%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR176+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:54 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 80.16s 13.22s
% Output : CNFRefutation 80.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 17
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 55 ( 28 unt; 0 nHn; 55 RR)
% Number of literals : 89 ( 0 equ; 40 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-7 aty)
% Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 14 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 62 ( 10 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_3153,plain,
( p__d__disjointDecomposition7(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7)
| ~ p__d__partition7(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-24hk05dg/input.p',i_0_3153) ).
cnf(i_0_780,plain,
p__d__partition7(c__Communication,c__Stating,c__Supposing,c__Directing,c__Committing,c__Expressing,c__Declaring),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-24hk05dg/input.p',i_0_780) ).
cnf(i_0_3238,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-24hk05dg/input.p',i_0_3238) ).
cnf(i_0_860,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__ContentBearingProcess,c__ContentBearingPhysical),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-24hk05dg/input.p',i_0_860) ).
cnf(i_0_3199,plain,
( p__d__disjoint(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__disjointDecomposition7(X3,X4,X5,X6,X1,X7,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-24hk05dg/input.p',i_0_3199) ).
cnf(i_0_3148,plain,
( p__d__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-24hk05dg/input.p',i_0_3148) ).
cnf(i_0_3146,negated_conjecture,
p__d__subclass(esk626_0,c__Committing),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-24hk05dg/input.p',i_0_3146) ).
cnf(i_0_832,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__ContentBearingPhysical,c__Physical),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-24hk05dg/input.p',i_0_832) ).
cnf(i_0_779,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Communication,c__ContentBearingProcess),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-24hk05dg/input.p',i_0_779) ).
cnf(i_0_3151,plain,
( ~ p__d__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ p__d__disjoint(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-24hk05dg/input.p',i_0_3151) ).
cnf(i_0_185,plain,
( p__d__instance(esk28_1(X1),X1)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Entity) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-24hk05dg/input.p',i_0_185) ).
cnf(i_0_190,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Entity)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Class) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-24hk05dg/input.p',i_0_190) ).
cnf(i_0_189,plain,
( p__d__instance(X1,c__Class)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Entity) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-24hk05dg/input.p',i_0_189) ).
cnf(i_0_193,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Physical,c__Entity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-24hk05dg/input.p',i_0_193) ).
cnf(i_0_3147,negated_conjecture,
p__d__subclass(esk626_0,c__Declaring),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-24hk05dg/input.p',i_0_3147) ).
cnf(i_0_838,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Declaring,c__LinguisticCommunication),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-24hk05dg/input.p',i_0_838) ).
cnf(i_0_802,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__LinguisticCommunication,c__Communication),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-24hk05dg/input.p',i_0_802) ).
cnf(c_0_3256,plain,
( p__d__disjointDecomposition7(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7)
| ~ p__d__partition7(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7) ),
i_0_3153 ).
cnf(c_0_3257,plain,
p__d__partition7(c__Communication,c__Stating,c__Supposing,c__Directing,c__Committing,c__Expressing,c__Declaring),
i_0_780 ).
cnf(c_0_3258,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,X3) ),
i_0_3238 ).
cnf(c_0_3259,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__ContentBearingProcess,c__ContentBearingPhysical),
i_0_860 ).
cnf(c_0_3260,plain,
( p__d__disjoint(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__disjointDecomposition7(X3,X4,X5,X6,X1,X7,X2) ),
i_0_3199 ).
cnf(c_0_3261,plain,
p__d__disjointDecomposition7(c__Communication,c__Stating,c__Supposing,c__Directing,c__Committing,c__Expressing,c__Declaring),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3256,c_0_3257]) ).
cnf(c_0_3262,plain,
( p__d__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X3,X2) ),
i_0_3148 ).
cnf(c_0_3263,negated_conjecture,
p__d__subclass(esk626_0,c__Committing),
i_0_3146 ).
cnf(c_0_3264,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__ContentBearingPhysical,c__Physical),
i_0_832 ).
cnf(c_0_3265,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__ContentBearingPhysical)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__ContentBearingProcess) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3258,c_0_3259]) ).
cnf(c_0_3266,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Communication,c__ContentBearingProcess),
i_0_779 ).
cnf(c_0_3267,plain,
( ~ p__d__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ p__d__disjoint(X3,X2) ),
i_0_3151 ).
cnf(c_0_3268,plain,
p__d__disjoint(c__Committing,c__Declaring),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3260,c_0_3261]) ).
cnf(c_0_3269,negated_conjecture,
( p__d__instance(X1,c__Committing)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,esk626_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3262,c_0_3263]) ).
cnf(c_0_3270,plain,
( p__d__instance(esk28_1(X1),X1)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Entity) ),
i_0_185 ).
cnf(c_0_3271,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Entity)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Class) ),
i_0_190 ).
cnf(c_0_3272,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Physical)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__ContentBearingPhysical) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3258,c_0_3264]) ).
cnf(c_0_3273,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Communication,c__ContentBearingPhysical),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3265,c_0_3266]) ).
cnf(c_0_3274,plain,
( p__d__instance(X1,c__Class)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Entity) ),
i_0_189 ).
cnf(c_0_3275,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Physical,c__Entity),
i_0_193 ).
cnf(c_0_3276,negated_conjecture,
p__d__subclass(esk626_0,c__Declaring),
i_0_3147 ).
cnf(c_0_3277,plain,
( ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Committing)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Declaring) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3267,c_0_3268]) ).
cnf(c_0_3278,plain,
( p__d__instance(esk28_1(esk626_0),c__Committing)
| ~ p__d__subclass(esk626_0,c__Entity) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3269,c_0_3270]) ).
cnf(c_0_3279,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Entity)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__instance(X2,c__Class) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3258,c_0_3271]) ).
cnf(c_0_3280,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Communication,c__Physical),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3272,c_0_3273]) ).
cnf(c_0_3281,plain,
p__d__instance(c__Physical,c__Class),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3274,c_0_3275]) ).
cnf(c_0_3282,negated_conjecture,
( p__d__instance(X1,c__Declaring)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,esk626_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3262,c_0_3276]) ).
cnf(c_0_3283,plain,
( ~ p__d__subclass(esk626_0,c__Entity)
| ~ p__d__instance(esk28_1(esk626_0),c__Declaring) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3277,c_0_3278]) ).
cnf(c_0_3284,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Communication,c__Entity),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3279,c_0_3280]),c_0_3281])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3285,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Declaring,c__LinguisticCommunication),
i_0_838 ).
cnf(c_0_3286,plain,
~ p__d__subclass(esk626_0,c__Entity),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3282,c_0_3270]),c_0_3283]) ).
cnf(c_0_3287,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Entity)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Communication) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3258,c_0_3284]) ).
cnf(c_0_3288,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__LinguisticCommunication,c__Communication),
i_0_802 ).
cnf(c_0_3289,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__LinguisticCommunication)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Declaring) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3258,c_0_3285]) ).
cnf(c_0_3290,plain,
~ p__d__subclass(esk626_0,c__Communication),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3286,c_0_3287]) ).
cnf(c_0_3291,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Communication)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__LinguisticCommunication) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3258,c_0_3288]) ).
cnf(c_0_3292,negated_conjecture,
p__d__subclass(esk626_0,c__LinguisticCommunication),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3289,c_0_3276]) ).
cnf(c_0_3293,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3290,c_0_3291]),c_0_3292])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : CSR176+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.36 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.36 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 06:19:11 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.41/0.61 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.41/0.61 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.41/0.61 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.41/0.61 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 80.16/13.22 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 80.16/13.22 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 80.16/13.22 # Preprocessing time : 0.162 s
% 80.16/13.22
% 80.16/13.22 # Proof found!
% 80.16/13.22 # SZS status Theorem
% 80.16/13.22 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 80.16/13.22 # Proof object total steps : 55
% 80.16/13.22 # Proof object clause steps : 38
% 80.16/13.22 # Proof object formula steps : 17
% 80.16/13.22 # Proof object conjectures : 7
% 80.16/13.22 # Proof object clause conjectures : 5
% 80.16/13.22 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 80.16/13.22 # Proof object initial clauses used : 17
% 80.16/13.22 # Proof object initial formulas used : 17
% 80.16/13.22 # Proof object generating inferences : 21
% 80.16/13.22 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 5
% 80.16/13.22 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 80.16/13.22 # Parsed axioms : 4203
% 80.16/13.22 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 80.16/13.22 # Initial clauses : 4203
% 80.16/13.22 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 80.16/13.22 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4203
% 80.16/13.22 # Processed clauses : 12709
% 80.16/13.22 # ...of these trivial : 166
% 80.16/13.22 # ...subsumed : 1115
% 80.16/13.22 # ...remaining for further processing : 11428
% 80.16/13.22 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 9
% 80.16/13.22 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 80.16/13.22 # Backward-subsumed : 97
% 80.16/13.22 # Backward-rewritten : 16
% 80.16/13.22 # Generated clauses : 61802
% 80.16/13.22 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 60029
% 80.16/13.22 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2710
% 80.16/13.22 # Paramodulations : 61755
% 80.16/13.22 # Factorizations : 0
% 80.16/13.22 # Equation resolutions : 47
% 80.16/13.22 # Propositional unsat checks : 2
% 80.16/13.22 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 80.16/13.22 # Current number of processed clauses : 11311
% 80.16/13.22 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2530
% 80.16/13.22 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 80.16/13.22 # Negative unit clauses : 1581
% 80.16/13.22 # Non-unit-clauses : 7200
% 80.16/13.22 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 51341
% 80.16/13.22 # ...number of literals in the above : 169653
% 80.16/13.22 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 80.16/13.22 # Current number of archived clauses : 113
% 80.16/13.22 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 16232737
% 80.16/13.22 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6048694
% 80.16/13.22 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3616
% 80.16/13.22 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3855813
% 80.16/13.22 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 80.16/13.22 # BW rewrite match attempts : 127
% 80.16/13.22 # BW rewrite match successes : 11
% 80.16/13.22 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 80.16/13.22 # Condensation successes : 0
% 80.16/13.22 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1057186
% 80.16/13.22
% 80.16/13.22 # -------------------------------------------------
% 80.16/13.22 # User time : 8.652 s
% 80.16/13.22 # System time : 0.091 s
% 80.16/13.22 # Total time : 8.743 s
% 80.16/13.22 # ...preprocessing : 0.162 s
% 80.16/13.22 # ...main loop : 8.582 s
% 80.16/13.22 # Maximum resident set size: 109792 pages
% 80.16/13.22
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------