↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : CSR145^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 07:47:00 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.14s 2.31s
% Output   : Refutation 4.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   8 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   21 (   5 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   42 (   7   ~;   0   |;   3   &;  30   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   14 (  14   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (   6   ^;   8   !;   5   ?;  19   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(num_type,type,
    num: $tType ).

thf(husband_THFTYPE_IiioI_decl,type,
    husband_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(lChris_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    lChris_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lCorina_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    lCorina_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(wife_THFTYPE_IiioI_decl,type,
    wife_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI_decl,type,
    inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(3,axiom,
    inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ wife_THFTYPE_IiioI,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax) ).

thf(10,plain,
    inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ wife_THFTYPE_IiioI,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ~ ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_002) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ~ ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_003) ).

thf(17,plain,
    wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ? [A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( A @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i )
      & ( A
       != ( ^ [B: $i,C: $i] : $true ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [A: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ( A @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i )
        & ( A
         != ( ^ [B: $i,C: $i] : $true ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ~ ? [A: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ( A @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i )
        & ( A
         != ( ^ [B: $i,C: $i] : $true ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: $i > $i > $o,B: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ B @ A )
     => ! [C: $i,D: $i] :
          ( ( B @ C @ D )
          = ( A @ D @ C ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_001) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i > $o,B: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ B @ A )
     => ! [C: $i,D: $i] :
          ( ( B @ C @ D )
          = ( A @ D @ C ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[10,14,17,7,11]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : CSR145^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.10/0.21  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.21  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.21  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.21  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.21  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.21  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.21  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.21  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 18:02:51 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.21  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.21  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.02/0.83  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.43/1.05  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (212ms). 
% 1.43/1.06  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.32/1.52  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.32/1.53  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.49/1.61  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 4 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.49/1.65  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 4 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.49/1.67  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.49/1.67  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.49/1.68  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 4.14/2.30  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.14/2.30  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 4.14/2.30  % Time passed: 1955ms (effective reasoning time: 1233ms)
% 4.14/2.30  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.14/2.30  % Axioms used in derivation (4): ax, ax_002, ax_003, ax_001
% 4.14/2.30  % No. of inferences in proof: 12
% 4.14/2.31  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1955 ms resp. 1233 ms w/o parsing
% 4.14/2.37  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.14/2.37  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------