%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : CSR148^3 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NtM6yJ8FfY true
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 04:32:28 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Theorem 0.57s 0.88s
% Output : Refutation 0.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CSR148^3 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v5.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NtM6yJ8FfY true
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 14:51:53 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.35 % Running in HO mode
% 0.55/0.67 % Total configuration time : 828
% 0.55/0.67 % Estimated wc time : 1656
% 0.55/0.67 % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0
% 0.55/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s
% 0.56/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 80s
% 0.56/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 80s
% 0.56/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 30s
% 0.56/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 90s
% 0.56/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 40s
% 0.56/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 70s
% 0.56/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_sp5.sh running for 60s
% 0.57/0.88 % Solved by lams/40_c.s.sh.
% 0.57/0.88 % done 17 iterations in 0.131s
% 0.57/0.88 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.57/0.88 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.57/0.88 thf(lSue_THFTYPE_i_type, type, lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i).
% 0.57/0.88 thf(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI_type, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI:
% 0.57/0.88 $i > $o > $o).
% 0.57/0.88 thf(lMary_THFTYPE_i_type, type, lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i).
% 0.57/0.88 thf(n2009_THFTYPE_i_type, type, n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i).
% 0.57/0.88 thf(lBill_THFTYPE_i_type, type, lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i).
% 0.57/0.88 thf(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI_type, type, lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i).
% 0.57/0.88 thf(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI_type, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.57/0.88 thf(ax, axiom, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)).
% 0.57/0.88 thf(zip_derived_cl134, plain,
% 0.57/0.88 ( (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)),
% 0.57/0.88 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax])).
% 0.57/0.88 thf(ax_001, axiom,
% 0.57/0.88 (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @
% 0.57/0.88 ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @
% 0.57/0.88 ( ![X:$i]:
% 0.57/0.88 ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X ) =>
% 0.57/0.88 ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X ) ) ))).
% 0.57/0.88 thf(zip_derived_cl135, plain,
% 0.57/0.88 ( (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @
% 0.57/0.88 (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @
% 0.57/0.88 (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i]:
% 0.57/0.88 (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) =>
% 0.57/0.88 (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0)))))))),
% 0.57/0.88 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax_001])).
% 0.57/0.88 thf(zip_derived_cl157, plain,
% 0.57/0.88 (![X-81 : $i]:
% 0.57/0.88 ( ((^[Y0 : $i]:
% 0.57/0.88 (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) =>
% 0.57/0.88 (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0)))) @
% 0.57/0.88 X-81)
% 0.57/0.88 | (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @
% 0.57/0.88 (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ($false)))),
% 0.57/0.88 inference('forall_hoist', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl135])).
% 0.57/0.88 thf(zip_derived_cl162, plain,
% 0.57/0.88 (![X-81 : $i]:
% 0.57/0.88 ( (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X-81) =>
% 0.57/0.88 (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X-81)))
% 0.57/0.88 | (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @
% 0.57/0.88 (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ($false)))),
% 0.57/0.88 inference('ho_norm', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl157])).
% 0.57/0.88 thf(zip_derived_cl163, plain,
% 0.57/0.88 (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.57/0.88 ( (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X0) =>
% 0.57/0.88 (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0)))
% 0.57/0.88 | (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @
% 0.57/0.88 (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ($false)))),
% 0.57/0.88 inference('cannonize vars', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl162])).
% 0.57/0.88 thf(zip_derived_cl165, plain,
% 0.57/0.88 (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.57/0.88 ( (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @
% 0.57/0.88 (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ($false))
% 0.57/0.88 | (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0)
% 0.57/0.88 | ~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X0))),
% 0.57/0.88 inference('cnf_otf', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl163])).
% 0.57/0.88 thf(con, conjecture,
% 0.57/0.88 (?[X:$i,Y:$i]:
% 0.57/0.88 ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @
% 0.57/0.88 ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ Y ) @
% 0.57/0.88 ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X ) ))).
% 0.57/0.88 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.57/0.88 (~( ?[X:$i,Y:$i]:
% 0.57/0.88 ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @
% 0.57/0.88 ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ Y ) @
% 0.57/0.88 ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X ) ) )),
% 0.57/0.88 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [con])).
% 0.57/0.88 thf(zip_derived_cl137, plain,
% 0.57/0.88 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.57/0.88 ~ (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X0) @
% 0.57/0.88 (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1))),
% 0.57/0.88 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.57/0.88 thf(zip_derived_cl138, plain,
% 0.57/0.88 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.57/0.88 ( (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1)
% 0.57/0.88 | ~ (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X0) @
% 0.57/0.88 ($false)))),
% 0.57/0.88 inference('bool_hoist', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl137])).
% 0.57/0.88 thf(zip_derived_cl170, plain,
% 0.57/0.88 (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.57/0.88 (~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X0)
% 0.57/0.88 | (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0))),
% 0.57/0.88 inference('clc', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl165, zip_derived_cl138])).
% 0.57/0.88 thf(ax_002, axiom,
% 0.57/0.88 (![P:$o,Y:$i]: ( ( P ) => ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ Y @ P ) ))).
% 0.57/0.88 thf(zip_derived_cl136, plain,
% 0.57/0.88 (![X0 : $o, X1 : $i]: (~ (X0) | (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.57/0.88 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax_002])).
% 0.57/0.88 thf(zip_derived_cl139, plain,
% 0.57/0.88 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.57/0.88 (~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1)
% 0.57/0.88 | ~ (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X0) @
% 0.57/0.88 ($true)))),
% 0.57/0.88 inference('bool_hoist', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl137])).
% 0.57/0.88 thf(zip_derived_cl174, plain,
% 0.57/0.88 (![X1 : $i]: ~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1)),
% 0.57/0.88 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl136, zip_derived_cl139])).
% 0.57/0.88 thf(zip_derived_cl177, plain,
% 0.57/0.88 (![X0 : $i]: ~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X0)),
% 0.57/0.88 inference('clc', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl170, zip_derived_cl174])).
% 0.57/0.88 thf(zip_derived_cl178, plain, ($false),
% 0.57/0.88 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl134, zip_derived_cl177])).
% 0.57/0.88
% 0.57/0.88 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.57/0.88
% 0.57/0.88
% 0.57/0.88 % Terminating...
% 0.63/0.96 % Runner terminated.
% 0.63/0.97 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------