%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR146^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 07:46:40 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 0.27s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 31 ( 8 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 96 ( 2 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 24 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 328 ( 58 ~; 51 |; 14 &; 202 @)
% ( 2 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 17 ( 7 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 32 ( 32 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 12 ( 9 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 51 ( 4 ^; 42 !; 5 ?; 51 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_23,type,
holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o ).
thf(decl_24,type,
lChris_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(decl_25,type,
lCorina_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(decl_26,type,
lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i ).
thf(decl_27,type,
n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(decl_28,type,
wife_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_29,type,
husband_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_30,type,
inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(decl_31,type,
esk1_0: $i ).
thf(con,conjecture,
? [X7: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( X7 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i ) )
& ( X7
!= ( ^ [X6: $i,X8: $i] : $true ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bNr6PzaxCA/E---3.1_427417.p',con) ).
thf(ax3,axiom,
! [X5: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X5 @ $true ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bNr6PzaxCA/E---3.1_427417.p',ax3) ).
thf(ax2,axiom,
! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X2: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X2 @ X1 )
=> ! [X3: $i,X4: $i] :
( ( X2 @ X3 @ X4 )
<=> ( X1 @ X4 @ X3 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bNr6PzaxCA/E---3.1_427417.p',ax2) ).
thf(ax4,axiom,
? [X6: $i] :
~ ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ X6 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bNr6PzaxCA/E---3.1_427417.p',ax4) ).
thf(ax1,axiom,
inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ wife_THFTYPE_IiioI,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bNr6PzaxCA/E---3.1_427417.p',ax1) ).
thf(ax5,axiom,
holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bNr6PzaxCA/E---3.1_427417.p',ax5) ).
thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X7: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( X7 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i ) )
& ( X7
!= ( ^ [X6: $i,X8: $i] : $true ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X7: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( ~ ( X7 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) )
& ( ( X7 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ) )
& ~ ! [X16: $i,X17: $i] :
( ( X7 @ X16 @ X17 )
<=> $true ) ),
inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).
thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
! [X24: $i > $i > $o,X25: $i,X26: $i] :
( ( ~ ( X24 @ X25 @ X26 )
| $true
| ~ ( X24 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i )
| ( X24 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i ) )
& ( ~ $true
| ( X24 @ X25 @ X26 )
| ~ ( X24 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i )
| ( X24 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i ) )
& ( ~ ( X24 @ X25 @ X26 )
| $true
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false )
| ( X24 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i ) )
& ( ~ $true
| ( X24 @ X25 @ X26 )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false )
| ( X24 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i ) )
& ( ~ ( X24 @ X25 @ X26 )
| $true
| ~ ( X24 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) )
& ( ~ $true
| ( X24 @ X25 @ X26 )
| ~ ( X24 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) )
& ( ~ ( X24 @ X25 @ X26 )
| $true
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) )
& ( ~ $true
| ( X24 @ X25 @ X26 )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
! [X4: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 )
| ~ $true
| ~ ( X1 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
thf(c_0_10,plain,
! [X22: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X22 @ $true ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax3]) ).
thf(c_0_11,plain,
! [X18: $i > $i > $o,X19: $i > $i > $o,X20: $i,X21: $i] :
( ( ~ ( X19 @ X20 @ X21 )
| ( X18 @ X21 @ X20 )
| ~ ( inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X19 @ X18 ) )
& ( ~ ( X18 @ X21 @ X20 )
| ( X19 @ X20 @ X21 )
| ~ ( inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X19 @ X18 ) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_12,plain,
? [X6: $i] :
~ ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ X6 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax4]) ).
thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
! [X4: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 )
| ~ ( X1 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
thf(c_0_14,plain,
! [X3: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X3 @ $true ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
thf(c_0_15,plain,
! [X4: $i,X3: $i,X2: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( X2 @ X4 @ X3 )
| ~ ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 )
| ~ ( inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X2 @ X1 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
thf(c_0_16,plain,
inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ wife_THFTYPE_IiioI,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1]) ).
thf(c_0_17,axiom,
( ( ~ ( wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) )
& ( ( wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ) ) ),
inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax5]) ).
thf(c_0_18,plain,
~ ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ esk1_0 ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])])]) ).
thf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
! [X4: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 )
| ~ ( X1 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i ) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14])]) ).
thf(c_0_20,plain,
! [X4: $i,X3: $i] :
( ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X3 @ X4 )
| ~ ( wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X4 @ X3 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
thf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
( ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 )
| ~ $true
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ~ $true )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
thf(c_0_22,plain,
( ( ~ ( wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) )
& ( ( wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
thf(c_0_23,plain,
~ ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ esk1_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
thf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i,X4: $i] :
( ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X3 @ X4 )
| ~ ( wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
thf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
( ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ~ $true ) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
thf(c_0_26,plain,
( ( wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ~ $true ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
thf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
~ ( wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
thf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
( ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ~ $true ) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_14])]) ).
thf(c_0_29,plain,
holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ~ $true,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
thf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(flex_resolve,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29])])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR146^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.18 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.18 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.18 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.18 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.18 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.18 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.18 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.18 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 17:58:56 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.18 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.18 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.23 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.25 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bNr6PzaxCA/E---3.1_427417.p
% 0.23/0.27 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.23/0.27 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.23/0.27 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.27 % Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.27 % Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.27 % Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.27 % Starting post_as_ho4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.27 % Starting post_as_ho2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.27 % Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.27 % Starting full_lambda_10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.27 % Starting new_ho_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.27 % post_as_ho12 with pid 427430 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.27 % Result found by post_as_ho12
% 0.23/0.27 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.23/0.27 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.27 % Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.27 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.23/0.27 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/0.27 % Search class: HGUNF-FFSF11-SSSFFMBN
% 0.23/0.27 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.27 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.27 % SubtermCWHack with pid 427438 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.27 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.23/0.27 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.23/0.27 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.27 % Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.27 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.23/0.27 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/0.27 % Search class: HGUNF-FFSF11-SSSFFMBN
% 0.23/0.27 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.27 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.27 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.23/0.27
% 0.23/0.27 % Proof found!
% 0.23/0.27 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/0.27 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.27 % Parsed axioms : 15
% 0.23/0.27 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.23/0.27 % Initial clauses : 24
% 0.23/0.27 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 14
% 0.23/0.27 % Initial clauses in saturation : 10
% 0.23/0.27 % Processed clauses : 17
% 0.23/0.27 % ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.23/0.27 % ...subsumed : 1
% 0.23/0.27 % ...remaining for further processing : 14
% 0.23/0.27 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/0.27 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/0.27 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.23/0.27 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.23/0.27 % Generated clauses : 9
% 0.23/0.27 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 9
% 0.23/0.27 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.27 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/0.27 % Paramodulations : 8
% 0.23/0.27 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/0.27 % NegExts : 0
% 0.23/0.27 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/0.27 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.23/0.27 % Total rewrite steps : 4
% 0.23/0.27 % ...of those cached : 2
% 0.23/0.27 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.23/0.27 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.23/0.27 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.27 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.27 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.27 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.23/0.27 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.27 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.27 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.27 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.27 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.27 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.27 % Current number of processed clauses : 11
% 0.23/0.27 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.23/0.27 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.27 % Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.23/0.27 % Non-unit-clauses : 5
% 0.23/0.27 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
% 0.23/0.27 % ...number of literals in the above : 4
% 0.23/0.27 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/0.27 % Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.23/0.27 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 14
% 0.23/0.27 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13
% 0.23/0.27 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.23/0.27 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.23/0.27 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/0.27 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.23/0.27 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.23/0.27 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.27 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/0.27 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1185
% 0.23/0.27 % Search garbage collected termcells : 189
% 0.23/0.27
% 0.23/0.27 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.27 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.23/0.27 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.23/0.27 % Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.23/0.27 % Maximum resident set size: 3640 pages
% 0.23/0.27
% 0.23/0.27 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.27 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.23/0.27 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.23/0.27 % Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.23/0.27 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.23/0.27 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------