ) ),
inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
! [X18: $i] :
( ( ~ ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X18 @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i )
| ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X18 @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i ) )
& ( ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false )
| ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X18 @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i ) )
& ( ~ ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X18 @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) )
& ( ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_8,plain,
! [X17: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X17 @ $true ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax_002]) ).
thf(c_0_9,axiom,
( ( ~ ( wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) )
& ( ( wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ) ) ),
inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_003]) ).
thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i] :
( ~ ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X3 @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
thf(c_0_11,plain,
! [X3: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X3 @ $true ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
thf(c_0_12,plain,
! [X13: $i > $i > $o,X14: $i > $i > $o,X15: $i,X16: $i] :
( ( ~ ( X14 @ X15 @ X16 )
| ( X13 @ X16 @ X15 )
| ~ ( inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X14 @ X13 ) )
& ( ~ ( X13 @ X16 @ X15 )
| ( X14 @ X15 @ X16 )
| ~ ( inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X14 @ X13 ) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax_001])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_13,plain,
( ( ~ ( wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) )
& ( ( wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i] :
~ ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X3 @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11])]) ).
thf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i] :
( ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X3 @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ~ $true ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
thf(c_0_16,plain,
! [X4: $i,X3: $i,X2: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( X2 @ X4 @ X3 )
| ~ ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 )
| ~ ( inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X2 @ X1 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
thf(c_0_17,plain,
inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ wife_THFTYPE_IiioI,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax]) ).
thf(c_0_18,plain,
( ( wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ~ $true ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
thf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ~ $true ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
thf(c_0_20,plain,
! [X4: $i,X3: $i] :
( ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X3 @ X4 )
| ~ ( wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X4 @ X3 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
thf(c_0_21,plain,
wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
thf(c_0_22,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_14]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : CSR143^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.16 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.16 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.16 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.16 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.16 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.16 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.16 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.16 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 17:56:47 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.17 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.17 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.21 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.22 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8ookMTvTAW/E---3.1_1150296.p
% 0.10/0.24 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.10/0.24 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSFA.
% 0.10/0.24 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.24 % Starting new_ho_14 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.24 % Starting full_lambda_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.24 % Starting new_ho_13 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.24 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.24 % new_ho_13 with pid 1150311 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.24 % Result found by new_ho_13
% 0.10/0.24 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSFA.
% 0.10/0.24 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.24 % Starting new_ho_14 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.24 % Starting full_lambda_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.24 % Starting new_ho_13 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.24 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.10/0.24 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.10/0.24 % Search class: HGHNF-FFSF11-SSFFFSBN
% 0.10/0.24 % partial match(1): HGHNF-FFSF11-SSSFFSBN
% 0.10/0.24 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.10/0.24 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.24 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1150313 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.24 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.10/0.24 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSFA.
% 0.10/0.24 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.24 % Starting new_ho_14 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.24 % Starting full_lambda_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.24 % Starting new_ho_13 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.24 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.10/0.24 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.10/0.24 % Search class: HGHNF-FFSF11-SSFFFSBN
% 0.10/0.24 % partial match(1): HGHNF-FFSF11-SSSFFSBN
% 0.10/0.24 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.10/0.24 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.24 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.10/0.24
% 0.10/0.24 % Proof found!
% 0.10/0.24 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.10/0.24 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.10/0.24 % Parsed axioms : 14
% 0.10/0.24 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.10/0.24 % Initial clauses : 19
% 0.10/0.24 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 10
% 0.10/0.24 % Initial clauses in saturation : 9
% 0.10/0.24 % Processed clauses : 12
% 0.10/0.24 % ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.10/0.24 % ...subsumed : 1
% 0.10/0.24 % ...remaining for further processing : 10
% 0.10/0.24 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.10/0.24 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.10/0.24 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.10/0.24 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.10/0.24 % Generated clauses : 5
% 0.10/0.24 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 0.10/0.24 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.10/0.24 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.10/0.24 % Paramodulations : 4
% 0.10/0.24 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.10/0.24 % NegExts : 0
% 0.10/0.24 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.10/0.24 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.10/0.24 % Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.10/0.24 % ...of those cached : 2
% 0.10/0.24 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.10/0.24 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.10/0.24 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.10/0.24 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.10/0.24 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.10/0.24 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.10/0.24 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.24 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.24 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.24 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.24 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.24 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.24 % Current number of processed clauses : 8
% 0.10/0.24 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.10/0.24 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.10/0.24 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.10/0.24 % Non-unit-clauses : 3
% 0.10/0.24 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.10/0.24 % ...number of literals in the above : 2
% 0.10/0.24 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.10/0.24 % Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.10/0.24 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.10/0.24 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.10/0.24 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.10/0.24 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.10/0.24 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.10/0.24 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.10/0.24 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.10/0.24 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.10/0.24 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.10/0.24 % Termbank termtop insertions : 793
% 0.10/0.24 % Search garbage collected termcells : 105
% 0.10/0.24
% 0.10/0.24 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.24 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.10/0.24 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.10/0.24 % Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.10/0.24 % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.10/0.24
% 0.10/0.24 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.24 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.10/0.24 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.10/0.24 % Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.10/0.24 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.10/0.24 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------