↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : CSR152^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 07:46:55 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 4.16s 4.38s
% Output   : Proof 4.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : CSR152^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.15  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime   : Thu Oct  2 19:45:53 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.37  % CPUTime    : 
% 4.16/4.38  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.16/4.38  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 4.16/4.38  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI lChris_THFTYPE_i (Eq lChris_THFTYPE_i lChris_THFTYPE_i)) True
% 4.16/4.38  Clause #1 (by assumption #[]): Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lMary_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) True
% 4.16/4.38  Clause #2 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 4.16/4.38    (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI lChris_THFTYPE_i
% 4.16/4.38      (∀ (X : Iota), likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lMary_THFTYPE_i X → likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i X))
% 4.16/4.38    True
% 4.16/4.38  Clause #3 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI lChris_THFTYPE_i (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i))) True
% 4.16/4.38  Clause #4 (by bool simp #[0]): Eq (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI lChris_THFTYPE_i True) True
% 4.16/4.38  Clause #5 (by clausification #[3]): Eq (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI lChris_THFTYPE_i (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i)) False
% 4.16/4.38  Clause #6 (by identity loobHoist #[5]): Or (Eq (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI lChris_THFTYPE_i True) False)
% 4.16/4.38    (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) False)
% 4.16/4.38  Clause #7 (by identity boolHoist #[5]): Or (Eq (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI lChris_THFTYPE_i False) False)
% 4.16/4.38    (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) True)
% 4.16/4.38  Clause #8 (by superposition #[6, 4]): Or (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) False) (Eq False True)
% 4.16/4.38  Clause #9 (by clausification #[8]): Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) False
% 4.16/4.38  Clause #12 (by identity boolHoist #[2]): Or (Eq (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI lChris_THFTYPE_i False) True)
% 4.16/4.38    (Eq (∀ (X : Iota), likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lMary_THFTYPE_i X → likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i X) True)
% 4.16/4.38  Clause #18 (by forward demodulation #[7, 9]): Or (Eq (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI lChris_THFTYPE_i False) False) (Eq False True)
% 4.16/4.38  Clause #19 (by clausification #[18]): Eq (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI lChris_THFTYPE_i False) False
% 4.16/4.38  Clause #20 (by clausification #[12]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 4.16/4.38    Or (Eq (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI lChris_THFTYPE_i False) True)
% 4.16/4.38      (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lMary_THFTYPE_i a → likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i a) True)
% 4.16/4.38  Clause #21 (by clausification #[20]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 4.16/4.38    Or (Eq (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI lChris_THFTYPE_i False) True)
% 4.16/4.38      (Or (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lMary_THFTYPE_i a) False) (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i a) True))
% 4.16/4.38  Clause #22 (by superposition #[21, 1]): Or (Eq (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI lChris_THFTYPE_i False) True)
% 4.16/4.38    (Or (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) True) (Eq False True))
% 4.16/4.38  Clause #23 (by clausification #[22]): Or (Eq (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI lChris_THFTYPE_i False) True) (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) True)
% 4.16/4.38  Clause #24 (by forward demodulation #[23, 9]): Or (Eq (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI lChris_THFTYPE_i False) True) (Eq False True)
% 4.16/4.38  Clause #25 (by clausification #[24]): Eq (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI lChris_THFTYPE_i False) True
% 4.16/4.38  Clause #26 (by superposition #[25, 19]): Eq True False
% 4.16/4.38  Clause #27 (by clausification #[26]): False
% 4.16/4.38  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------