%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : CSR149^3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 07:47:01 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 13.70s 4.27s
% Output : Refutation 13.70s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 18
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 28 ( 9 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 66 ( 8 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 143 ( 25 ~; 6 |; 0 &; 109 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 5 avg)
% Number of types : 3 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 10 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 39 ( 0 ^; 33 !; 6 ?; 39 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(num_type,type,
num: $tType ).
thf(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI_decl,type,
holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o ).
thf(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI_decl,type,
lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i ).
thf(lBill_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(lMary_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(lSue_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI_decl,type,
likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(n2009_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(11,axiom,
likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax) ).
thf(41,plain,
likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i,
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
thf(12,axiom,
( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
@ ! [A: $i] :
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ A )
=> ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_002) ).
thf(42,plain,
( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
@ ! [A: $i] :
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ A )
=> ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
thf(10,axiom,
! [A: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ $true ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_001) ).
thf(39,plain,
! [A: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ $true ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(40,plain,
! [A: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ $true ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[39]) ).
thf(1,conjecture,
? [A: $i,B: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ B ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [A: $i,B: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ B ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(13,plain,
~ ? [A: $i,B: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ B ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(14,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ B ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[13]) ).
thf(46,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ $true
| ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ $true )
!= ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ C ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ B ) ) ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[40,14]) ).
thf(47,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ $true )
!= ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ C ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ B ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[46]) ).
thf(50,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( A
!= ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ C ) )
| ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ B ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[47]) ).
thf(52,plain,
! [A: $i] :
~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[50]) ).
thf(53,plain,
( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
@ ! [A: $i] :
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ A )
=> $false ) ),
inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[42,52]) ).
thf(54,plain,
( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
@ ! [A: $i] :
~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ A ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[53]) ).
thf(55,plain,
! [A: $i] :
~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ A ) @ $false ),
inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[14,52]) ).
thf(59,plain,
! [A: $i] :
~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ A ) @ $false ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[55]) ).
thf(61,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ $true
| ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
@ ! [B: $i] :
~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ B ) )
!= ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ A ) @ $false ) ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[54,59]) ).
thf(62,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
@ ! [B: $i] :
~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ B ) )
!= ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ A ) @ $false ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[61]) ).
thf(65,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
!= ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ A ) )
| ! [B: $i] :
~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ B ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[62]) ).
thf(67,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
!= ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ A ) )
| ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ B ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[65]) ).
thf(1166,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( n2009_THFTYPE_i != A )
| ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ B ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[67]) ).
thf(1219,plain,
! [A: $i] :
~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ A ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[1166:[bind(A,$thf( n2009_THFTYPE_i ))]]) ).
thf(1222,plain,
! [A: $i] :
~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ A ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[1219]) ).
thf(1246,plain,
$false,
inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[41,1222]) ).
thf(1247,plain,
$false,
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[1246]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR149^3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.3.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.12/0.19 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.19 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.19 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.19 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.19 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.19 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.19 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.19 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 17:57:30 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.19 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.19 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.89/0.79 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 3.68/1.57 % [INFO] Parsing done (778ms).
% 3.68/1.59 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 4.82/1.98 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 4.82/1.98 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 6.02/2.32 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 3580 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 6.23/2.42 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 10 axioms (removed 3570 axioms).
% 6.23/2.45 % [INFO] Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF).
% 6.23/2.45 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 6.23/2.46 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 13.70/4.27 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 13.70/4.27 % Time passed: 3926ms (effective reasoning time: 2672ms)
% 13.70/4.27 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 13.70/4.27 % Axioms used in derivation (3): ax, ax_002, ax_001
% 13.70/4.27 % No. of inferences in proof: 28
% 13.70/4.27 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 3926 ms resp. 2672 ms w/o parsing
% 13.70/4.29 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 13.70/4.29 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------