%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR232+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:17:47 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 2.86s 1.17s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.86s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 28 ( 17 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 42 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 27 ( 13 ~; 10 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 7 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 17 ( 0 sgn 7 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(predefinitionsA8,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( p__d__subclass(X2,X3)
& p__d__subclass(X1,X2) )
=> p__d__subclass(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',predefinitionsA8) ).
fof(mergeA2697,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__SocialInteraction,c__IntentionalProcess),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA2697) ).
fof(mergeA2701,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Communication,c__SocialInteraction),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA2701) ).
fof(mergeA2713,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Gesture,c__Communication),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA2713) ).
fof(miloA1799,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__HandGesture,c__Gesture),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',miloA1799) ).
fof(commonSubclassEvent1126,conjecture,
? [X1] :
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__IntentionalProcess)
& p__d__subclass(X1,c__Impacting) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commonSubclassEvent1126) ).
fof(miloA1803,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Clapping,c__HandGesture),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',miloA1803) ).
fof(miloA1805,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Clapping,c__Impacting),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',miloA1805) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X1045,X1046,X1047] :
( p__d__subclass(X1045,X1047)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1046,X1047)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1045,X1046) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[predefinitionsA8])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ p__d__subclass(X2,X3)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,X2)
| p__d__subclass(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__SocialInteraction,c__IntentionalProcess),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA2697]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__SocialInteraction)
| p__d__subclass(X1,c__IntentionalProcess) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Communication,c__SocialInteraction),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA2701]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Communication,c__IntentionalProcess),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Communication)
| p__d__subclass(X1,c__IntentionalProcess) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Gesture,c__Communication),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA2713]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Gesture,c__IntentionalProcess),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Gesture)
| p__d__subclass(X1,c__IntentionalProcess) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__HandGesture,c__Gesture),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[miloA1799]) ).
fof(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1] :
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__IntentionalProcess)
& p__d__subclass(X1,c__Impacting) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[commonSubclassEvent1126]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__HandGesture,c__IntentionalProcess),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
fof(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
! [X7881] :
( ~ p__d__subclass(X7881,c__IntentionalProcess)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X7881,c__Impacting) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__HandGesture)
| p__d__subclass(X1,c__IntentionalProcess) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Clapping,c__HandGesture),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[miloA1803]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__IntentionalProcess)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Impacting) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Clapping,c__IntentionalProcess),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Clapping,c__Impacting),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[miloA1805]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR232+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:19:30 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.86/1.17 % Version: 3.5.1
% 2.86/1.17 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.86/1.17 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.86/1.17 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.86/1.17 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.86/1.17 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.86/1.17 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 2.86/1.17 % G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 1160495 completed with status 0
% 2.86/1.17 % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 2.86/1.17 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.86/1.17 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.86/1.17 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.86/1.17 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 2.86/1.17 % No SInE strategy applied
% 2.86/1.17 % Search class: FGHSS-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 2.86/1.17 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 2.86/1.17 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 2.86/1.17 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 2.86/1.17 % Starting G-E--_042_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 113s (1) cores
% 2.86/1.17 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 113s (1) cores
% 2.86/1.17 % Starting G----_0021_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S4S with 113s (1) cores
% 2.86/1.17 % G----_0021_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S4S with pid 1160506 completed with status 0
% 2.86/1.17 % Result found by G----_0021_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S4S
% 2.86/1.17 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.86/1.17 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.86/1.17 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.86/1.17 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 2.86/1.17 % No SInE strategy applied
% 2.86/1.17 % Search class: FGHSS-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 2.86/1.17 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 2.86/1.17 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 2.86/1.17 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 2.86/1.17 % Starting G-E--_042_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 113s (1) cores
% 2.86/1.17 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 113s (1) cores
% 2.86/1.17 % Starting G----_0021_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S4S with 113s (1) cores
% 2.86/1.17 % Preprocessing time : 0.074 s
% 2.86/1.17
% 2.86/1.17 % Proof found!
% 2.86/1.17 % SZS status Theorem
% 2.86/1.17 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.86/1.17 % Parsed axioms : 7433
% 2.86/1.17 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 2.86/1.17 % Initial clauses : 10860
% 2.86/1.17 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 20
% 2.86/1.17 % Initial clauses in saturation : 10840
% 2.86/1.17 % Processed clauses : 2180
% 2.86/1.17 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 2.86/1.17 % ...subsumed : 0
% 2.86/1.17 % ...remaining for further processing : 2180
% 2.86/1.17 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 2.86/1.17 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 2.86/1.17 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 2.86/1.17 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 2.86/1.17 % Generated clauses : 4324
% 2.86/1.17 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4122
% 2.86/1.17 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 2.86/1.17 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 2.86/1.17 % Paramodulations : 4324
% 2.86/1.17 % Factorizations : 0
% 2.86/1.17 % NegExts : 0
% 2.86/1.17 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 2.86/1.17 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 2.86/1.17 % Total rewrite steps : 201
% 2.86/1.17 % ...of those cached : 17
% 2.86/1.17 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 2.86/1.17 % Propositional check models : 0
% 2.86/1.17 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 2.86/1.17 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 2.86/1.17 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 2.86/1.17 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 2.86/1.17 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 2.86/1.17 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 2.86/1.17 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 2.86/1.17 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 2.86/1.17 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 2.86/1.17 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 2.86/1.17 % Current number of processed clauses : 2180
% 2.86/1.17 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1808
% 2.86/1.17 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 2.86/1.17 % Negative unit clauses : 183
% 2.86/1.17 % Non-unit-clauses : 189
% 2.86/1.17 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 12779
% 2.86/1.17 % ...number of literals in the above : 30156
% 2.86/1.17 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 2.86/1.17 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 2.86/1.17 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 16305
% 2.86/1.17 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16221
% 2.86/1.17 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 2.86/1.17 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 134394
% 2.86/1.17 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 2.86/1.17 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 2.86/1.17 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 2.86/1.17 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 2.86/1.17 % Condensation successes : 0
% 2.86/1.17 % Termbank termtop insertions : 571405
% 2.86/1.17 % Search garbage collected termcells : 89336
% 2.86/1.17
% 2.86/1.17 % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.86/1.17 % User time : 0.472 s
% 2.86/1.17 % System time : 0.063 s
% 2.86/1.17 % Total time : 0.535 s
% 2.86/1.17 % Maximum resident set size: 32984 pages
% 2.86/1.17
% 2.86/1.17 % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.86/1.17 % User time : 1.137 s
% 2.86/1.17 % System time : 0.270 s
% 2.86/1.17 % Total time : 1.407 s
% 2.86/1.17 % Maximum resident set size: 12800 pages
% 2.86/1.17 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------