%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem : CSR149^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 08:43:13 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 1.71s 1.41s
% Output : Refutation 1.71s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 15
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 46 ( 13 unt; 0 typ; 4 def)
% Number of atoms : 236 ( 46 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 233 ( 41 ~; 31 |; 0 &; 143 @)
% ( 4 <=>; 9 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Number of types : 3 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 16 ( 12 usr; 11 con; 0-2 aty)
% ( 5 !!; 0 ??; 0 @@+; 0 @@-)
% Number of variables : 59 ( 6 ^; 45 !; 8 ?; 59 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_0,type,
num: $tType ).
thf(func_def_1,type,
holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o ).
thf(func_def_5,type,
lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i ).
thf(func_def_6,type,
likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_16,type,
ph1:
!>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).
thf(f79,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f28,f48,f63,f69,f78]) ).
thf(f78,plain,
~ spl0_1,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f77]) ).
thf(f77,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f24]) ).
thf(f24,plain,
( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X0 )
!= X1 )
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f23]) ).
thf(f23,definition,
( spl0_1
<=> ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X0 )
!= X1 ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).
thf(f69,plain,
~ spl0_3,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f68]) ).
thf(f68,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f64]) ).
thf(f64,plain,
( ( $true = $false )
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f44,f19]) ).
thf(f19,plain,
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
= $true ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).
thf(f10,plain,
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
= $true ),
inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).
thf(f9,plain,
likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i,
inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1]) ).
thf(f1,axiom,
likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xdsim8Bepg/DTF2THF_5774.p',ax) ).
thf(f44,plain,
( ! [X2: $i] :
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X2 )
= $false )
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f43]) ).
thf(f43,definition,
( spl0_3
<=> ! [X2: $i] :
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X2 )
= $false ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).
thf(f63,plain,
~ spl0_4,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f62]) ).
thf(f62,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_4 ),
inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f47]) ).
thf(f47,plain,
( ! [X0: $i] : ( n2009_THFTYPE_i != X0 )
| ~ spl0_4 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f46]) ).
thf(f46,definition,
( spl0_4
<=> ! [X0: $i] : ( n2009_THFTYPE_i != X0 ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).
thf(f48,plain,
( spl0_3
| spl0_4
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f41,f26,f46,f43]) ).
thf(f26,definition,
( spl0_2
<=> ! [X2: $i] :
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X2 )
!= $true ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).
thf(f41,plain,
( ! [X2: $i,X0: $i] :
( ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X2 )
= $false )
| ( n2009_THFTYPE_i != X0 ) )
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f40,f27]) ).
thf(f27,plain,
( ! [X2: $i] :
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X2 )
!= $true )
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f26]) ).
thf(f40,plain,
( ! [X2: $i,X0: $i] :
( ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X2 )
= $false )
| ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X2 )
= $true )
| ( n2009_THFTYPE_i != X0 ) )
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f39,f27]) ).
thf(f39,plain,
! [X2: $i,X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1 )
= $true )
| ( n2009_THFTYPE_i != X0 )
| ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X2 )
= $false )
| ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X2 )
= $true ) ),
inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f38]) ).
thf(f38,plain,
! [X2: $i,X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X2 )
=> ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X2 ) )
= $true )
| ( n2009_THFTYPE_i != X0 )
| ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1 )
= $true ) ),
inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f37]) ).
thf(f37,plain,
! [X2: $i,X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( n2009_THFTYPE_i != X0 )
| ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1 )
= $true )
| ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0 )
=> ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0 ) )
@ X2 )
= $true ) ),
inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f31]) ).
thf(f31,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( $true
= ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0 )
=> ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0 ) ) ) )
| ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1 )
= $true )
| ( n2009_THFTYPE_i != X0 ) ),
inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f30]) ).
thf(f30,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1 )
!= ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0 )
=> ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0 ) ) ) )
| ( n2009_THFTYPE_i != X0 ) ),
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f29]) ).
thf(f29,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( $true != $true )
| ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1 )
!= ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0 )
=> ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0 ) ) ) )
| ( n2009_THFTYPE_i != X0 ) ),
inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f17,f16]) ).
thf(f16,plain,
( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
@ ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0 )
=> ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0 ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8]) ).
thf(f8,plain,
( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
@ ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0 )
=> ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0 ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).
thf(f7,plain,
( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
@ ! [X0: $i] :
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X0 )
=> ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0 ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3]) ).
thf(f3,axiom,
( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
@ ! [X1: $i] :
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X1 )
=> ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xdsim8Bepg/DTF2THF_5774.p',ax_002) ).
thf(f17,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X1 ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0 ) )
!= $true ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f15]) ).
thf(f15,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X1 ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0 ) )
!= $true ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).
thf(f12,plain,
~ ? [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X1 ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0 ) )
= $true ),
inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).
thf(f11,plain,
~ ? [X0: $i,X1: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X1 ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0 ) ),
inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).
thf(f5,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1: $i,X0: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X0 ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1 ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f4]) ).
thf(f4,conjecture,
? [X1: $i,X0: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X0 ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xdsim8Bepg/DTF2THF_5774.p',con) ).
thf(f28,plain,
( spl0_1
| spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f21,f26,f23]) ).
thf(f21,plain,
! [X2: $i,X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X0 )
!= X1 )
| ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X2 )
!= $true ) ),
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f20]) ).
thf(f20,plain,
! [X2: $i,X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X0 )
!= X1 )
| ( $true != $true )
| ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X2 )
!= $true ) ),
inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f17,f18]) ).
thf(f18,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X0 @ $true )
= $true ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f14]) ).
thf(f14,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X0 @ $true )
= $true ),
inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f13]) ).
thf(f13,plain,
! [X0: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X0 @ $true ),
inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).
thf(f2,axiom,
! [X0: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X0 @ $true ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xdsim8Bepg/DTF2THF_5774.p',ax_001) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : CSR149^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.16/0.34 % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 05:56:48 EST 2026
% 0.16/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.34 Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.21/0.46 ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.21/0.46 thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.21/0.46 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.46 % File : CSR149^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.21/0.46 % Domain : Commonsense Reasoning
% 0.21/0.46 % Problem : Elegantly, is there a year in which Sue liked somebody?
% 0.21/0.46 % Version : Especial > Reduced > Especial.
% 0.21/0.46 % English : What holds that holds at all times (elegantly expressed). Mary
% 0.21/0.46 % likes Bill. During 2009 Sue liked whoever Mary liked. Is there a
% 0.21/0.46 % year in which Sue liked somebody?
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46 % Refs : [PS07] Pease & Sutcliffe (2007), First Order Reasoning on a L
% 0.21/0.46 % : [BP10] Benzmueller & Pease (2010), Progress in Automating Hig
% 0.21/0.46 % : [Ben10] Benzmueller (2010), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.21/0.46 % Source : [Ben10]
% 0.21/0.46 % Names : paar_5.tq_SUMO_local [Ben10]
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46 % Status : Theorem
% 0.21/0.46 % Rating : 0.08 v9.1.0, 0.12 v9.0.0, 0.08 v8.2.0, 0.09 v8.1.0, 0.08 v7.4.0, 0.11 v7.3.0, 0.10 v7.2.0, 0.12 v7.1.0, 0.14 v7.0.0, 0.12 v6.4.0, 0.14 v6.3.0, 0.17 v6.2.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.50 v6.0.0, 0.00 v5.4.0, 0.25 v5.3.0, 0.50 v4.1.0
% 0.21/0.46 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 1 unt; 8 typ; 0 def)
% 0.21/0.46 % Number of atoms : 8 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% 0.21/0.46 % Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% 0.21/0.46 % Number of connectives : 17 ( 0 ~; 0 |; 0 &; 16 @)
% 0.21/0.46 % ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.21/0.46 % Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 5 avg)
% 0.21/0.46 % Number of types : 3 ( 1 usr)
% 0.21/0.46 % Number of type conns : 5 ( 5 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% 0.21/0.46 % Number of symbols : 8 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.21/0.46 % Number of variables : 4 ( 0 ^; 2 !; 2 ?; 4 :)
% 0.21/0.46 % SPC : TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46 % Comments : This is a simple test problem for reasoning in/about SUMO.
% 0.21/0.46 % Initally the problem has been hand generated in KIF syntax in
% 0.21/0.46 % SigmaKEE and then automatically translated by Benzmueller's
% 0.21/0.46 % KIF2TH0 translator into THF syntax.
% 0.21/0.46 % : The translation has been applied in two modes: local and SInE.
% 0.21/0.46 % The local mode only translates the local assumptions and the
% 0.21/0.46 % query. The SInE mode additionally translates the SInE-extract
% 0.21/0.46 % of the loaded knowledge base (usually SUMO).
% 0.21/0.46 % : The examples are selected to illustrate the benefits of
% 0.21/0.46 % higher-order reasoning in ontology reasoning.
% 0.21/0.46 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.46 %----The extracted Signature
% 0.21/0.46 thf(numbers,type,
% 0.21/0.46 num: $tType ).
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46 thf(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI,type,
% 0.21/0.46 holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o ).
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46 thf(lBill_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 0.21/0.46 lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46 thf(lMary_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 0.21/0.46 lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46 thf(lSue_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 0.21/0.46 lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46 thf(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI,type,
% 0.21/0.46 lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i ).
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46 thf(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI,type,
% 0.21/0.46 likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46 thf(n2009_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 0.21/0.46 n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46 %----The translated axioms
% 0.21/0.46 thf(ax,axiom,
% 0.21/0.46 likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ).
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46 thf(ax_001,axiom,
% 0.21/0.46 ! [Y: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ Y @ $true ) ).
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46 thf(ax_002,axiom,
% 0.21/0.46 ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
% 0.21/0.46 @ ! [X: $i] :
% 0.21/0.46 ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X )
% 0.21/0.46 => ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X ) ) ) ).
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46 %----The translated conjectures
% 0.21/0.46 thf(con,conjecture,
% 0.21/0.46 ? [X: $i,Y: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ Y ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X ) ) ).
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.46 ------------------------
% 1.50/1.38 ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.50/1.38 %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.50/1.38 %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 05:56:49 EST 2026
% 1.50/1.38 %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.50/1.38 %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.50/1.38 %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.50/1.38
% 1.50/1.38 % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xdsim8Bepg/DTF2DTF5774.p
% See solution above
% 1.50/1.38 ------------------------
% 1.50/1.39 ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.50/1.39 thf(numbers,type,
% 1.50/1.39 num: $tType ).
% 1.50/1.39
% 1.50/1.39 thf(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI,type,
% 1.50/1.39 holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o ).
% 1.50/1.39
% 1.50/1.39 thf(lBill_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 1.50/1.39 lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 1.50/1.39
% 1.50/1.39 thf(lMary_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 1.50/1.39 lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 1.50/1.39
% 1.50/1.39 thf(lSue_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 1.50/1.39 lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 1.50/1.39
% 1.50/1.39 thf(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI,type,
% 1.50/1.39 lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i ).
% 1.50/1.39
% 1.50/1.39 thf(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI,type,
% 1.50/1.39 likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).
% 1.50/1.39
% 1.50/1.39 thf(n2009_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 1.50/1.39 n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 1.50/1.39
% 1.50/1.39 thf(ax,axiom,
% 1.50/1.39 likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ).
% 1.50/1.39
% 1.50/1.39 thf(ax_001,axiom,
% 1.50/1.39 ! [Y: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ Y @ $true ) ).
% 1.50/1.39
% 1.50/1.39 thf(ax_002,axiom,
% 1.50/1.39 ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
% 1.50/1.39 @ ! [X: $i] :
% 1.50/1.39 ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X )
% 1.50/1.39 => ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X ) ) ) ).
% 1.50/1.39
% 1.50/1.39 thf(con,conjecture,
% 1.50/1.39 ? [X: $i,Y: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ Y ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X ) ) ).
% 1.50/1.39 ------------------------
% 1.71/1.41 % (5873)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_5774 for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 1.71/1.41 % (5876)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_5774 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.71/1.41 % (5872)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_5774 for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 1.71/1.41 % (5874)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_5774 for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 1.71/1.41 % (5877)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_5774 for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 1.71/1.41 % (5878)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_5774 for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 1.71/1.41 % (5875)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_5774 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.71/1.41 % (5877)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.71/1.41 % (5877)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.41 % (5877)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.71/1.41 % (5877)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.71/1.41
% 1.71/1.41 % (5875)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.71/1.41 % (5875)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.41 % (5875)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.71/1.41 % (5875)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.71/1.41 % (5875)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.71/1.41
% 1.71/1.41 % (5875)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.71/1.41 % (5875)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.71/1.41 % (5875)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.71/1.41 % (5875)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.41 % (5875)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.41
% 1.71/1.41 % (5877)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.71/1.41 % (5876)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.71/1.41 % (5876)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.41 % (5876)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.71/1.41 % (5876)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.71/1.41 % (5876)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.71/1.41
% 1.71/1.41 % (5876)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.71/1.41 % (5876)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.71/1.41 % (5876)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.71/1.41 % (5876)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.41 % (5876)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.41 % (5877)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.71/1.41 % (5877)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.71/1.41 % (5877)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.41 % (5877)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.41 % (5874)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.71/1.41 % (5874)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.41 % (5874)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.71/1.41 % (5874)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.71/1.41
% 1.71/1.41
% 1.71/1.41 % (5874)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.71/1.41 % (5874)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.71/1.41 % (5874)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.71/1.41 % (5874)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.41 % (5874)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.41 % (5873)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.71/1.41 % (5873)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.41 % (5873)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.71/1.41 % (5873)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.71/1.41
% 1.71/1.41
% 1.71/1.41 % (5873)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.71/1.41 % (5873)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.71/1.41 % (5873)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 1.71/1.41 % (5873)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.41 % (5873)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.41 % (5872)First to succeed.
% 1.71/1.41 % (5878)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.71/1.41 % (5872)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.71/1.41 % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_5774
% 1.71/1.41 % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_5774
% 1.71/1.41 thf(func_def_0, type, num: $tType).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(func_def_1, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(func_def_5, type, lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(func_def_6, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(func_def_16, type, ph1: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f79,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 $false),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f28,f48,f63,f69,f78])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f78,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 ~spl0_1),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f77])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f77,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 $false | ~spl0_1),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f24])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f24,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X0) != X1)) ) | ~spl0_1),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f23])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f23,definition,(
% 1.71/1.41 spl0_1 <=> ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : ((lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X0) != X1)),
% 1.71/1.41 introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f69,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 ~spl0_3),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f68])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f68,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 $false | ~spl0_3),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f64])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f64,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 ($true = $false) | ~spl0_3),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f44,f19])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f19,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f1,axiom,(
% 1.71/1.41 (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)),
% 1.71/1.41 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xdsim8Bepg/DTF2THF_5774.p',ax)).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f44,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 ( ! [X2 : $i] : (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X2) = $false)) ) | ~spl0_3),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f43])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f43,definition,(
% 1.71/1.41 spl0_3 <=> ! [X2 : $i] : ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X2) = $false)),
% 1.71/1.41 introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f63,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 ~spl0_4),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f62])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f62,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 $false | ~spl0_4),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f47])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f47,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 ( ! [X0 : $i] : ((n2009_THFTYPE_i != X0)) ) | ~spl0_4),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f46])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f46,definition,(
% 1.71/1.41 spl0_4 <=> ! [X0 : $i] : (n2009_THFTYPE_i != X0)),
% 1.71/1.41 introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_4])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f48,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 spl0_3 | spl0_4 | ~spl0_2),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f41,f26,f46,f43])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f26,definition,(
% 1.71/1.41 spl0_2 <=> ! [X2 : $i] : ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X2) != $true)),
% 1.71/1.41 introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f41,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 ( ! [X2 : $i,X0 : $i] : (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X2) = $false) | (n2009_THFTYPE_i != X0)) ) | ~spl0_2),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f40,f27])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f27,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 ( ! [X2 : $i] : (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X2) != $true)) ) | ~spl0_2),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f26])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f40,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 ( ! [X2 : $i,X0 : $i] : (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X2) = $false) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X2) = $true) | (n2009_THFTYPE_i != X0)) ) | ~spl0_2),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f39,f27])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f39,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 ( ! [X2 : $i,X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1) = $true) | (n2009_THFTYPE_i != X0) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X2) = $false) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X2) = $true)) )),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f38])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f38,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 ( ! [X2 : $i,X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : ((((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X2) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X2)) = $true) | (n2009_THFTYPE_i != X0) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1) = $true)) )),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f37])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f37,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 ( ! [X2 : $i,X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : ((n2009_THFTYPE_i != X0) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1) = $true) | (((^[Y0 : $i]: ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0))) @ X2) = $true)) )),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f31])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f31,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($true = (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0))))) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1) = $true) | (n2009_THFTYPE_i != X0)) )),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f30])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f30,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1) != (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0))))) | (n2009_THFTYPE_i != X0)) )),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f29])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f29,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($true != $true) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1) != (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0))))) | (n2009_THFTYPE_i != X0)) )),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f17,f16])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0))))) = $true)),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0))))) = $true)),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ! [X0 : $i] : ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0)))),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f3,axiom,(
% 1.71/1.41 (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ! [X1 : $i] : ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X1) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1)))),
% 1.71/1.41 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xdsim8Bepg/DTF2THF_5774.p',ax_002)).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f17,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X1) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0)) != $true)) )),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f15])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X1) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0)) != $true)),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 ~? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X1) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0)) = $true)),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 ~? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X1) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0))),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f5,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.71/1.41 ~? [X1 : $i,X0 : $i] : (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X0) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1))),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f4])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f4,conjecture,(
% 1.71/1.41 ? [X1 : $i,X0 : $i] : (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X0) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1))),
% 1.71/1.41 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xdsim8Bepg/DTF2THF_5774.p',con)).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f28,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 spl0_1 | spl0_2),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f21,f26,f23])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f21,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 ( ! [X2 : $i,X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X0) != X1) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X2) != $true)) )),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f20])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f20,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 ( ! [X2 : $i,X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X0) != X1) | ($true != $true) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X2) != $true)) )),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f17,f18])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f18,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X0 @ $true) = $true)) )),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f14])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 ! [X0 : $i] : ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X0 @ $true) = $true)),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f13])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.71/1.41 ! [X0 : $i] : (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X0 @ $true)),
% 1.71/1.41 inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.71/1.41 thf(f2,axiom,(
% 1.71/1.41 ! [X0 : $i] : (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X0 @ $true)),
% 1.71/1.41 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xdsim8Bepg/DTF2THF_5774.p',ax_001)).
% 1.71/1.41 % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_5774
% 1.71/1.41 % (5872)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.41 % (5872)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.71/1.41 % (5872)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.71/1.41
% 1.71/1.41 % (5872)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.71/1.41 % (5872)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 1.71/1.41 % (5872)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 1.71/1.41 % (5872)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.41 % (5872)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.41 % (5871)Success in time 0.018 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------