%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : CSR152_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:03:27 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 3.49s 2.43s
% Output : Refutation 3.49s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 17
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 8 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 67 ( 10 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 126 ( 19 ~; 10 |; 0 &; 92 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Number of types : 3 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 9 ( 6 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 0 ^; 9 !; 0 ?; 9 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(num_type,type,
num: $tType ).
thf(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI_decl,type,
knows_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o ).
thf(lBill_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(lChris_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
lChris_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(lMary_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(lSue_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI_decl,type,
likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(4,axiom,
lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_001) ).
thf(8,plain,
lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(5,axiom,
( ! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
=> ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
@ ( lChris_THFTYPE_i @ knows_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_002) ).
thf(9,plain,
( ! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
=> ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
@ ( lChris_THFTYPE_i @ knows_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(1,conjecture,
lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) @ ( lChris_THFTYPE_i @ knows_THFTYPE_IiooI ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) @ ( lChris_THFTYPE_i @ knows_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(6,plain,
~ ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) @ ( lChris_THFTYPE_i @ knows_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(3,axiom,
( lChris_THFTYPE_i = lChris_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( lChris_THFTYPE_i @ knows_THFTYPE_IiooI ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax) ).
thf(7,plain,
$true @ ( lChris_THFTYPE_i @ knows_THFTYPE_IiooI ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(10,plain,
( ( ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) @ ( lChris_THFTYPE_i @ knows_THFTYPE_IiooI ) )
!= ( $true @ ( lChris_THFTYPE_i @ knows_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ) )
| ~ $true ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[7,6]) ).
thf(11,plain,
( ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) @ ( lChris_THFTYPE_i @ knows_THFTYPE_IiooI ) )
!= ( $true @ ( lChris_THFTYPE_i @ knows_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(13,plain,
( ~ ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
| ( lChris_THFTYPE_i != lChris_THFTYPE_i ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
thf(15,plain,
~ ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
thf(17,plain,
~ ( $false @ ( lChris_THFTYPE_i @ knows_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ),
inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[6,15]) ).
thf(26,plain,
( ( ( ! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
=> ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
@ ( lChris_THFTYPE_i @ knows_THFTYPE_IiooI ) )
!= ( $false @ ( lChris_THFTYPE_i @ knows_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ) )
| ~ $true ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[9,17]) ).
thf(27,plain,
( ( ! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
=> ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
@ ( lChris_THFTYPE_i @ knows_THFTYPE_IiooI ) )
!= ( $false @ ( lChris_THFTYPE_i @ knows_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[26]) ).
thf(28,plain,
( ! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
=> ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
| ( lChris_THFTYPE_i != lChris_THFTYPE_i ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[27]) ).
thf(29,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
| ~ ( A @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
| ( lChris_THFTYPE_i != lChris_THFTYPE_i ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[28]) ).
thf(30,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
| ~ ( A @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[29]) ).
thf(33,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
!= ( A @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
| ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
| ~ $true ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[8,30]) ).
thf(34,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
!= ( A @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
| ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[33]) ).
thf(35,plain,
lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[34:[bind(A,$thf( lBill_THFTYPE_i ))]]) ).
thf(43,plain,
$false,
inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[35,15]) ).
thf(44,plain,
$false,
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[43]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR152_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.16/0.41 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.41 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.41 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.41 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.41 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.41 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.41 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.41 % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 01:15:34 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.42 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.42 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.87/0.99 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.29/1.17 % [INFO] Parsing done (175ms).
% 1.29/1.18 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 1.80/1.59 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 1.98/1.60 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 1.98/1.70 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 3 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 2.13/1.73 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 3 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 2.13/1.74 % [INFO] Problem is typed first-order (TPTP TFF).
% 2.13/1.75 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 2.13/1.76 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 3.49/2.42 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 3.49/2.43 % Time passed: 1865ms (effective reasoning time: 1235ms)
% 3.49/2.43 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.49/2.43 % Axioms used in derivation (3): ax_001, ax_002, ax
% 3.49/2.43 % No. of inferences in proof: 24
% 3.49/2.43 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1865 ms resp. 1235 ms w/o parsing
% 3.49/2.47 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.49/2.47 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------