↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : CSR256+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:16:12 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 11.39s 7.13s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 11.39s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   24 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   16 (   8   ~;   6   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (   0 sgn   6   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(predefinitionsA8,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( p__d__subclass(X1,X2)
        & p__d__subclass(X2,X3) )
     => p__d__subclass(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',predefinitionsA8) ).

fof(mergeA2519,axiom,
    p__d__subclass(c__ChangeOfPossession,c__SocialInteraction),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA2519) ).

fof(mergeA2523,axiom,
    p__d__subclass(c__Giving,c__ChangeOfPossession),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA2523) ).

fof(subclassEvent0321,conjecture,
    p__d__subclass(c__Funding,c__SocialInteraction),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subclassEvent0321) ).

fof(mergeA2526,axiom,
    p__d__subclass(c__Funding,c__Giving),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA2526) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X7770,X7771,X7772] :
      ( ~ p__d__subclass(X7770,X7771)
      | ~ p__d__subclass(X7771,X7772)
      | p__d__subclass(X7770,X7772) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[predefinitionsA8])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( p__d__subclass(X1,X3)
    | ~ p__d__subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ p__d__subclass(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    p__d__subclass(c__ChangeOfPossession,c__SocialInteraction),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA2519]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( p__d__subclass(X1,c__SocialInteraction)
    | ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__ChangeOfPossession) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    p__d__subclass(c__Giving,c__ChangeOfPossession),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA2523]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    p__d__subclass(c__Giving,c__SocialInteraction),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p__d__subclass(c__Funding,c__SocialInteraction),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[subclassEvent0321])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( p__d__subclass(X1,c__SocialInteraction)
    | ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Giving) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    p__d__subclass(c__Funding,c__Giving),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA2526]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p__d__subclass(c__Funding,c__SocialInteraction),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : CSR256+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 17:14:58 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 11.39/7.13  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 11.39/7.13  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 11.39/7.13  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 11.39/7.13  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 11.39/7.13  % Total time : 6.280s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------