↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : CSR148^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 07:46:54 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.71s 3.89s
% Output   : Proof 3.71s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.13  % Problem    : CSR148^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.13/0.15  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.15/0.37  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime   : Thu Oct  2 20:09:53 EDT 2025
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.71/3.89  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.71/3.89  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.71/3.89  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lMary_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) True
% 3.71/3.89  Clause #1 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 3.71/3.89    (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i)
% 3.71/3.89      (∀ (X : Iota), likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lMary_THFTYPE_i X → likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i X))
% 3.71/3.89    True
% 3.71/3.89  Clause #2 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (P : Prop) (Y : Iota), P → holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI Y P) True
% 3.71/3.89  Clause #3 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 3.71/3.89    (Not
% 3.71/3.89      (Exists fun X =>
% 3.71/3.89        Exists fun Y => holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI Y) (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i X)))
% 3.71/3.89    True
% 3.71/3.89  Clause #4 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a : Prop), Eq (∀ (Y : Iota), a → holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI Y a) True
% 3.71/3.89  Clause #5 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a : Prop) (a_1 : Iota), Eq (a → holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI a_1 a) True
% 3.71/3.89  Clause #6 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a : Prop) (a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq a False) (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI a_1 a) True)
% 3.71/3.89  Clause #7 (by identity loobHoist #[6]): ∀ (a : Prop) (a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq a False) (Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI a_1 True) True) (Eq a False))
% 3.71/3.89  Clause #9 (by eliminate duplicate literals #[7]): ∀ (a : Prop) (a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq a False) (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI a_1 True) True)
% 3.71/3.89  Clause #11 (by falseElim #[9]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI a True) True
% 3.71/3.89  Clause #13 (by identity boolHoist #[1]): Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) False) True)
% 3.71/3.89    (Eq (∀ (X : Iota), likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lMary_THFTYPE_i X → likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i X) True)
% 3.71/3.89  Clause #19 (by clausification #[13]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 3.71/3.89    Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) False) True)
% 3.71/3.89      (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lMary_THFTYPE_i a → likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i a) True)
% 3.71/3.89  Clause #20 (by clausification #[19]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 3.71/3.89    Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) False) True)
% 3.71/3.89      (Or (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lMary_THFTYPE_i a) False) (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i a) True))
% 3.71/3.89  Clause #21 (by superposition #[20, 0]): Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) False) True)
% 3.71/3.89    (Or (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) True) (Eq False True))
% 3.71/3.89  Clause #22 (by clausification #[21]): Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) False) True)
% 3.71/3.89    (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) True)
% 3.71/3.89  Clause #23 (by clausification #[3]): Eq
% 3.71/3.89    (Exists fun X =>
% 3.71/3.89      Exists fun Y => holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI Y) (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i X))
% 3.71/3.89    False
% 3.71/3.89  Clause #24 (by clausification #[23]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 3.71/3.89    Eq (Exists fun Y => holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI Y) (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i a)) False
% 3.71/3.89  Clause #25 (by clausification #[24]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI a) (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i a_1)) False
% 3.71/3.89  Clause #26 (by identity loobHoist #[25]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.71/3.89    Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI a) True) False)
% 3.71/3.89      (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i a_1) False)
% 3.71/3.89  Clause #27 (by identity boolHoist #[25]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.71/3.89    Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI a) False) False)
% 3.71/3.89      (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i a_1) True)
% 3.71/3.89  Clause #28 (by superposition #[26, 11]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i a) False) (Eq False True)
% 3.71/3.89  Clause #29 (by clausification #[28]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i a) False
% 3.71/3.89  Clause #30 (by backward demodulation #[29, 22]): Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) False) True) (Eq False True)
% 3.71/3.89  Clause #32 (by clausification #[30]): Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) False) True
% 3.71/3.89  Clause #34 (by superposition #[27, 32]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq True False) (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i a) True)
% 3.71/3.89  Clause #35 (by clausification #[34]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i a) True
% 3.71/3.89  Clause #36 (by superposition #[35, 29]): Eq True False
% 3.71/3.89  Clause #37 (by clausification #[36]): False
% 3.71/3.89  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------