↑ Up

Princess---230619.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : CSR307_1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v9.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr  1 01:53:41 AM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 11.50s 2.30s
% Output   : Proof 14.93s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : CSR307_1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v9.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Mar 31 16:19:35 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.66/0.64  ________       _____
% 0.66/0.64  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.66/0.64  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.66/0.64  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.66/0.64  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.66/0.64  
% 0.66/0.64  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.66/0.64  (2023-06-19)
% 0.66/0.64  
% 0.66/0.64  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.66/0.64  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.66/0.64                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.66/0.64  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.66/0.64  
% 0.66/0.64  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.66/0.64  
% 0.66/0.64  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.66/0.65  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.66/0.67  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.66/0.67  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.66/0.67  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.66/0.67  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.66/0.67  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.66/0.67  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.66/0.67  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 3.96/1.26  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 3.96/1.26  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 3.96/1.30  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 3.96/1.30  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 3.96/1.30  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 3.96/1.30  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 3.96/1.31  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 9.12/1.93  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.12/1.94  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 9.12/1.95  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.12/1.98  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 9.74/2.04  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 10.45/2.09  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 10.69/2.12  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 11.50/2.29  Prover 3: proved (1630ms)
% 11.50/2.30  
% 11.50/2.30  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 11.50/2.30  
% 11.50/2.30  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 12.13/2.30  Prover 2: stopped
% 12.13/2.30  Prover 5: stopped
% 12.13/2.30  Prover 0: stopped
% 12.13/2.30  Prover 6: stopped
% 12.13/2.31  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 12.13/2.31  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 12.13/2.31  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 12.13/2.31  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 12.82/2.39  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 12.82/2.40  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 12.82/2.41  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 12.82/2.41  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 12.82/2.41  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 13.74/2.55  Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 13.74/2.56  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.74/2.58  Prover 1: Found proof (size 28)
% 13.74/2.58  Prover 1: proved (1922ms)
% 13.74/2.58  Prover 4: stopped
% 13.74/2.59  Prover 10: stopped
% 13.74/2.59  Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 13.74/2.59  Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 14.44/2.60  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 14.44/2.60  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 14.44/2.61  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 14.44/2.61  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 14.44/2.61  Prover 13: stopped
% 14.44/2.62  Prover 7: stopped
% 14.44/2.62  Prover 8: stopped
% 14.44/2.67  Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 14.44/2.69  Prover 11: stopped
% 14.44/2.69  
% 14.44/2.69  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 14.44/2.69  
% 14.93/2.69  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 14.93/2.69  Assumptions after simplification:
% 14.93/2.69  ---------------------------------
% 14.93/2.69  
% 14.93/2.69    (keep_not_released)
% 14.93/2.71     ! [v0: fluent] :  ! [v1: int] :  ! [v2: time] : ( ~ (releasedAt(v0, v2) = 0)
% 14.93/2.71      |  ~ (at_time($sum(v1, 1)) = v2) |  ~ fluent(v0) |  ? [v3: time] :  ? [v4:
% 14.93/2.71        any] : (releasedAt(v0, v3) = v4 & at_time(v1) = v3 & time(v3) & (v4 = 0 | 
% 14.93/2.71          ? [v5: event] : (releases(v5, v0, v3) = 0 & happens(v5, v3) = 0 &
% 14.93/2.71            event(v5)))))
% 14.93/2.71  
% 14.93/2.71    (release_from_before)
% 14.93/2.71    fluent(spilling) &  ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: time] :  ? [v2: time] :  ? [v3: int]
% 14.93/2.71    : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & releasedAt(spilling, v2) = v3 & releasedAt(spilling, v1) = 0
% 14.93/2.71      & at_time($sum(v0, 1)) = v1 & at_time(v0) = v2 & time(v2) & time(v1))
% 14.93/2.71  
% 14.93/2.71    (releases_all_defn)
% 14.93/2.71    event(tapOn) &  ! [v0: event] :  ! [v1: fluent] :  ! [v2: int] :  ! [v3: time]
% 14.93/2.71    :  ! [v4: int] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (releases(v0, v1, v3) = v4) |  ~ (at_time(v2) =
% 14.93/2.71        v3) |  ~ event(v0) |  ~ fluent(v1) |  ! [v5: int] : ( ~ (v0 = tapOn) |  ~
% 14.93/2.71        (waterLevel(v5) = v1))) &  ! [v0: event] :  ! [v1: fluent] :  ! [v2: int]
% 14.93/2.71    :  ! [v3: time] : ( ~ (releases(v0, v1, v3) = 0) |  ~ (at_time(v2) = v3) |  ~
% 14.93/2.71      event(v0) |  ~ fluent(v1) |  ? [v4: int] : (v0 = tapOn & waterLevel(v4) =
% 14.93/2.71        v1))
% 14.93/2.71  
% 14.93/2.71    (spilling_not_waterLevel)
% 14.93/2.71    fluent(spilling) &  ! [v0: int] :  ~ (waterLevel(v0) = spilling)
% 14.93/2.71  
% 14.93/2.71    (function-axioms)
% 14.93/2.72     ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: int] :  !
% 14.93/2.72    [v3: fluent] :  ! [v4: time] :  ! [v5: fluent] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 14.93/2.72      (antitrajectory(v5, v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (antitrajectory(v5, v4, v3, v2) =
% 14.93/2.72        v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2:
% 14.93/2.72      int] :  ! [v3: fluent] :  ! [v4: time] :  ! [v5: fluent] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 14.93/2.72      (trajectory(v5, v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (trajectory(v5, v4, v3, v2) = v0)) & 
% 14.93/2.72    ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: time] :  !
% 14.93/2.72    [v3: fluent] :  ! [v4: event] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (releases(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 14.93/2.72      (releases(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 14.93/2.72      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: time] :  ! [v3: fluent] :  ! [v4: time] : (v1 =
% 14.93/2.72      v0 |  ~ (startedIn(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (startedIn(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) &  !
% 14.93/2.72    [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: time] :  ! [v3:
% 14.93/2.72      fluent] :  ! [v4: event] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (initiates(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 14.93/2.72      (initiates(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 14.93/2.72      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: time] :  ! [v3: fluent] :  ! [v4: time] : (v1 =
% 14.93/2.72      v0 |  ~ (stoppedIn(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (stoppedIn(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) &  !
% 14.93/2.72    [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: time] :  ! [v3:
% 14.93/2.72      fluent] :  ! [v4: event] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (terminates(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 14.93/2.72      (terminates(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 14.93/2.72      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: time] :  ! [v3: fluent] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 14.93/2.72      (releasedAt(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (releasedAt(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 14.93/2.72      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: time] :  ! [v3:
% 14.93/2.72      fluent] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (holdsAt(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (holdsAt(v3, v2) = v0))
% 14.93/2.72    &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: time] :  !
% 14.93/2.72    [v3: event] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (happens(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (happens(v3, v2) =
% 14.93/2.72        v0)) &  ! [v0: fluent] :  ! [v1: fluent] :  ! [v2: int] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 14.93/2.72      (waterLevel(v2) = v1) |  ~ (waterLevel(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: time] :  ! [v1:
% 14.93/2.72      time] :  ! [v2: int] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (at_time(v2) = v1) |  ~ (at_time(v2) =
% 14.93/2.72        v0))
% 14.93/2.72  
% 14.93/2.72  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 14.93/2.72  --------------------------------------------
% 14.93/2.72  antitrajectory, change_holding, change_of_waterLevel, distinct_waterLevels,
% 14.93/2.72  filling_not_spilling, filling_not_waterLevel, happens_all_defn, happens_holds,
% 14.93/2.72  happens_not_released, happens_releases, happens_terminates_not_holds,
% 14.93/2.72  initiates_all_defn, keep_holding, keep_not_holding, keep_released,
% 14.93/2.72  not_filling_0, not_released_filling_0, not_released_spilling_0,
% 14.93/2.72  not_released_waterLevel_0, not_spilling_0, same_waterLevel, startedin_defn,
% 14.93/2.72  stoppedin_defn, tapOff_overflow, tapOn_overflow, tapOn_tapOff,
% 14.93/2.72  terminates_all_defn, waterLevel_0
% 14.93/2.72  
% 14.93/2.72  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 14.93/2.72  ---------------------------------
% 14.93/2.72  
% 14.93/2.72  Begin of proof
% 14.93/2.72  | 
% 14.93/2.72  | ALPHA: (spilling_not_waterLevel) implies:
% 14.93/2.73  |   (1)   ! [v0: int] :  ~ (waterLevel(v0) = spilling)
% 14.93/2.73  | 
% 14.93/2.73  | ALPHA: (releases_all_defn) implies:
% 14.93/2.73  |   (2)   ! [v0: event] :  ! [v1: fluent] :  ! [v2: int] :  ! [v3: time] : ( ~
% 14.93/2.73  |          (releases(v0, v1, v3) = 0) |  ~ (at_time(v2) = v3) |  ~ event(v0) | 
% 14.93/2.73  |          ~ fluent(v1) |  ? [v4: int] : (v0 = tapOn & waterLevel(v4) = v1))
% 14.93/2.73  | 
% 14.93/2.73  | ALPHA: (release_from_before) implies:
% 14.93/2.73  |   (3)  fluent(spilling)
% 14.93/2.73  |   (4)   ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: time] :  ? [v2: time] :  ? [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 =
% 14.93/2.73  |            0) & releasedAt(spilling, v2) = v3 & releasedAt(spilling, v1) = 0 &
% 14.93/2.73  |          at_time($sum(v0, 1)) = v1 & at_time(v0) = v2 & time(v2) & time(v1))
% 14.93/2.73  | 
% 14.93/2.73  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 14.93/2.73  |   (5)   ! [v0: time] :  ! [v1: time] :  ! [v2: int] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 14.93/2.73  |          (at_time(v2) = v1) |  ~ (at_time(v2) = v0))
% 14.93/2.73  |   (6)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: time]
% 14.93/2.73  |        :  ! [v3: fluent] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (releasedAt(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 14.93/2.73  |          (releasedAt(v3, v2) = v0))
% 14.93/2.73  | 
% 14.93/2.73  | DELTA: instantiating (4) with fresh symbols all_43_0, all_43_1, all_43_2,
% 14.93/2.73  |        all_43_3 gives:
% 14.93/2.73  |   (7)   ~ (all_43_0 = 0) & releasedAt(spilling, all_43_1) = all_43_0 &
% 14.93/2.73  |        releasedAt(spilling, all_43_2) = 0 & at_time($sum(all_43_3, 1)) =
% 14.93/2.73  |        all_43_2 & at_time(all_43_3) = all_43_1 & time(all_43_1) &
% 14.93/2.73  |        time(all_43_2)
% 14.93/2.73  | 
% 14.93/2.73  | ALPHA: (7) implies:
% 14.93/2.73  |   (8)   ~ (all_43_0 = 0)
% 14.93/2.73  |   (9)  at_time(all_43_3) = all_43_1
% 14.93/2.73  |   (10)  at_time($sum(all_43_3, 1)) = all_43_2
% 14.93/2.73  |   (11)  releasedAt(spilling, all_43_2) = 0
% 14.93/2.73  |   (12)  releasedAt(spilling, all_43_1) = all_43_0
% 14.93/2.73  | 
% 14.93/2.73  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (keep_not_released) with spilling, all_43_3,
% 14.93/2.73  |              all_43_2, simplifying with (3), (10), (11) gives:
% 14.93/2.73  |   (13)   ? [v0: time] :  ? [v1: any] : (releasedAt(spilling, v0) = v1 &
% 14.93/2.73  |           at_time(all_43_3) = v0 & time(v0) & (v1 = 0 |  ? [v2: event] :
% 14.93/2.73  |             (releases(v2, spilling, v0) = 0 & happens(v2, v0) = 0 &
% 14.93/2.73  |               event(v2))))
% 14.93/2.73  | 
% 14.93/2.73  | DELTA: instantiating (13) with fresh symbols all_61_0, all_61_1 gives:
% 14.93/2.74  |   (14)  releasedAt(spilling, all_61_1) = all_61_0 & at_time(all_43_3) =
% 14.93/2.74  |         all_61_1 & time(all_61_1) & (all_61_0 = 0 |  ? [v0: event] :
% 14.93/2.74  |           (releases(v0, spilling, all_61_1) = 0 & happens(v0, all_61_1) = 0 &
% 14.93/2.74  |             event(v0)))
% 14.93/2.74  | 
% 14.93/2.74  | ALPHA: (14) implies:
% 14.93/2.74  |   (15)  at_time(all_43_3) = all_61_1
% 14.93/2.74  |   (16)  releasedAt(spilling, all_61_1) = all_61_0
% 14.93/2.74  |   (17)  all_61_0 = 0 |  ? [v0: event] : (releases(v0, spilling, all_61_1) = 0
% 14.93/2.74  |           & happens(v0, all_61_1) = 0 & event(v0))
% 14.93/2.74  | 
% 14.93/2.74  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_43_1, all_61_1, all_43_3, simplifying
% 14.93/2.74  |              with (9), (15) gives:
% 14.93/2.74  |   (18)  all_61_1 = all_43_1
% 14.93/2.74  | 
% 14.93/2.74  | REDUCE: (16), (18) imply:
% 14.93/2.74  |   (19)  releasedAt(spilling, all_43_1) = all_61_0
% 14.93/2.74  | 
% 14.93/2.74  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_43_0, all_61_0, all_43_1, spilling,
% 14.93/2.74  |              simplifying with (12), (19) gives:
% 14.93/2.74  |   (20)  all_61_0 = all_43_0
% 14.93/2.74  | 
% 14.93/2.74  | BETA: splitting (17) gives:
% 14.93/2.74  | 
% 14.93/2.74  | Case 1:
% 14.93/2.74  | | 
% 14.93/2.74  | |   (21)  all_61_0 = 0
% 14.93/2.74  | | 
% 14.93/2.74  | | COMBINE_EQS: (20), (21) imply:
% 14.93/2.74  | |   (22)  all_43_0 = 0
% 14.93/2.74  | | 
% 14.93/2.74  | | SIMP: (22) implies:
% 14.93/2.74  | |   (23)  all_43_0 = 0
% 14.93/2.74  | | 
% 14.93/2.74  | | REDUCE: (8), (23) imply:
% 14.93/2.74  | |   (24)  $false
% 14.93/2.74  | | 
% 14.93/2.74  | | CLOSE: (24) is inconsistent.
% 14.93/2.74  | | 
% 14.93/2.74  | Case 2:
% 14.93/2.74  | | 
% 14.93/2.74  | |   (25)   ? [v0: event] : (releases(v0, spilling, all_61_1) = 0 & happens(v0,
% 14.93/2.74  | |             all_61_1) = 0 & event(v0))
% 14.93/2.74  | | 
% 14.93/2.74  | | DELTA: instantiating (25) with fresh symbol all_121_0 gives:
% 14.93/2.74  | |   (26)  releases(all_121_0, spilling, all_61_1) = 0 & happens(all_121_0,
% 14.93/2.74  | |           all_61_1) = 0 & event(all_121_0)
% 14.93/2.74  | | 
% 14.93/2.74  | | ALPHA: (26) implies:
% 14.93/2.74  | |   (27)  event(all_121_0)
% 14.93/2.74  | |   (28)  releases(all_121_0, spilling, all_61_1) = 0
% 14.93/2.74  | | 
% 14.93/2.74  | | REDUCE: (18), (28) imply:
% 14.93/2.74  | |   (29)  releases(all_121_0, spilling, all_43_1) = 0
% 14.93/2.74  | | 
% 14.93/2.74  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_121_0, spilling, all_43_3, all_43_1,
% 14.93/2.74  | |              simplifying with (3), (9), (27), (29) gives:
% 14.93/2.74  | |   (30)   ? [v0: int] : (all_121_0 = tapOn & waterLevel(v0) = spilling)
% 14.93/2.74  | | 
% 14.93/2.74  | | DELTA: instantiating (30) with fresh symbol all_128_0 gives:
% 14.93/2.74  | |   (31)  all_121_0 = tapOn & waterLevel(all_128_0) = spilling
% 14.93/2.74  | | 
% 14.93/2.74  | | ALPHA: (31) implies:
% 14.93/2.74  | |   (32)  waterLevel(all_128_0) = spilling
% 14.93/2.74  | | 
% 14.93/2.74  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_128_0, simplifying with (32) gives:
% 14.93/2.74  | |   (33)  $false
% 14.93/2.74  | | 
% 14.93/2.74  | | CLOSE: (33) is inconsistent.
% 14.93/2.74  | | 
% 14.93/2.74  | End of split
% 14.93/2.74  | 
% 14.93/2.74  End of proof
% 14.93/2.74  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 14.93/2.74  
% 14.93/2.74  2102ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------