↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : CSR232+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:16:11 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 12.96s 8.13s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 12.96s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  17 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   42 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   28 (  14   ~;  10   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   7 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (   0 sgn   7   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(predefinitionsA8,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( p__d__subclass(X1,X2)
        & p__d__subclass(X2,X3) )
     => p__d__subclass(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',predefinitionsA8) ).

fof(mergeA2697,axiom,
    p__d__subclass(c__SocialInteraction,c__IntentionalProcess),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA2697) ).

fof(mergeA2701,axiom,
    p__d__subclass(c__Communication,c__SocialInteraction),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA2701) ).

fof(mergeA2713,axiom,
    p__d__subclass(c__Gesture,c__Communication),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA2713) ).

fof(commonSubclassEvent1126,conjecture,
    ? [X1] :
      ( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Impacting)
      & p__d__subclass(X1,c__IntentionalProcess) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commonSubclassEvent1126) ).

fof(miloA1799,axiom,
    p__d__subclass(c__HandGesture,c__Gesture),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',miloA1799) ).

fof(miloA1805,axiom,
    p__d__subclass(c__Clapping,c__Impacting),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',miloA1805) ).

fof(miloA1803,axiom,
    p__d__subclass(c__Clapping,c__HandGesture),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',miloA1803) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X7771,X7772,X7773] :
      ( ~ p__d__subclass(X7771,X7772)
      | ~ p__d__subclass(X7772,X7773)
      | p__d__subclass(X7771,X7773) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[predefinitionsA8])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( p__d__subclass(X1,X3)
    | ~ p__d__subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ p__d__subclass(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    p__d__subclass(c__SocialInteraction,c__IntentionalProcess),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA2697]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( p__d__subclass(X1,c__IntentionalProcess)
    | ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__SocialInteraction) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    p__d__subclass(c__Communication,c__SocialInteraction),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA2701]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    p__d__subclass(c__Communication,c__IntentionalProcess),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( p__d__subclass(X1,c__IntentionalProcess)
    | ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Communication) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    p__d__subclass(c__Gesture,c__Communication),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA2713]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    p__d__subclass(c__Gesture,c__IntentionalProcess),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X1] :
        ( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Impacting)
        & p__d__subclass(X1,c__IntentionalProcess) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[commonSubclassEvent1126]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( p__d__subclass(X1,c__IntentionalProcess)
    | ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Gesture) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    p__d__subclass(c__HandGesture,c__Gesture),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[miloA1799]) ).

fof(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X14607] :
      ( ~ p__d__subclass(X14607,c__Impacting)
      | ~ p__d__subclass(X14607,c__IntentionalProcess) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    p__d__subclass(c__HandGesture,c__IntentionalProcess),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Impacting)
    | ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__IntentionalProcess) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    p__d__subclass(c__Clapping,c__Impacting),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[miloA1805]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( p__d__subclass(X1,c__IntentionalProcess)
    | ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__HandGesture) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    p__d__subclass(c__Clapping,c__HandGesture),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[miloA1803]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p__d__subclass(c__Clapping,c__IntentionalProcess),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : CSR232+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 17:14:17 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 12.96/8.13  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 12.96/8.13  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 12.96/8.13  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 12.96/8.13  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 12.96/8.14  % Total time : 7.243s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------