↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : CSR255+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:17:49 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.34s 0.67s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.34s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   27 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   20 (  11   ~;   7   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   0 sgn   6   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(predefinitionsA8,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( p__d__subclass(X2,X3)
        & p__d__subclass(X1,X2) )
     => p__d__subclass(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',predefinitionsA8) ).

fof(subclassEvent0238,conjecture,
    p__d__subclass(c__Laughing,c__BodyMotion),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subclassEvent0238) ).

fof(mergeA2714,axiom,
    p__d__subclass(c__Gesture,c__BodyMotion),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA2714) ).

fof(miloA1786,axiom,
    p__d__subclass(c__FacialExpression,c__Gesture),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',miloA1786) ).

fof(miloA1793,axiom,
    p__d__subclass(c__Laughing,c__FacialExpression),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',miloA1793) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X1045,X1046,X1047] :
      ( p__d__subclass(X1045,X1047)
      | ~ p__d__subclass(X1046,X1047)
      | ~ p__d__subclass(X1045,X1046) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[predefinitionsA8])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p__d__subclass(c__Laughing,c__BodyMotion),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[subclassEvent0238]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( ~ p__d__subclass(X2,X3)
    | ~ p__d__subclass(X1,X2)
    | p__d__subclass(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    p__d__subclass(c__Gesture,c__BodyMotion),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA2714]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    p__d__subclass(c__FacialExpression,c__Gesture),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[miloA1786]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p__d__subclass(c__Laughing,c__BodyMotion),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Gesture)
    | p__d__subclass(X1,c__BodyMotion) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__FacialExpression)
    | p__d__subclass(X1,c__Gesture) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p__d__subclass(c__Laughing,c__BodyMotion),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__FacialExpression)
    | p__d__subclass(X1,c__BodyMotion) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    p__d__subclass(c__Laughing,c__FacialExpression),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[miloA1793]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p__d__subclass(c__Laughing,c__BodyMotion),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : CSR255+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.37  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:15:57 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/0.67  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.34/0.67  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.34/0.67  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.34/0.67  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.34/0.67  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.34/0.67  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.34/0.67  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.34/0.67  % new_bool_3 with pid 2620553 completed with status 0
% 0.34/0.67  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.34/0.67  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.34/0.67  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.34/0.67  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.34/0.67  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.34/0.67  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.34/0.67  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.34/0.67  % Search class: FHHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.34/0.67  % partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.34/0.67  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.34/0.67  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.34/0.67  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2620556 completed with status 0
% 0.34/0.67  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.34/0.67  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.34/0.67  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.34/0.67  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.34/0.67  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.34/0.67  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.34/0.67  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.34/0.67  % Search class: FHHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.34/0.67  % partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.34/0.67  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.34/0.67  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.34/0.67  % Preprocessing time       : 0.006 s
% 0.34/0.67  
% 0.34/0.67  % Proof found!
% 0.34/0.67  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.34/0.67  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.34/0.67  % Parsed axioms                        : 7433
% 0.34/0.67  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 7388
% 0.34/0.67  % Initial clauses                      : 62
% 0.34/0.67  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.34/0.67  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 62
% 0.34/0.67  % Processed clauses                    : 158
% 0.34/0.67  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.34/0.67  % ...subsumed                          : 3
% 0.34/0.67  % ...remaining for further processing  : 155
% 0.34/0.67  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.34/0.67  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.34/0.67  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.34/0.67  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.34/0.67  % Generated clauses                    : 180
% 0.34/0.67  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 161
% 0.34/0.67  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.34/0.67  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 3
% 0.34/0.67  % Paramodulations                      : 180
% 0.34/0.67  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.34/0.67  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.34/0.67  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.34/0.67  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.34/0.67  % Total rewrite steps                  : 14
% 0.34/0.67  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.34/0.67  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.34/0.67  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.34/0.67  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.34/0.67  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.34/0.67  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.34/0.67  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.34/0.67  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.34/0.67  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.34/0.67  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.34/0.67  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.34/0.67  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.34/0.67  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.34/0.67  % Current number of processed clauses  : 155
% 0.34/0.67  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 35
% 0.34/0.67  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.34/0.67  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.34/0.67  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 119
% 0.34/0.67  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 65
% 0.34/0.67  % ...number of literals in the above   : 172
% 0.34/0.67  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.34/0.67  % Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.34/0.67  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1487
% 0.34/0.67  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1362
% 0.34/0.67  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 6
% 0.34/0.67  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 22
% 0.34/0.67  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.34/0.67  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 24
% 0.34/0.67  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.34/0.67  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.34/0.67  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.34/0.67  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 70722
% 0.34/0.67  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 43334
% 0.34/0.67  
% 0.34/0.67  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.34/0.67  % User time                : 0.038 s
% 0.34/0.67  % System time              : 0.026 s
% 0.34/0.67  % Total time               : 0.065 s
% 0.34/0.67  % Maximum resident set size: 20184 pages
% 0.34/0.67  
% 0.34/0.67  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.34/0.67  % User time                : 0.201 s
% 0.34/0.67  % System time              : 0.044 s
% 0.34/0.67  % Total time               : 0.245 s
% 0.34/0.67  % Maximum resident set size: 13056 pages
% 0.34/0.67  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------