%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR256+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:19:51 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 2.91s 1.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.91s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 26 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 18 ( 10 ~; 6 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 0 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(predefinitionsA8,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( p__d__subclass(X2,X3)
& p__d__subclass(X1,X2) )
=> p__d__subclass(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',predefinitionsA8) ).
fof(mergeA2519,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__ChangeOfPossession,c__SocialInteraction),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA2519) ).
fof(subclassEvent0321,conjecture,
p__d__subclass(c__Funding,c__SocialInteraction),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subclassEvent0321) ).
fof(mergeA2523,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Giving,c__ChangeOfPossession),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA2523) ).
fof(mergeA2526,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Funding,c__Giving),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA2526) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X1045,X1046,X1047] :
( p__d__subclass(X1045,X1047)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1046,X1047)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1045,X1046) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[predefinitionsA8])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ p__d__subclass(X2,X3)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,X2)
| p__d__subclass(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__ChangeOfPossession,c__SocialInteraction),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA2519]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ p__d__subclass(c__Funding,c__SocialInteraction),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[subclassEvent0321]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__ChangeOfPossession)
| p__d__subclass(X1,c__SocialInteraction) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Giving,c__ChangeOfPossession),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA2523]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ p__d__subclass(c__Funding,c__SocialInteraction),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Giving,c__SocialInteraction),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ p__d__subclass(c__Funding,c__SocialInteraction),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Giving)
| p__d__subclass(X1,c__SocialInteraction) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Funding,c__Giving),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA2526]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ p__d__subclass(c__Funding,c__SocialInteraction),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR256+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.38 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:21:53 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.91/1.51 % Version: 3.5.1
% 2.91/1.51 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.91/1.51 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.91/1.51 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.91/1.51 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.91/1.51 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.91/1.51 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 2.91/1.51 % G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 1288328 completed with status 0
% 2.91/1.51 % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 2.91/1.51 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.91/1.51 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.91/1.51 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.91/1.51 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 2.91/1.51 % No SInE strategy applied
% 2.91/1.51 % Search class: FGHSS-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 2.91/1.51 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 2.91/1.51 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 2.91/1.51 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 2.91/1.51 % Starting G-E--_042_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 113s (1) cores
% 2.91/1.51 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 113s (1) cores
% 2.91/1.51 % Starting G----_0021_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S4S with 113s (1) cores
% 2.91/1.51 % G----_0021_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S4S with pid 1288350 completed with status 0
% 2.91/1.51 % Result found by G----_0021_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S4S
% 2.91/1.51 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.91/1.51 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.91/1.51 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.91/1.51 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 2.91/1.51 % No SInE strategy applied
% 2.91/1.51 % Search class: FGHSS-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 2.91/1.51 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 2.91/1.51 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 2.91/1.51 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 2.91/1.51 % Starting G-E--_042_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 113s (1) cores
% 2.91/1.51 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 113s (1) cores
% 2.91/1.51 % Starting G----_0021_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S4S with 113s (1) cores
% 2.91/1.51 % Preprocessing time : 0.150 s
% 2.91/1.51
% 2.91/1.51 % Proof found!
% 2.91/1.51 % SZS status Theorem
% 2.91/1.51 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.91/1.51 % Parsed axioms : 7433
% 2.91/1.51 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 2.91/1.51 % Initial clauses : 10860
% 2.91/1.51 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 20
% 2.91/1.51 % Initial clauses in saturation : 10840
% 2.91/1.51 % Processed clauses : 433
% 2.91/1.51 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 2.91/1.51 % ...subsumed : 0
% 2.91/1.51 % ...remaining for further processing : 433
% 2.91/1.51 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 2.91/1.51 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 2.91/1.51 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 2.91/1.51 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 2.91/1.51 % Generated clauses : 858
% 2.91/1.51 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 836
% 2.91/1.51 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 2.91/1.51 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 2.91/1.51 % Paramodulations : 858
% 2.91/1.51 % Factorizations : 0
% 2.91/1.51 % NegExts : 0
% 2.91/1.51 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 2.91/1.51 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 2.91/1.51 % Total rewrite steps : 19
% 2.91/1.51 % ...of those cached : 0
% 2.91/1.51 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 2.91/1.51 % Propositional check models : 0
% 2.91/1.51 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 2.91/1.51 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 2.91/1.51 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 2.91/1.51 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 2.91/1.51 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 2.91/1.51 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 2.91/1.51 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 2.91/1.51 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 2.91/1.51 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 2.91/1.51 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 2.91/1.51 % Current number of processed clauses : 433
% 2.91/1.51 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 409
% 2.91/1.51 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 2.91/1.51 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 2.91/1.51 % Non-unit-clauses : 22
% 2.91/1.51 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 11243
% 2.91/1.51 % ...number of literals in the above : 26002
% 2.91/1.51 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 2.91/1.51 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 2.91/1.51 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 158
% 2.91/1.51 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 158
% 2.91/1.51 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 2.91/1.51 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3383
% 2.91/1.51 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 2.91/1.51 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 2.91/1.51 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 2.91/1.51 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 2.91/1.51 % Condensation successes : 0
% 2.91/1.51 % Termbank termtop insertions : 543659
% 2.91/1.51 % Search garbage collected termcells : 89321
% 2.91/1.51
% 2.91/1.51 % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.91/1.51 % User time : 0.714 s
% 2.91/1.51 % System time : 0.108 s
% 2.91/1.51 % Total time : 0.822 s
% 2.91/1.51 % Maximum resident set size: 32472 pages
% 2.91/1.51
% 2.91/1.51 % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.91/1.51 % User time : 1.483 s
% 2.91/1.51 % System time : 0.390 s
% 2.91/1.51 % Total time : 1.873 s
% 2.91/1.51 % Maximum resident set size: 13056 pages
% 2.91/1.51 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------