%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR144_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:17:37 PM UTC 2026
% Result : CounterSatisfiable 0.09s 0.43s
% Output : Saturation 0.09s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_4ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_9ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ husband_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMax_THFTYPE_i,X1)
| believes_THFTYPE_IiooI(lMax_THFTYPE_i,$true) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( believes_THFTYPE_IiooI(lMax_THFTYPE_i,$false)
| husband_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMax_THFTYPE_i,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( believes_THFTYPE_IiooI(lMax_THFTYPE_i,$true)
| believes_THFTYPE_IiooI(lMax_THFTYPE_i,$false) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(X2,$true)
| ~ considers_THFTYPE_IiooI(lMax_THFTYPE_i,$false)
| wife_THFTYPE_IiioI(X1,lMax_THFTYPE_i) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ wife_THFTYPE_IiioI(X2,lMax_THFTYPE_i)
| ~ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(X1,$false)
| considers_THFTYPE_IiooI(lMax_THFTYPE_i,$true) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(X2,$true)
| ~ considers_THFTYPE_IiooI(lMax_THFTYPE_i,$true)
| ~ wife_THFTYPE_IiioI(X1,lMax_THFTYPE_i) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(X1,$true)
| ~ considers_THFTYPE_IiooI(lMax_THFTYPE_i,$true)
| ~ considers_THFTYPE_IiooI(lMax_THFTYPE_i,$false) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(X1,$false)
| wife_THFTYPE_IiioI(X2,lMax_THFTYPE_i)
| considers_THFTYPE_IiooI(lMax_THFTYPE_i,$false) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(X1,$true)
| ~ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(X1,$false) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(X1,$false)
| considers_THFTYPE_IiooI(lMax_THFTYPE_i,$true)
| considers_THFTYPE_IiooI(lMax_THFTYPE_i,$false) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : CSR144_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.36 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:14:44 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.43 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.09/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.43 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.43 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.43 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 2190123 completed with status 1
% 0.09/0.43 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.09/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.43 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.09/0.43 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.09/0.43 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.09/0.43 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.09/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.43 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.43 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 2190130 completed with status 1
% 0.09/0.43 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.09/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.43 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.09/0.43 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.09/0.43 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.09/0.43 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.09/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.43 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.43 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.09/0.43
% 0.09/0.43 % No proof found!
% 0.09/0.43 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable
% 0.09/0.43 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.09/0.43 % Parsed axioms : 9
% 0.09/0.43 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % Initial clauses : 34
% 0.09/0.43 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 25
% 0.09/0.43 % Initial clauses in saturation : 9
% 0.09/0.43 % Processed clauses : 10
% 0.09/0.43 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % ...remaining for further processing : 10
% 0.09/0.43 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % Generated clauses : 1
% 0.09/0.43 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.09/0.43 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % Paramodulations : 1
% 0.09/0.43 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % NegExts : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.09/0.43 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.43 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.43 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.43 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.43 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.43 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.43 % Current number of processed clauses : 10
% 0.09/0.43 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.09/0.43 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % Non-unit-clauses : 10
% 0.09/0.43 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.09/0.43 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.09/0.43 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1013
% 0.09/0.43 % Search garbage collected termcells : 128
% 0.09/0.43
% 0.09/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/0.43 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.09/0.43 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.09/0.43 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.09/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 3580 pages
% 0.09/0.43
% 0.09/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/0.43 % User time : 0.012 s
% 0.09/0.43 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.09/0.43 % Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.09/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.09/0.43 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------