↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : CSR146^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 07:47:00 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 6.23s 3.11s
% Output   : Refutation 6.67s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (   9 unt;   0 typ;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   64 (  15 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  118 (  15   ~;   5   |;   3   &;  93   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   22 (  22   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   12 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (  26   ^;  16   !;   5   ?;  48   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   1  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(num_type,type,
    num: $tType ).

thf(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI_decl,type,
    holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o ).

thf(lChris_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    lChris_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lCorina_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    lCorina_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI_decl,type,
    lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i ).

thf(n2009_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(wife_THFTYPE_IiioI_decl,type,
    wife_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(husband_THFTYPE_IiioI_decl,type,
    husband_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI_decl,type,
    inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: $i ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ~ ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ A ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ? [A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( A @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i ) )
      & ( A
       != ( ^ [B: $i,C: $i] : $true ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [A: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( A @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i ) )
        & ( A
         != ( ^ [B: $i,C: $i] : $true ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ~ ? [A: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( A @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i ) )
        & ( A
         != ( ^ [B: $i,C: $i] : $true ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( A @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i ) )
      | ( A
        = ( ^ [B: $i,C: $i] : $true ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[8]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( A
        = ( ^ [B: $i,C: $i] : $true ) )
      | ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( A @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax5) ).

thf(20,plain,
    holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( A
        = ( ^ [B: $i,C: $i] : $true ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i ) )
       != ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( A @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[20,10]) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( A
        = ( ^ [B: $i,C: $i] : $true ) )
      | ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i ) )
       != ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( A @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[23]) ).

thf(37,plain,
    ( ( ^ [A: $i,B: $i] : ( wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ B @ A ) )
    = ( ^ [A: $i,B: $i] : $true ) ),
    inference(pre_uni,[status(thm)],[24:[bind(A,$thf( ^ [B: $i] : ^ [C: $i] : ( wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ C @ B ) ))]]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ~ ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax4) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ~ ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: $i > $i > $o,B: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ B @ A )
     => ! [C: $i,D: $i] :
          ( ( B @ C @ D )
          = ( A @ D @ C ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i > $o,B: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ B @ A )
     => ! [C: $i,D: $i] :
          ( ( B @ C @ D )
          = ( A @ D @ C ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(35,plain,
    ( ( ^ [A: $i,B: $i] : ( wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ B @ lChris_THFTYPE_i ) )
    = ( ^ [A: $i,B: $i] : $true ) ),
    inference(pre_uni,[status(thm)],[24:[bind(A,$thf( ^ [B: $i] : ^ [C: $i] : ( wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ C @ lChris_THFTYPE_i ) ))]]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ $true ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ $true ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ $true ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[15]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ wife_THFTYPE_IiioI,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1) ).

thf(11,plain,
    inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ wife_THFTYPE_IiioI,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(36,plain,
    ( ( ^ [A: $i,B: $i] : ( wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ A ) )
    = ( ^ [A: $i,B: $i] : $true ) ),
    inference(pre_uni,[status(thm)],[24:[bind(A,$thf( ^ [B: $i] : ^ [C: $i] : ( wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ B ) ))]]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i] : ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ A ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ~ ( husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ sk1 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[18]) ).

thf(232,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[10,37,20,17,12,35,16,11,8,15,36,19]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : CSR146^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.09  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.12/0.29  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.29  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.29  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.29  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.29  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.29  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 17:55:11 UTC 2026
% 0.27/0.29  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.27/0.29  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.95/0.86  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.30/1.06  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (194ms). 
% 1.30/1.07  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.90/1.46  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.90/1.47  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.11/1.56  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 5 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.25/1.60  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 5 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.25/1.62  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.25/1.62  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.25/1.63  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 6.23/3.11  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 6.23/3.11  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 6.23/3.11  % Time passed: 2674ms (effective reasoning time: 2026ms)
% 6.23/3.11  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 6.23/3.11  % Axioms used in derivation (5): ax4, ax1, ax2, ax3, ax5
% 6.23/3.11  % No. of inferences in proof: 24
% 6.23/3.11  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2674 ms resp. 2026 ms w/o parsing
% 6.67/3.15  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 6.67/3.15  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------