↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : CSR149^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 07:47:01 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 14.77s 4.92s
% Output   : Refutation 14.77s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (   8 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   80 (   9 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  174 (  37   ~;   9   |;   0   &; 123   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (   0   ^;  42   !;   6   ?;  48   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(num_type,type,
    num: $tType ).

thf(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI_decl,type,
    holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o ).

thf(lBill_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lMary_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lSue_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI_decl,type,
    lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i ).

thf(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI_decl,type,
    likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(n2009_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(42,axiom,
    likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_023) ).

thf(107,plain,
    likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[42]) ).

thf(35,axiom,
    ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
    @ ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ A )
       => ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_004) ).

thf(93,plain,
    ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
    @ ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ A )
       => ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[35]) ).

thf(32,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ $true ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_051) ).

thf(89,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ $true ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[32]) ).

thf(90,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ $true ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[89]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ? [A: $i,B: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ B ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [A: $i,B: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ B ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(44,plain,
    ~ ? [A: $i,B: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ B ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(45,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ B ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[44]) ).

thf(179,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ $true
      | ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ $true )
       != ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ C ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ B ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[90,45]) ).

thf(180,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ $true )
     != ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ C ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ B ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[179]) ).

thf(182,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A
       != ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ C ) )
      | ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ B ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[180]) ).

thf(187,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[182]) ).

thf(197,plain,
    ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
    @ ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ A )
       => $false ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[93,187]) ).

thf(198,plain,
    ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
    @ ! [A: $i] :
        ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ A ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[197]) ).

thf(41,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $o] :
      ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ ~ B )
     => ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_022) ).

thf(105,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $o] :
      ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ ~ B )
     => ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[41]) ).

thf(106,plain,
    ! [B: $o,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ ~ B )
      | ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ B ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[105]) ).

thf(171,plain,
    ! [C: $o,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ B @ ~ C )
      | ~ $true
      | ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ $true )
       != ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[90,106]) ).

thf(172,plain,
    ! [C: $o,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ B @ ~ C )
      | ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ $true )
       != ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[171]) ).

thf(173,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ ~ $true ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[172:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( A )),bind(C,$thf( $true ))]]) ).

thf(190,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ $false ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[173]) ).

thf(215,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ $true
      | ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
          @ ! [B: $i] :
              ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ B ) )
       != ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ $false ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[198,190]) ).

thf(216,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
        @ ! [B: $i] :
            ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ B ) )
     != ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ $false ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[215]) ).

thf(218,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
       != A )
      | ! [B: $i] :
          ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ B ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[216]) ).

thf(220,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
       != A )
      | ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ B ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[218]) ).

thf(221,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ A ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[220]) ).

thf(224,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[107,221]) ).

thf(225,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[224]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : CSR149^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.11/0.20  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.20  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.20  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.20  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.20  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.20  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.20  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.20  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 17:52:52 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.20  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.20  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.03/0.87  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 2.41/1.30  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (428ms). 
% 2.41/1.32  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 3.72/1.88  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 3.72/1.89  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 4.20/2.09  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 191 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 4.48/2.24  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 41 axioms (removed 150 axioms). 
% 4.48/2.29  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 4.82/2.30  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 4.82/2.31  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 14.77/4.91  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 14.77/4.92  % Time passed: 4566ms (effective reasoning time: 3580ms)
% 14.77/4.92  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 14.77/4.92  % Axioms used in derivation (4): ax_023, ax_004, ax_051, ax_022
% 14.77/4.92  % No. of inferences in proof: 31
% 14.77/4.92  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 4566 ms resp. 3580 ms w/o parsing
% 14.77/4.97  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 14.77/4.97  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------