↑ Up

SPASS+T---2.2.22.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS+T---2.2.22
% Problem  : DAT002_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : spasst-tptp-script %s %d

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 01:31:42 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.43s 1.01s
% Output   : Refutation 0.43s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : DAT002_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.04/0.12  % Command  : spasst-tptp-script %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Jul  1 17:10:44 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.46  % Using integer theory
% 0.43/1.01  
% 0.43/1.01  
% 0.43/1.01  % SZS status Theorem for /tmp/SPASST_8713_n013.cluster.edu
% 0.43/1.01  
% 0.43/1.01  SPASS V 2.2.22  in combination with yices.
% 0.43/1.01  SPASS beiseite: Proof found by SPASS.
% 0.43/1.01  Problem: /tmp/SPASST_8713_n013.cluster.edu 
% 0.43/1.01  SPASS derived 6 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses and kept 44 clauses.
% 0.43/1.01  SPASS backtracked 0 times (0 times due to theory inconsistency).
% 0.43/1.01  SPASS allocated 6240 KBytes.
% 0.43/1.01  SPASS spent	0:00:00.01 on the problem.
% 0.43/1.01  		0:00:00.00 for the input.
% 0.43/1.01  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.43/1.01  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.43/1.01  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.43/1.01  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.43/1.01  		0:00:00.00 for interacting with the SMT procedure.
% 0.43/1.01  		
% 0.43/1.01  
% 0.43/1.01  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_8713_n013.cluster.edu
% 0.43/1.01  
% 0.43/1.01  % Here is a proof with depth 5, length 20 :
% 0.43/1.01  2[0:Inp] ||  -> list(nil)*.
% 0.43/1.01  5[0:Inp] || list(U) -> list(mycons(V,U))*.
% 0.43/1.01  6[0:Inp] || less(U,V) -> fib_sorted(mycons(U,mycons(V,nil)))*.
% 0.43/1.01  7[0:Inp] || fib_sorted(mycons(1,mycons(2,mycons(4,mycons(7,mycons(100,nil))))))* -> .
% 0.43/1.01  8[0:Inp] || list(U) fib_sorted(mycons(V,mycons(W,U))) greatereq(W,plus(X,V)) less(X,V) -> fib_sorted(mycons(X,mycons(V,mycons(W,U))))*.
% 0.43/1.01  40[0:TOC:6.0] ||  -> fib_sorted(mycons(U,mycons(V,nil)))* lesseq(V,U).
% 0.43/1.01  41[0:ArS:8.2] || list(U) fib_sorted(mycons(V,mycons(W,U))) lesseq(plus(X,V),W) less(X,V) -> fib_sorted(mycons(X,mycons(V,mycons(W,U))))*.
% 0.43/1.01  42[0:TOC:41.3] || list(U) fib_sorted(mycons(V,mycons(W,U))) -> fib_sorted(mycons(X,mycons(V,mycons(W,U))))* lesseq(V,X) less(W,plus(X,V)).
% 0.43/1.01  43[0:Res:42.4,7.0] || list(mycons(7,mycons(100,nil))) fib_sorted(mycons(2,mycons(4,mycons(7,mycons(100,nil)))))* -> lesseq(2,1) less(4,plus(1,2)).
% 0.43/1.01  44[0:ArS:43.3] || list(mycons(7,mycons(100,nil))) fib_sorted(mycons(2,mycons(4,mycons(7,mycons(100,nil)))))* -> .
% 0.43/1.01  46[0:Res:42.2,44.1] || list(mycons(100,nil)) fib_sorted(mycons(4,mycons(7,mycons(100,nil))))* list(mycons(7,mycons(100,nil))) -> lesseq(4,2) less(7,plus(2,4)).
% 0.43/1.01  48[0:ArS:46.4] || list(mycons(100,nil)) fib_sorted(mycons(4,mycons(7,mycons(100,nil))))* list(mycons(7,mycons(100,nil))) -> .
% 0.43/1.01  49[0:MRR:48.2,5.1] || list(mycons(100,nil)) fib_sorted(mycons(4,mycons(7,mycons(100,nil))))* -> .
% 0.43/1.01  50[0:Res:42.2,49.1] || list(nil) fib_sorted(mycons(7,mycons(100,nil)))* list(mycons(100,nil)) -> lesseq(7,4) less(100,plus(4,7)).
% 0.43/1.01  51[0:ArS:50.4] || list(nil) fib_sorted(mycons(7,mycons(100,nil)))* list(mycons(100,nil)) -> .
% 0.43/1.01  52[0:MRR:51.0,2.0] || fib_sorted(mycons(7,mycons(100,nil)))* list(mycons(100,nil)) -> .
% 0.43/1.01  53[0:Res:40.0,52.0] || list(mycons(100,nil))* -> lesseq(100,7).
% 0.43/1.01  54[0:ArS:53.1] || list(mycons(100,nil))* -> .
% 0.43/1.01  55[0:Res:5.1,54.0] || list(nil)* -> .
% 0.43/1.01  56(e)[0:MRR:55.0,2.0] ||  -> .
% 0.43/1.01  
% 0.43/1.01  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_8713_n013.cluster.edu
% 0.43/1.01  
% 0.43/1.01  Formulae used in the proof : fof_empty_fib_sorted fof_single_is_fib_sorted fof_mycons_type fof_double_is_fib_sorted_if_ordered fof_check_list
% 0.74/1.03  
% 0.74/1.03  SPASS+T ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------