↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : CSR145^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 08:43:11 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.69s 1.48s
% Output   : Refutation 1.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   46 (  15 unt;   0 typ;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  205 (  54 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  170 (  35   ~;  20   |;   4   &; 104   @)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   40 (  40   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   12 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   74 (  28   ^;  38   !;   8   ?;  74   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_0,type,
    num: $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    husband_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    wife_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    vEPSILON: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_15,type,
    ph2: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(f230,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f187,f229]) ).

thf(f229,plain,
    ~ spl1_3,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f228]) ).

thf(f228,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl1_3 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f209]) ).

thf(f209,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl1_3 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f29,f202]) ).

thf(f202,plain,
    ( ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( $true
        = ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X2 ) )
    | ~ spl1_3 ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f201]) ).

thf(f201,plain,
    ( ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X2 )
        = ( ^ [Y0: $i] : $true
          @ X2 ) )
    | ~ spl1_3 ),
    inference(argument_congruence,[status(thm)],[f194]) ).

thf(f194,plain,
    ( ! [X1: $i] :
        ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] : $true )
        = ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 ) )
    | ~ spl1_3 ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f193]) ).

thf(f193,plain,
    ( ! [X1: $i] :
        ( ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] : $true
          @ X1 )
        = ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 ) )
    | ~ spl1_3 ),
    inference(argument_congruence,[status(thm)],[f67]) ).

thf(f67,plain,
    ( ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] : $true ) )
    | ~ spl1_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f65]) ).

thf(f65,definition,
    ( spl1_3
  <=> ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] : $true ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ( ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ sK0 )
    = $false ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f22]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( ~ ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f21]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( ~ ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f9,f20]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i] :
        ( ( ~ ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ X0 ) )
        = $true )
   => ( $true
      = ( ~ ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ sK0 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ? [X0: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ X0 ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ? [X0: $i] :
      ~ ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ X0 ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3]) ).

thf(f3,axiom,
    ? [X4: $i] :
      ~ ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ X4 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hNY4QMFKCz/DTF2THF_19076.p',ax_002) ).

thf(f187,plain,
    spl1_3,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f42,f65]) ).

thf(f42,plain,
    ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] : $true ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f41]) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ( ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] : $true ) )
    | ( $true != $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f28,f39]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f37]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i ) )
    | ( $true = $false ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f23,f33]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ X1 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f32]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ X1 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true )
      | ( $true != $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f30,f25]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ( ( inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ wife_THFTYPE_IiioI )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ( inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ wife_THFTYPE_IiioI )
    = $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ wife_THFTYPE_IiioI,
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ wife_THFTYPE_IiioI,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hNY4QMFKCz/DTF2THF_19076.p',ax) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X0: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X1 @ X0 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( X0 @ X3 @ X2 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( X1 @ X2 @ X3 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f26]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X0: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( X1 @ X2 @ X3 )
        = ( X0 @ X3 @ X2 ) )
      | ( ( inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X1 @ X0 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f18]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ! [X0: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X1 @ X0 )
       != $true )
      | ! [X2: $i,X3: $i] :
          ( ( X1 @ X2 @ X3 )
          = ( X0 @ X3 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ! [X0: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true )
     => ! [X2: $i,X3: $i] :
          ( ( X1 @ X2 @ X3 )
          = ( X0 @ X3 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ! [X0: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X1 @ X0 )
     => ! [X2: $i,X3: $i] :
          ( ( X1 @ X2 @ X3 )
        <=> ( X0 @ X3 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X1 @ X0 )
     => ! [X2: $i,X3: $i] :
          ( ( X1 @ X2 @ X3 )
        <=> ( X0 @ X3 @ X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hNY4QMFKCz/DTF2THF_19076.p',ax_001) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( ( wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f17]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( ( wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i )
    = $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i,
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,axiom,
    wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hNY4QMFKCz/DTF2THF_19076.p',ax_003) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ! [X0: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( X0 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i ) )
      | ( ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] : $true )
        = X0 ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f27]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ! [X0: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( X0 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] : $true )
          = X0 ) ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f24]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ! [X0: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( X0 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i ) )
      | ( $true
       != ( ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] : $true )
         != X0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f19]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ! [X0: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] : $true )
         != X0 ) )
      | ( $true
       != ( X0 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ~ ? [X0: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( X0 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i ) )
        & ( $true
          = ( ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] : $true )
           != X0 ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ~ ? [X0: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ( X0 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i )
        & ( ( ^ [X1: $i,X2: $i] : $true )
         != X0 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X5: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ( X5 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i )
        & ( ( ^ [X4: $i,X6: $i] : $true )
         != X5 ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,conjecture,
    ? [X5: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( X5 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i )
      & ( ( ^ [X4: $i,X6: $i] : $true )
       != X5 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hNY4QMFKCz/DTF2THF_19076.p',con) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : CSR145^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.16/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 05:51:55 EST 2026
% 0.16/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.27/0.49  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.27/0.49  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.27/0.49  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.49  % File     : CSR145^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.27/0.49  % Domain   : Commonsense Reasoning
% 0.27/0.49  % Problem  : What is the relation between Chris and Corina?
% 0.27/0.49  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.27/0.49  % English  : Corina is the wife of Chris. There is some person Chris is not 
% 0.27/0.49  %            husband of. What is the relationship between Chris and Corina?
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  % Refs     : [Ben10] Benzmueller (2010), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.27/0.49  % Source   : [Ben10]
% 0.27/0.49  % Names    : ex_4.tq_SUMO_handselected [Ben10]
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.27/0.49  % Rating   : 0.11 v9.1.0, 0.12 v9.0.0, 0.10 v8.2.0, 0.23 v8.1.0, 0.09 v7.5.0, 0.00 v7.4.0, 0.11 v7.2.0, 0.00 v7.1.0, 0.25 v7.0.0, 0.14 v6.4.0, 0.17 v6.3.0, 0.20 v6.2.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.57 v6.0.0, 0.14 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.4.0, 0.20 v5.1.0, 0.40 v5.0.0, 0.20 v4.1.0
% 0.27/0.49  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   2 unt;   6 typ;   0 def)
% 0.27/0.49  %            Number of atoms       :   10 (   1 equ;   2 cnn)
% 0.27/0.49  %            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
% 0.27/0.49  %            Number of connectives :   21 (   2   ~;   0   |;   1   &;  16   @)
% 0.27/0.49  %                                         (   1 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.27/0.49  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
% 0.27/0.49  %            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr)
% 0.27/0.49  %            Number of type conns  :   16 (  16   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.27/0.49  %            Number of symbols     :    8 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.27/0.49  %            Number of variables   :    8 (   2   ^;   4   !;   2   ?;   8   :)
% 0.27/0.49  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  % Comments : This is a simple test problem for reasoning in/about SUMO.
% 0.27/0.49  %            Initally the problem has been hand generated in KIF syntax in
% 0.27/0.49  %            SigmaKEE and then automatically translated by Benzmueller's
% 0.27/0.49  %            KIF2TH0 translator into THF syntax.
% 0.27/0.49  %          : The translation has been applied in three modes: handselected,
% 0.27/0.49  %            SInE, and local. The local mode only translates the local
% 0.27/0.49  %            assumptions and the query. The SInE mode additionally translates
% 0.27/0.49  %            the SInE extract of the loaded knowledge base (usually SUMO). The
% 0.27/0.49  %            handselected mode contains a hand-selected relevant axioms.
% 0.27/0.49  %          : The examples are selected to illustrate the benefits of
% 0.27/0.49  %            higher-order reasoning in ontology reasoning.
% 0.27/0.49  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.49  %----The extracted signature
% 0.27/0.49  thf(numbers,type,
% 0.27/0.49      num: $tType ).
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  thf(husband_THFTYPE_IiioI,type,
% 0.27/0.49      husband_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  thf(lChris_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 0.27/0.49      lChris_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  thf(lCorina_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 0.27/0.49      lCorina_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  thf(wife_THFTYPE_IiioI,type,
% 0.27/0.49      wife_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  %----The handselected axioms from the knowledge base
% 0.27/0.49  thf(inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI,type,
% 0.27/0.49      inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  thf(ax,axiom,
% 0.27/0.49      inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ wife_THFTYPE_IiioI ).
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  thf(ax_001,axiom,
% 0.27/0.49      ! [REL2: $i > $i > $o,REL1: $i > $i > $o] :
% 0.27/0.49        ( ( inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ REL1 @ REL2 )
% 0.27/0.49       => ! [INST1: $i,INST2: $i] :
% 0.27/0.49            ( ( REL1 @ INST1 @ INST2 )
% 0.27/0.49          <=> ( REL2 @ INST2 @ INST1 ) ) ) ).
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  %----The translated axioms
% 0.27/0.49  thf(ax_002,axiom,
% 0.27/0.49      ? [X: $i] : ( (~) @ ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ X ) ) ).
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  thf(ax_003,axiom,
% 0.27/0.49      wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i ).
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  %----The translated conjectures
% 0.27/0.49  thf(con,conjecture,
% 0.27/0.49      ? [R: $i > $i > $o] :
% 0.27/0.49        ( ( R @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i )
% 0.27/0.49        & ( (~)
% 0.27/0.49          @ ( R
% 0.27/0.49            = ( ^ [X: $i,Y: $i] : $true ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.49  ------------------------
% 1.69/1.43  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.69/1.43  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.69/1.43  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 05:51:56 EST 2026
% 1.69/1.43  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.69/1.43  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.69/1.43  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.69/1.43  
% 1.69/1.43  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hNY4QMFKCz/DTF2DTF19076.p
% See solution above
% 1.69/1.43  ------------------------
% 1.69/1.44  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.69/1.44  thf(numbers,type,
% 1.69/1.44      num: $tType ).
% 1.69/1.44  
% 1.69/1.44  thf(husband_THFTYPE_IiioI,type,
% 1.69/1.44      husband_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).
% 1.69/1.44  
% 1.69/1.44  thf(lChris_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 1.69/1.44      lChris_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 1.69/1.44  
% 1.69/1.44  thf(lCorina_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 1.69/1.44      lCorina_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 1.69/1.44  
% 1.69/1.44  thf(wife_THFTYPE_IiioI,type,
% 1.69/1.44      wife_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).
% 1.69/1.44  
% 1.69/1.44  thf(inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI,type,
% 1.69/1.44      inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
% 1.69/1.44  
% 1.69/1.44  thf(ax,axiom,
% 1.69/1.44      inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ wife_THFTYPE_IiioI ).
% 1.69/1.44  
% 1.69/1.44  thf(ax_001,axiom,
% 1.69/1.44      ! [REL2: $i > $i > $o,REL1: $i > $i > $o] :
% 1.69/1.44        ( ( inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ REL1 @ REL2 )
% 1.69/1.44       => ! [INST1: $i,INST2: $i] :
% 1.69/1.44            ( ( REL1 @ INST1 @ INST2 )
% 1.69/1.44          <=> ( REL2 @ INST2 @ INST1 ) ) ) ).
% 1.69/1.44  
% 1.69/1.44  thf(ax_002,axiom,
% 1.69/1.44      ? [X: $i] : ( (~) @ ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ X ) ) ).
% 1.69/1.44  
% 1.69/1.44  thf(ax_003,axiom,
% 1.69/1.44      wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i ).
% 1.69/1.44  
% 1.69/1.44  thf(con,conjecture,
% 1.69/1.44      ? [R: $i > $i > $o] :
% 1.69/1.44        ( ( R @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i )
% 1.69/1.44        & ( (~)
% 1.69/1.44          @ ( R
% 1.69/1.44            = ( ^ [X: $i,Y: $i] : $true ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.69/1.44  ------------------------
% 1.69/1.46  % (19197)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_19076 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.69/1.46  % (19200)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_19076 for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 1.69/1.46  % (19198)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_19076 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.69/1.46  % (19194)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_19076 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 1.69/1.46  % (19199)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_19076 for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 1.69/1.46  % (19196)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_19076 for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 1.69/1.46  % (19195)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_19076 for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 1.69/1.46  % (19197)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.69/1.46  % (19197)------------------------------
% 1.69/1.46  % (19197)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.69/1.46  % (19197)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.69/1.46  % (19197)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.69/1.46  % (19198)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.69/1.46  % (19198)------------------------------
% 1.69/1.46  % (19198)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.69/1.46  % (19198)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.69/1.46  % (19198)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.69/1.46  
% 1.69/1.46  % (19198)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.69/1.46  % (19198)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.69/1.46  % (19198)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.69/1.46  % (19198)------------------------------
% 1.69/1.46  % (19198)------------------------------
% 1.69/1.46  
% 1.69/1.46  % (19197)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 1.69/1.46  % (19197)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.69/1.46  % (19197)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.69/1.46  % (19197)------------------------------
% 1.69/1.46  % (19197)------------------------------
% 1.69/1.46  % (19195)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.69/1.46  % (19195)------------------------------
% 1.69/1.46  % (19195)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.69/1.46  % (19195)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.69/1.46  % (19195)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.69/1.46  
% 1.69/1.46  % (19195)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.69/1.46  % (19195)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.69/1.46  % (19195)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 1.69/1.46  % (19195)------------------------------
% 1.69/1.46  % (19195)------------------------------
% 1.69/1.47  % (19200)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.69/1.47  % (19200)------------------------------
% 1.69/1.47  % (19200)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.69/1.47  % (19200)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.69/1.47  % (19200)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.69/1.47  
% 1.69/1.47  % (19200)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 1.69/1.47  % (19200)Time elapsed: 0.012 s
% 1.69/1.47  % (19200)Instructions burned: 19 (million)
% 1.69/1.47  % (19200)------------------------------
% 1.69/1.47  % (19200)------------------------------
% 1.69/1.47  % (19196)First to succeed.
% 1.69/1.48  % (19196)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.69/1.48  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_19076
% 1.69/1.48  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_19076
% 1.69/1.48  thf(func_def_0, type, num: $tType).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(func_def_1, type, husband_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(func_def_4, type, wife_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(func_def_5, type, inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(func_def_8, type, vEPSILON: !>[X0: $tType]:((X0 > $o) > X0)).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(func_def_15, type, ph2: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f230,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    $false),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f187,f229])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f229,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    ~spl1_3),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f228])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f228,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    $false | ~spl1_3),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f209])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f209,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    ($true = $false) | ~spl1_3),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f29,f202])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f202,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($true = (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X2))) ) | ~spl1_3),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f201])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f201,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X2) = ((^[Y0 : $i]: ($true)) @ X2))) ) | ~spl1_3),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(argument_congruence,[status(thm)],[f194])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f194,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    ( ! [X1 : $i] : (((^[Y0 : $i]: ($true)) = (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1))) ) | ~spl1_3),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f193])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f193,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    ( ! [X1 : $i] : ((((^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: ($true)))) @ X1) = (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1))) ) | ~spl1_3),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(argument_congruence,[status(thm)],[f67])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f67,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI = (^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: ($true))))) | ~spl1_3),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f65])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f65,definition,(
% 1.69/1.48    spl1_3 <=> (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI = (^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: ($true)))))),
% 1.69/1.48    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_3])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f29,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    ((husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ sK0) = $false)),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f22])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f22,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    ($true = (~ (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ sK0)))),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f21])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f21,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    ($true = (~ (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ sK0)))),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f9,f20])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f20,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    ? [X0 : $i] : ((~ (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ X0)) = $true) => ($true = (~ (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ sK0)))),
% 1.69/1.48    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    ? [X0 : $i] : ((~ (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ X0)) = $true)),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f8])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    ? [X0 : $i] : (~ (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ X0))),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f3,axiom,(
% 1.69/1.48    ? [X4 : $i] : (~ (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ X4))),
% 1.69/1.48    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hNY4QMFKCz/DTF2THF_19076.p',ax_002)).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f187,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    spl1_3),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f42,f65])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f42,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI = (^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: ($true)))))),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f41])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f41,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI = (^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: ($true))))) | ($true != $true)),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f28,f39])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f39,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    ($true = (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i))),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f37])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f37,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    ($true = (husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i)) | ($true = $false)),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f23,f33])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f33,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ X1) = $false) | ((husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X0) = $true)) )),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f32])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f32,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ X1) = $false) | ((husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X0) = $true) | ($true != $true)) )),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f30,f25])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f25,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    ((inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ wife_THFTYPE_IiioI) = $true)),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    ((inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ wife_THFTYPE_IiioI) = $true)),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    (inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ wife_THFTYPE_IiioI)),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f1,axiom,(
% 1.69/1.48    (inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ wife_THFTYPE_IiioI)),
% 1.69/1.48    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hNY4QMFKCz/DTF2THF_19076.p',ax)).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f30,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    ( ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i,X0 : $i > $i > $o,X1 : $i > $i > $o] : (((inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X1 @ X0) != $true) | ((X0 @ X3 @ X2) = $false) | ((X1 @ X2 @ X3) = $true)) )),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f26])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f26,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    ( ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i,X0 : $i > $i > $o,X1 : $i > $i > $o] : (((X1 @ X2 @ X3) = (X0 @ X3 @ X2)) | ((inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X1 @ X0) != $true)) )),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f18])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f18,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    ! [X0 : $i > $i > $o,X1 : $i > $i > $o] : (((inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X1 @ X0) != $true) | ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i] : ((X1 @ X2 @ X3) = (X0 @ X3 @ X2)))),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f15])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    ! [X0 : $i > $i > $o,X1 : $i > $i > $o] : (((inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X1 @ X0) = $true) => ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i] : ((X1 @ X2 @ X3) = (X0 @ X3 @ X2)))),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f14])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    ! [X0 : $i > $i > $o,X1 : $i > $i > $o] : ((inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X1 @ X0) => ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i] : ((X1 @ X2 @ X3) <=> (X0 @ X3 @ X2)))),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f2,axiom,(
% 1.69/1.48    ! [X0 : $i > $i > $o,X1 : $i > $i > $o] : ((inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X1 @ X0) => ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i] : ((X1 @ X2 @ X3) <=> (X0 @ X3 @ X2)))),
% 1.69/1.48    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hNY4QMFKCz/DTF2THF_19076.p',ax_001)).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f23,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    ((wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f17])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f17,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    ((wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f16])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    (wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i)),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f4,axiom,(
% 1.69/1.48    (wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i)),
% 1.69/1.48    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hNY4QMFKCz/DTF2THF_19076.p',ax_003)).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f28,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    ( ! [X0 : $i > $i > $o] : (($true != (X0 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i)) | ((^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: ($true)))) = X0)) )),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f27])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f27,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    ( ! [X0 : $i > $i > $o] : (($true != (X0 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i)) | ($true = ((^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: ($true)))) = X0))) )),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f24])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f24,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    ( ! [X0 : $i > $i > $o] : (($true != (X0 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i)) | ($true != (~ ((^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: ($true)))) = X0)))) )),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f19])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f19,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    ! [X0 : $i > $i > $o] : (($true != (~ ((^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: ($true)))) = X0))) | ($true != (X0 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i)))),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f13])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    ~? [X0 : $i > $i > $o] : (($true = (X0 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i)) & ($true = (~ ((^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: ($true)))) = X0))))),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.69/1.48    ~? [X0 : $i > $i > $o] : ((X0 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i) & (~ ((^[X1 : $i, X2 : $i] : ($true)) = X0)))),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f6,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.69/1.48    ~? [X5 : $i > $i > $o] : ((X5 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i) & (~ ((^[X4 : $i, X6 : $i] : ($true)) = X5)))),
% 1.69/1.48    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f5])).
% 1.69/1.48  thf(f5,conjecture,(
% 1.69/1.48    ? [X5 : $i > $i > $o] : ((X5 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i) & (~ ((^[X4 : $i, X6 : $i] : ($true)) = X5)))),
% 1.69/1.48    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hNY4QMFKCz/DTF2THF_19076.p',con)).
% 1.69/1.48  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_19076
% 1.69/1.48  % (19196)------------------------------
% 1.69/1.48  % (19196)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.69/1.48  % (19196)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.69/1.48  
% 1.69/1.48  % (19196)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 1.69/1.48  % (19196)Time elapsed: 0.014 s
% 1.69/1.48  % (19196)Instructions burned: 19 (million)
% 1.69/1.48  % (19196)------------------------------
% 1.69/1.48  % (19196)------------------------------
% 1.69/1.48  % (19193)Success in time 0.029 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------