↑ Up

E---3.5.1.SAT-Sat.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : CSR154+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:17:41 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.22s 0.58s
% Output   : Saturation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_19ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_31ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ antitrajectory(X3,X2,X5,X4)
    | ~ less(n0,X4)
    | ~ terminates(X1,X3,X2)
    | ~ happens(X1,X2)
    | holdsAt(X5,plus(X2,X4))
    | startedIn(X2,X3,plus(X2,X4)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ trajectory(X3,X2,X5,X4)
    | ~ less(n0,X4)
    | ~ initiates(X1,X3,X2)
    | ~ happens(X1,X2)
    | holdsAt(X5,plus(X2,X4))
    | stoppedIn(X2,X3,plus(X2,X4)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ releasedAt(X1,X2)
    | releasedAt(X1,plus(X2,n1))
    | terminates(esk7_2(X1,X2),X1,X2)
    | initiates(esk7_2(X1,X2),X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ holdsAt(X1,X2)
    | holdsAt(X1,plus(X2,n1))
    | releasedAt(X1,plus(X2,n1))
    | terminates(esk5_2(X1,X2),X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ holdsAt(X1,plus(X2,n1))
    | releasedAt(X1,plus(X2,n1))
    | holdsAt(X1,X2)
    | initiates(esk6_2(X1,X2),X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ holdsAt(X1,X2)
    | holdsAt(X1,plus(X2,n1))
    | releasedAt(X1,plus(X2,n1))
    | happens(esk5_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ holdsAt(X1,plus(X2,n1))
    | releasedAt(X1,plus(X2,n1))
    | holdsAt(X1,X2)
    | happens(esk6_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( ~ startedIn(X1,X3,X2)
    | initiates(esk3_3(X1,X2,X3),X3,esk4_3(X1,X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( ~ initiates(X1,X5,X2)
    | ~ less(X2,X4)
    | ~ less(X3,X2)
    | ~ happens(X1,X2)
    | startedIn(X3,X5,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( ~ terminates(X1,X5,X2)
    | ~ less(X2,X4)
    | ~ less(X3,X2)
    | ~ happens(X1,X2)
    | stoppedIn(X3,X5,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( ~ stoppedIn(X1,X2,X3)
    | terminates(esk1_3(X1,X2,X3),X2,esk2_3(X1,X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    ( ~ startedIn(X1,X3,X2)
    | happens(esk3_3(X1,X2,X3),esk4_3(X1,X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( ~ stoppedIn(X1,X2,X3)
    | happens(esk1_3(X1,X2,X3),esk2_3(X1,X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    ( ~ releasedAt(X1,plus(X2,n1))
    | releasedAt(X1,X2)
    | releases(esk8_2(X1,X2),X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    ( ~ releasedAt(X1,X2)
    | releasedAt(X1,plus(X2,n1))
    | happens(esk7_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    ( ~ releasedAt(X1,plus(X2,n1))
    | releasedAt(X1,X2)
    | happens(esk8_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    ( ~ startedIn(X1,X3,X2)
    | less(esk4_3(X1,X2,X3),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    ( ~ stoppedIn(X1,X2,X3)
    | less(esk2_3(X1,X2,X3),X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    ( ~ releases(X1,X3,X2)
    | ~ happens(X1,X2)
    | releasedAt(X3,plus(X2,n1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    ( ~ initiates(X1,X3,X2)
    | ~ happens(X1,X2)
    | holdsAt(X3,plus(X2,n1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    ( ~ holdsAt(X3,plus(X2,n1))
    | ~ terminates(X1,X3,X2)
    | ~ happens(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    ( ~ startedIn(X1,X3,X2)
    | less(X1,esk4_3(X1,X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    ( ~ stoppedIn(X1,X2,X3)
    | less(X1,esk2_3(X1,X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    ( ~ releasedAt(X2,plus(X3,n1))
    | ~ happens(X1,X3)
    | ~ initiates(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    ( ~ releasedAt(X2,plus(X3,n1))
    | ~ happens(X1,X3)
    | ~ terminates(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]),
    [final] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : CSR154+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v6.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.39  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.39  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:16:03 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.40  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.40  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.58  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.22/0.58  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.58  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.58  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.58  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.58  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.58  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.58  % new_bool_3 with pid 3582125 completed with status 9
% 0.22/0.58  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3582124 completed with status 1
% 0.22/0.58  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.22/0.58  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.58  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.58  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.58  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.22/0.58  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.58  % Search class: FGHNF-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.58  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.58  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.58  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.58  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S032N with 267s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.58  % Starting new_bool_3 with 267s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.58  % Starting new_bool_1 with 267s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.58  % new_bool_1 with pid 3582163 completed with status 1
% 0.22/0.58  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.22/0.58  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.58  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.58  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.58  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.22/0.58  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.58  % Search class: FGHNF-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.58  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.58  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.58  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.58  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S032N with 267s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.58  % Starting new_bool_3 with 267s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.58  % Starting new_bool_1 with 267s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.58  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.58  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.58  
% 0.22/0.58  % No proof found!
% 0.22/0.58  % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.22/0.58  % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.58  % Parsed axioms                        : 12
% 0.22/0.58  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.22/0.58  % Initial clauses                      : 25
% 0.22/0.58  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.22/0.58  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 25
% 0.22/0.58  % Processed clauses                    : 50
% 0.22/0.58  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.22/0.58  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.22/0.58  % ...remaining for further processing  : 50
% 0.22/0.58  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.22/0.58  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/0.58  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.22/0.58  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.22/0.58  % Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.22/0.58  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.22/0.58  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.22/0.58  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.22/0.58  % Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.22/0.58  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.22/0.58  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.22/0.58  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.22/0.58  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.22/0.58  % Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.22/0.58  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.22/0.58  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.22/0.58  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.22/0.58  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.58  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.22/0.58  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.58  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.22/0.58  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.22/0.58  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.22/0.58  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.22/0.58  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.22/0.58  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.22/0.58  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.22/0.58  % Current number of processed clauses  : 25
% 0.22/0.58  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 0
% 0.22/0.58  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.58  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.22/0.58  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 25
% 0.22/0.58  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.58  % ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.22/0.58  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/0.58  % Current number of archived clauses   : 25
% 0.22/0.58  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 99
% 0.22/0.58  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 41
% 0.22/0.58  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.22/0.58  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/0.58  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/0.58  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.22/0.58  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.22/0.58  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/0.58  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/0.58  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 2972
% 0.22/0.58  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 553
% 0.22/0.58  
% 0.22/0.58  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.58  % User time                : 0.015 s
% 0.22/0.58  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.58  % Total time               : 0.019 s
% 0.22/0.58  % Maximum resident set size: 3656 pages
% 0.22/0.58  
% 0.22/0.58  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.58  % User time                : 0.065 s
% 0.22/0.58  % System time              : 0.042 s
% 0.22/0.58  % Total time               : 0.108 s
% 0.22/0.58  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.22/0.58  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------