%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : CSR149^3 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.UvivdARbWr true
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 04:32:29 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Theorem 0.60s 0.91s
% Output : Refutation 0.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.14 % Problem : CSR149^3 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v5.3.0.
% 0.09/0.15 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.UvivdARbWr true
% 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 15:05:53 EDT 2025
% 0.15/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.38 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.15/0.38 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.38 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.15/0.38 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.15/0.38 % Running in HO mode
% 0.55/0.67 % Total configuration time : 828
% 0.55/0.67 % Estimated wc time : 1656
% 0.55/0.67 % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0
% 0.58/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s
% 0.58/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 80s
% 0.58/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 90s
% 0.58/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 30s
% 0.58/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 80s
% 0.58/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 70s
% 0.58/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 40s
% 0.60/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/30_sp5.sh running for 60s
% 0.60/0.91 % Solved by lams/40_c.s.sh.
% 0.60/0.91 % done 16 iterations in 0.128s
% 0.60/0.91 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.60/0.91 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.60/0.91 thf(lSue_THFTYPE_i_type, type, lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i).
% 0.60/0.91 thf(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI_type, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI:
% 0.60/0.91 $i > $o > $o).
% 0.60/0.91 thf(lMary_THFTYPE_i_type, type, lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i).
% 0.60/0.91 thf(n2009_THFTYPE_i_type, type, n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i).
% 0.60/0.91 thf(lBill_THFTYPE_i_type, type, lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i).
% 0.60/0.91 thf(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI_type, type, lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i).
% 0.60/0.91 thf(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI_type, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.60/0.91 thf(ax, axiom, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)).
% 0.60/0.91 thf(zip_derived_cl134, plain,
% 0.60/0.91 ( (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)),
% 0.60/0.91 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax])).
% 0.60/0.91 thf(ax_002, axiom,
% 0.60/0.91 (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @
% 0.60/0.91 ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @
% 0.60/0.91 ( ![X:$i]:
% 0.60/0.91 ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X ) =>
% 0.60/0.91 ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X ) ) ))).
% 0.60/0.91 thf(zip_derived_cl136, plain,
% 0.60/0.91 ( (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @
% 0.60/0.91 (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @
% 0.60/0.91 (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.91 (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) =>
% 0.60/0.91 (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0)))))))),
% 0.60/0.91 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax_002])).
% 0.60/0.91 thf(zip_derived_cl144, plain,
% 0.60/0.91 (![X-81 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.91 ( ((^[Y0 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.91 (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) =>
% 0.60/0.91 (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0)))) @
% 0.60/0.91 X-81)
% 0.60/0.91 | (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @
% 0.60/0.91 (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ($false)))),
% 0.60/0.91 inference('forall_hoist', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl136])).
% 0.60/0.91 thf(zip_derived_cl149, plain,
% 0.60/0.91 (![X-81 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.91 ( (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X-81) =>
% 0.60/0.91 (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X-81)))
% 0.60/0.91 | (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @
% 0.60/0.91 (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ($false)))),
% 0.60/0.91 inference('ho_norm', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl144])).
% 0.60/0.91 thf(zip_derived_cl150, plain,
% 0.60/0.91 (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.91 ( (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X0) =>
% 0.60/0.91 (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0)))
% 0.60/0.91 | (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @
% 0.60/0.91 (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ($false)))),
% 0.60/0.91 inference('cannonize vars', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl149])).
% 0.60/0.91 thf(zip_derived_cl152, plain,
% 0.60/0.91 (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.91 ( (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @
% 0.60/0.91 (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ($false))
% 0.60/0.91 | (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0)
% 0.60/0.91 | ~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X0))),
% 0.60/0.91 inference('cnf_otf', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl150])).
% 0.60/0.91 thf(con, conjecture,
% 0.60/0.91 (?[X:$i,Y:$i]:
% 0.60/0.91 ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @
% 0.60/0.91 ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ Y ) @
% 0.60/0.91 ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X ) ))).
% 0.60/0.91 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.60/0.91 (~( ?[X:$i,Y:$i]:
% 0.60/0.91 ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @
% 0.60/0.91 ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ Y ) @
% 0.60/0.91 ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X ) ) )),
% 0.60/0.91 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [con])).
% 0.60/0.91 thf(zip_derived_cl137, plain,
% 0.60/0.91 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.91 ~ (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X0) @
% 0.60/0.91 (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1))),
% 0.60/0.91 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.60/0.91 thf(zip_derived_cl138, plain,
% 0.60/0.91 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.91 ( (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1)
% 0.60/0.91 | ~ (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X0) @
% 0.60/0.91 ($false)))),
% 0.60/0.91 inference('bool_hoist', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl137])).
% 0.60/0.91 thf(zip_derived_cl158, plain,
% 0.60/0.91 (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.91 (~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X0)
% 0.60/0.91 | (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0))),
% 0.60/0.91 inference('clc', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl152, zip_derived_cl138])).
% 0.60/0.91 thf(zip_derived_cl139, plain,
% 0.60/0.91 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.91 (~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1)
% 0.60/0.91 | ~ (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X0) @
% 0.60/0.91 ($true)))),
% 0.60/0.91 inference('bool_hoist', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl137])).
% 0.60/0.91 thf(ax_001, axiom, (![Y:$i]: ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ Y @ $true ))).
% 0.60/0.91 thf(zip_derived_cl135, plain,
% 0.60/0.91 (![X0 : $i]: (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X0 @ ($true))),
% 0.60/0.91 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax_001])).
% 0.60/0.91 thf(zip_derived_cl140, plain,
% 0.60/0.91 (![X1 : $i]: ~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1)),
% 0.60/0.91 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl139, zip_derived_cl135])).
% 0.60/0.91 thf(zip_derived_cl162, plain,
% 0.60/0.91 (![X0 : $i]: ~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X0)),
% 0.60/0.91 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl158, zip_derived_cl140])).
% 0.60/0.91 thf(zip_derived_cl164, plain, ($false),
% 0.60/0.91 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl134, zip_derived_cl162])).
% 0.60/0.91
% 0.60/0.91 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.60/0.91
% 0.60/0.91
% 0.60/0.91 % Terminating...
% 0.63/0.99 % Runner terminated.
% 0.63/1.01 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------