%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : CSR147+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n021.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 05:03:03 EDT 2024 % Result : Theorem 0.98s 1.08s % Output : CNFRefutation 1.07s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.10/0.12 % Problem : CSR147+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0. % 0.10/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 19 20:05:24 EDT 2024 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.21/0.58 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.98/1.07 %------------------------------------------- % 0.98/1.07 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.98/1.07 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.98/1.07 % Transform :cnf % 0.98/1.07 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.98/1.07 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.98/1.07 % 0.98/1.07 % Result :Theorem 0.460000s % 0.98/1.07 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.460000s % 0.98/1.07 %------------------------------------------- % 0.98/1.07 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.98/1.07 % File : CSR147+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0. % 0.98/1.07 % Domain : Commonsense Reasoning % 0.98/1.07 % Problem : My experienced brother % 0.98/1.07 % Version : Especial. % 0.98/1.07 % English : An older human sibling is more experienced than a younger one, or % 0.98/1.07 % the younger one has seen more of the world. % 0.98/1.07 % 0.98/1.07 % Refs : % 0.98/1.07 % Source : [TPTP] % 0.98/1.07 % Names : % 0.98/1.07 % 0.98/1.07 % Status : Theorem % 0.98/1.07 % Rating : 0.08 v8.1.0, 0.06 v7.4.0, 0.07 v7.2.0, 0.03 v7.1.0, 0.04 v7.0.0, 0.03 v6.4.0, 0.08 v6.3.0, 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.04 v6.1.0, 0.10 v6.0.0, 0.04 v5.4.0, 0.07 v5.3.0, 0.15 v5.2.0, 0.00 v4.1.0 % 0.98/1.07 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 10 unt; 0 def) % 0.98/1.07 % Number of atoms : 24 ( 3 equ) % 0.98/1.07 % Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 1 avg) % 0.98/1.07 % Number of connectives : 11 ( 1 ~; 1 |; 3 &) % 0.98/1.07 % ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>) % 0.98/1.07 % Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 2 avg) % 0.98/1.07 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg) % 0.98/1.07 % Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty) % 0.98/1.07 % Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-1 aty) % 0.98/1.07 % Number of variables : 9 ( 7 !; 2 ?) % 0.98/1.07 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ % 0.98/1.07 % 0.98/1.07 % Comments : % 0.98/1.07 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.98/1.07 fof(human_type,axiom, % 0.98/1.07 ? [A] : s__Human(A) ). % 0.98/1.07 % 0.98/1.07 fof(living_type,axiom, % 0.98/1.07 ? [A] : s__LivingThing(A) ). % 0.98/1.07 % 0.98/1.07 fof(humans_are_living,axiom, % 0.98/1.08 ! [A] : % 0.98/1.08 ( s__Human(A) % 0.98/1.08 => s__LivingThing(A) ) ). % 0.98/1.08 % 0.98/1.08 fof(geoff_human,axiom, % 0.98/1.08 s__Human(geoff) ). % 0.98/1.08 % 0.98/1.08 fof(jim_human,axiom, % 0.98/1.08 s__Human(jim) ). % 0.98/1.08 % 0.98/1.08 fof(sibling_type,axiom, % 0.98/1.08 ! [A] : % 0.98/1.08 ( s__Human(A) % 0.98/1.08 => s__Human(s__siblingFn(A)) ) ). % 0.98/1.08 % 0.98/1.08 fof(experience,axiom, % 0.98/1.08 ! [O,OAge,YAge] : % 0.98/1.08 ( s__Human(O) % 0.98/1.08 => ( ( s__age(O,OAge) % 0.98/1.08 & s__age(s__siblingFn(O),YAge) % 0.98/1.08 & greater(OAge,YAge) ) % 0.98/1.08 => ( s__more_experienced(O,s__siblingFn(O)) % 0.98/1.08 | s__has_seen_more(s__siblingFn(O),O) ) ) ) ). % 0.98/1.08 % 0.98/1.08 fof(sibling_symmetry,axiom, % 0.98/1.08 ! [X,Y] : % 0.98/1.08 ( ( s__Human(X) % 0.98/1.08 & s__Human(Y) ) % 0.98/1.08 => ( X = s__siblingFn(Y) % 0.98/1.08 => Y = s__siblingFn(X) ) ) ). % 0.98/1.08 % 0.98/1.08 fof(geoff_48,axiom, % 0.98/1.08 s__age(geoff,n48) ). % 0.98/1.08 % 0.98/1.08 fof(jim_54,axiom, % 0.98/1.08 s__age(jim,n54) ). % 0.98/1.08 % 0.98/1.08 fof(greater_54_48,axiom, % 0.98/1.08 greater(n54,n48) ). % 0.98/1.08 % 0.98/1.08 fof(geoff_and_jim,axiom, % 0.98/1.08 geoff = s__siblingFn(jim) ). % 0.98/1.08 % 0.98/1.08 fof(jim_has_seen_more,axiom, % 0.98/1.08 ~ s__has_seen_more(geoff,jim) ). % 0.98/1.08 % 0.98/1.08 fof(jim_is_experienced,conjecture, % 0.98/1.08 s__more_experienced(jim,geoff) ). % 0.98/1.08 % 0.98/1.08 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.98/1.08 %------------------------------------------- % 0.98/1.08 % Proof found % 0.98/1.08 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.98/1.08 % SZS output start Proof % 0.98/1.08 %ClaNum:28(EqnAxiom:14) % 0.98/1.08 %VarNum:21(SingletonVarNum:7) % 0.98/1.08 %MaxLitNum:6 % 0.98/1.08 %MaxfuncDepth:1 % 0.98/1.08 %SharedTerms:17 % 0.98/1.08 %goalClause: 23 % 0.98/1.08 %singleGoalClaCount:1 % 0.98/1.08 [16]P1(a2) % 0.98/1.08 [17]P1(a1) % 0.98/1.08 [18]P1(a3) % 0.98/1.08 [19]P3(a4) % 0.98/1.08 [20]P4(a2,a6) % 0.98/1.08 [21]P4(a1,a7) % 0.98/1.08 [22]P2(a7,a6) % 0.98/1.08 [23]~P5(a1,a2) % 0.98/1.08 [24]~P6(a2,a1) % 0.98/1.08 [15]E(f5(a1),a2) % 0.98/1.08 [25]~P1(x251)+P3(x251) % 0.98/1.08 [26]~P1(x261)+P1(f5(x261)) % 0.98/1.08 [27]~P1(x271)+~P1(x272)+~E(x272,f5(x271))+E(x271,f5(x272)) % 0.98/1.08 [28]~P1(x281)+~P4(x281,x282)+~P2(x282,x283)+P6(f5(x281),x281)+~P4(f5(x281),x283)+P5(x281,f5(x281)) % 0.98/1.08 %EqnAxiom % 0.98/1.08 [1]E(x11,x11) % 0.98/1.08 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22) % 0.98/1.08 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33) % 0.98/1.08 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f5(x41),f5(x42)) % 0.98/1.08 [5]~P1(x51)+P1(x52)+~E(x51,x52) % 0.98/1.08 [6]P4(x62,x63)+~E(x61,x62)+~P4(x61,x63) % 0.98/1.08 [7]P4(x73,x72)+~E(x71,x72)+~P4(x73,x71) % 0.98/1.08 [8]P2(x82,x83)+~E(x81,x82)+~P2(x81,x83) % 0.98/1.08 [9]P2(x93,x92)+~E(x91,x92)+~P2(x93,x91) % 0.98/1.08 [10]~P3(x101)+P3(x102)+~E(x101,x102) % 0.98/1.08 [11]P5(x112,x113)+~E(x111,x112)+~P5(x111,x113) % 0.98/1.08 [12]P5(x123,x122)+~E(x121,x122)+~P5(x123,x121) % 0.98/1.08 [13]P6(x132,x133)+~E(x131,x132)+~P6(x131,x133) % 0.98/1.08 [14]P6(x143,x142)+~E(x141,x142)+~P6(x143,x141) % 0.98/1.08 % 0.98/1.08 %------------------------------------------- % 1.07/1.08 cnf(29,plain, % 1.07/1.08 (~P1(x291)+~P1(f5(x291))+E(x291,f5(f5(x291)))), % 1.07/1.08 inference(equality_inference,[],[27])). % 1.07/1.08 cnf(31,plain, % 1.07/1.08 (P1(f5(a1))), % 1.07/1.08 inference(scs_inference,[],[15,16,2,5])). % 1.07/1.08 cnf(32,plain, % 1.07/1.08 (P4(f5(a1),a6)), % 1.07/1.08 inference(scs_inference,[],[15,16,20,2,5,6])). % 1.07/1.08 cnf(33,plain, % 1.07/1.08 (E(a1,f5(a2))), % 1.07/1.08 inference(scs_inference,[],[15,16,17,20,2,5,6,27])). % 1.07/1.08 cnf(35,plain, % 1.07/1.08 (E(a1,f5(f5(a1)))), % 1.07/1.08 inference(scs_inference,[],[15,16,17,20,2,5,6,27,29])). % 1.07/1.08 cnf(51,plain, % 1.07/1.08 (P2(a7,x511)+~E(a6,x511)), % 1.07/1.08 inference(scs_inference,[],[33,35,31,32,21,16,17,22,2,5,3,6,27,29,7,9])). % 1.07/1.08 cnf(69,plain, % 1.07/1.08 (E(f5(f5(a1)),a1)), % 1.07/1.08 inference(scs_inference,[],[35,2])). % 1.07/1.08 cnf(126,plain, % 1.07/1.08 (~P5(f5(f5(a1)),f5(a1))), % 1.07/1.08 inference(scs_inference,[],[23,69,15,11,12])). % 1.07/1.08 cnf(181,plain, % 1.07/1.08 (P6(f5(a1),a1)+P5(a1,f5(a1))), % 1.07/1.08 inference(scs_inference,[],[32,17,21,51,28])). % 1.07/1.08 cnf(182,plain, % 1.07/1.08 (P5(a1,f5(a1))), % 1.07/1.08 inference(scs_inference,[],[15,24,181,13])). % 1.07/1.08 cnf(183,plain, % 1.07/1.08 ($false), % 1.07/1.08 inference(scs_inference,[],[126,35,182,11]), % 1.07/1.08 ['proof']). % 1.07/1.08 % SZS output end Proof % 1.07/1.08 % Total time :0.460000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------