↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : DAT002_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 01:27:07 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.53s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named 'CODE-FOR-$$SUM')

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff('SOLVE-$$LESS-BY-$$$LESS',axiom,
    ! [X: 'NUMBER',Y: 'NUMBER'] :
      ( $less(X,Y)
      | ~ '$$$LESS'(X,Y) ) ).

tff('SOLVE-$$GREATEREQ-BY-$$$LESS',axiom,
    ! [X: 'NUMBER',Y: 'NUMBER'] :
      ( $greatereq(X,Y)
      | '$$$LESS'(X,Y) ) ).

tff(15,axiom,
    ! [X: $int,Y: $int] :
      ( ~ $less(X,Y)
      | fib_sorted(mycons(X,mycons(Y,nil))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',double_is_fib_sorted_if_ordered) ).

tff(16,axiom,
    ! [X: $int,Y: $int,Z: $int,U: list] :
      ( ~ $less(X,Y)
      | ~ $greatereq(Z,$sum(X,Y))
      | ~ fib_sorted(mycons(Y,mycons(Z,U)))
      | fib_sorted(mycons(X,mycons(Y,mycons(Z,U)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',recursive_fib_sort) ).

tff(17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ fib_sorted(mycons(1,mycons(2,mycons(4,mycons(7,mycons(100,nil)))))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',check_list) ).

tff(18,plain,
    ! [X: $int,Y: $int] :
      ( ~ '$$$LESS'(X,Y)
      | fib_sorted(mycons(X,mycons(Y,nil))) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[15,'SOLVE-$$LESS-BY-$$$LESS']) ).

tff(20,plain,
    ! [X: $int,Y: $int,Z: $int] :
      ( ~ '$$$LESS'(X,Y)
      | ~ '$$$LESS'(Z,X)
      | '$$$LESS'(Y,$sum(Z,X))
      | fib_sorted(mycons(Z,mycons(X,mycons(Y,nil)))) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[16,18,'SOLVE-$$LESS-BY-$$$LESS','SOLVE-$$GREATEREQ-BY-$$$LESS']) ).

tff(23,plain,
    ! [X: $int,Y: $int,Z: $int,U: $int] :
      ( ~ '$$$LESS'(X,Y)
      | ~ '$$$LESS'(Z,X)
      | '$$$LESS'(Y,$sum(Z,X))
      | ~ '$$$LESS'(U,Z)
      | '$$$LESS'(X,$sum(U,Z))
      | fib_sorted(mycons(U,mycons(Z,mycons(X,mycons(Y,nil))))) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[16,20,'SOLVE-$$LESS-BY-$$$LESS','SOLVE-$$GREATEREQ-BY-$$$LESS']) ).

tff(29,plain,
    ! [X: $int,Y: $int,Z: $int,U: $int,V: $int] :
      ( ~ '$$$LESS'(X,Y)
      | ~ '$$$LESS'(Z,X)
      | '$$$LESS'(Y,$sum(Z,X))
      | ~ '$$$LESS'(U,Z)
      | '$$$LESS'(X,$sum(U,Z))
      | ~ '$$$LESS'(V,U)
      | '$$$LESS'(Z,$sum(V,U))
      | fib_sorted(mycons(V,mycons(U,mycons(Z,mycons(X,mycons(Y,nil)))))) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[16,23,'SOLVE-$$LESS-BY-$$$LESS','SOLVE-$$GREATEREQ-BY-$$$LESS']) ).

cnf(39,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[17,29]),'CODE-FOR-$$SUM','CODE-FOR-$$$LESS']) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : DAT002_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Jul  1 17:10:44 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  "."
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-01T17:10:44
% 0.20/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n013.cluster.edu at 2022-07-01T17:10:44
% 0.20/0.53  
% 0.20/0.53  
% 0.20/0.53  #||
% 0.20/0.53  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.53  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.53  ||#
% 0.20/0.53  
% 0.20/0.53  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.20/0.53  ;        64 formulas have been input or derived (from 29 formulas).
% 0.20/0.53  ;        39 (61%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.20/0.53  ;           39 (100%) are still being kept.
% 0.20/0.53  ; 
% 0.20/0.53  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.20/0.53  ;     0.002   4%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.20/0.53  ;     0.001   2%   Assert                       (5 calls)
% 0.20/0.53  ;     0.008  17%   Process new row              (57 calls)
% 0.20/0.53  ;     0.002   4%   Resolution                   (56 calls)
% 0.20/0.53  ;     0.001   2%   Paramodulation               (28 calls)
% 0.20/0.53  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (15 calls)
% 0.20/0.53  ;     0.004   8%   Condensing                   (39 calls)
% 0.20/0.53  ;     0.001   2%   Forward subsumption          (39 calls)
% 0.20/0.53  ;     0.002   4%   Backward subsumption         (31 calls)
% 0.20/0.53  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (14 calls)
% 0.20/0.53  ;     0.003   6%   Forward simplification       (57 calls)
% 0.20/0.53  ;     0.000   0%   Backward simplification      (39 calls)
% 0.20/0.53  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (360 calls)
% 0.20/0.53  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.20/0.53  ;     0.024  50%   Other
% 0.20/0.53  ;     0.048        Total
% 0.20/0.53  ;     0.052        Real time
% 0.20/0.53  ; 
% 0.20/0.53  ; Term-hash-array has 155 terms in all.
% 0.20/0.53  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 31 entries (31 at peak, 31 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.53  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 293 nodes (293 at peak, 293 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.53  ;  Retrieved 14 possibly forward subsuming rows in 39 calls.
% 0.20/0.53  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly backward subsumed rows in 31 calls.
% 0.20/0.53  ; Path-index has 167 entries (167 at peak, 167 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.53  ; Path-index has 211 nodes (211 at peak, 211 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.53  ; Trie-index has 167 entries (167 at peak, 167 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.53  ; Trie-index has 254 nodes (254 at peak, 254 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.53  ; Retrieved 15 generalization terms in 49 calls.
% 0.20/0.53  ; Retrieved 7 instance terms in 7 calls.
% 0.20/0.53  ; Retrieved 109 unifiable terms in 158 calls.
% 0.20/0.53  ; 
% 0.20/0.53  ; The agenda of rows to process has 5 entries:
% 0.20/0.53  ;     1 with value 59              1 with value 65               1 with value 79
% 0.20/0.53  ;     1 with value 63              1 with value 74
% 0.20/0.53  ; The agenda of rows to give has 10 entries:
% 0.20/0.53  ;     1 with value (4 60)          1 with value (4 63)           1 with value (4 73)
% 0.20/0.53  ;     1 with value (4 61)          1 with value (4 68)           1 with value (4 75)
% 0.20/0.53  ;     1 with value (4 62)          2 with value (4 70)           1 with value (4 76)
% 0.20/0.53  Evaluation took:
% 0.20/0.53    0.053 seconds of real time
% 0.20/0.53    0.050336 seconds of user run time
% 0.20/0.53    0.002103 seconds of system run time
% 0.20/0.53    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.20/0.53    0 page faults and
% 0.20/0.53    3,549,912 bytes consed.
% 0.20/0.53  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.20/0.53  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-01T17:10:44
% 0.20/0.53  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.20/0.53  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------