↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : DAT002_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 09:47:04 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.61s 1.11s
% Output   : Refutation 2.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   9 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   52 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   55 (  25   ~;  20   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :  116 (  24 atm;  10 fun;  55 num;  27 var)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr;   1 ari;   0 dat;   0 cdt)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (   5 usr;   9 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (  34   !;   0   ?;  34   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(type_def_5,type,
    list: $tType ).

tff(func_def_0,type,
    nil: list ).

tff(func_def_1,type,
    mycons: ( $int * list ) > list ).

tff(func_def_10,type,
    '$inst0': $int ).

tff(func_def_11,type,
    '$inst1': $int ).

tff(func_def_12,type,
    '$inst2': $int ).

tff(pred_def_1,type,
    fib_sorted: list > $o ).

tff(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0: $int,X1: $int] :
      ( $less(X0,X1)
     => fib_sorted(mycons(X0,mycons(X1,nil))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',double_is_fib_sorted_if_ordered) ).

tff(f4,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $int,X1: $int,X3: list,X2: $int] :
      ( ( $less(X0,X1)
        & fib_sorted(mycons(X1,mycons(X2,X3)))
        & $greatereq(X2,$sum(X0,X1)) )
     => fib_sorted(mycons(X0,mycons(X1,mycons(X2,X3)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',recursive_fib_sort) ).

tff(f5,conjecture,
    fib_sorted(mycons(1,mycons(2,mycons(4,mycons(7,mycons(100,nil)))))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',check_list) ).

tff(f6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ fib_sorted(mycons(1,mycons(2,mycons(4,mycons(7,mycons(100,nil)))))),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f5]) ).

tff(f7,plain,
    ! [X0: $int,X1: $int,X3: list,X2: $int] :
      ( ( $less(X0,X1)
        & fib_sorted(mycons(X1,mycons(X2,X3)))
        & ~ $less(X2,$sum(X0,X1)) )
     => fib_sorted(mycons(X0,mycons(X1,mycons(X2,X3)))) ),
    inference(theory_normalization,[],[f4]) ).

tff(f20,plain,
    ! [X2: list,X0: $int,X1: $int,X3: $int] :
      ( ( $less(X0,X1)
        & ~ $less(X3,$sum(X0,X1))
        & fib_sorted(mycons(X1,mycons(X3,X2))) )
     => fib_sorted(mycons(X0,mycons(X1,mycons(X3,X2)))) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f7]) ).

tff(f21,plain,
    ~ fib_sorted(mycons(1,mycons(2,mycons(4,mycons(7,mycons(100,nil)))))),
    inference(flattening,[],[f6]) ).

tff(f22,plain,
    ! [X0: $int,X1: $int] :
      ( fib_sorted(mycons(X0,mycons(X1,nil)))
      | ~ $less(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tff(f23,plain,
    ! [X2: list,X0: $int,X1: $int,X3: $int] :
      ( fib_sorted(mycons(X0,mycons(X1,mycons(X3,X2))))
      | ~ $less(X0,X1)
      | $less(X3,$sum(X0,X1))
      | ~ fib_sorted(mycons(X1,mycons(X3,X2))) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

tff(f24,plain,
    ! [X0: $int,X3: $int,X2: list,X1: $int] :
      ( $less(X3,$sum(X0,X1))
      | fib_sorted(mycons(X0,mycons(X1,mycons(X3,X2))))
      | ~ fib_sorted(mycons(X1,mycons(X3,X2)))
      | ~ $less(X0,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f23]) ).

tff(f25,plain,
    ! [X0: $int,X1: $int,X2: list,X3: $int] :
      ( $less(X1,$sum(X0,X3))
      | fib_sorted(mycons(X0,mycons(X3,mycons(X1,X2))))
      | ~ fib_sorted(mycons(X3,mycons(X1,X2)))
      | ~ $less(X0,X3) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f24]) ).

tff(f26,plain,
    ! [X0: $int,X1: $int] :
      ( fib_sorted(mycons(X0,mycons(X1,nil)))
      | ~ $less(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

tff(f27,plain,
    ! [X2: list,X3: $int,X0: $int,X1: $int] :
      ( fib_sorted(mycons(X0,mycons(X3,mycons(X1,X2))))
      | $less(X1,$sum(X0,X3))
      | ~ $less(X0,X3)
      | ~ fib_sorted(mycons(X3,mycons(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).

tff(f30,plain,
    ~ fib_sorted(mycons(1,mycons(2,mycons(4,mycons(7,mycons(100,nil)))))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

tff(f33,plain,
    ( ~ $less(1,2)
    | $less(4,$sum(1,2))
    | ~ fib_sorted(mycons(2,mycons(4,mycons(7,mycons(100,nil))))) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f27,f30]) ).

tff(f34,plain,
    ~ fib_sorted(mycons(2,mycons(4,mycons(7,mycons(100,nil))))),
    inference(evaluation,[],[f33]) ).

tff(f35,plain,
    ( $less(7,$sum(2,4))
    | ~ fib_sorted(mycons(4,mycons(7,mycons(100,nil))))
    | ~ $less(2,4) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f34,f27]) ).

tff(f36,plain,
    ~ fib_sorted(mycons(4,mycons(7,mycons(100,nil)))),
    inference(evaluation,[],[f35]) ).

tff(f37,plain,
    ( ~ $less(4,7)
    | $less(100,$sum(4,7))
    | ~ fib_sorted(mycons(7,mycons(100,nil))) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f36,f27]) ).

tff(f38,plain,
    ~ fib_sorted(mycons(7,mycons(100,nil))),
    inference(evaluation,[],[f37]) ).

tff(f146,plain,
    ~ $less(7,100),
    inference(resolution,[],[f26,f38]) ).

tff(f147,plain,
    $false,
    inference(evaluation,[],[f146]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : DAT002_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.16  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.16  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.16  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.16  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.16  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.16  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.16  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.16  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 00:04:40 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.16  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.16  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.20  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.20  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.61/1.11  % (326801)Detected arithmetic, will pick strategies from an ALASCA-aware ARI schedule.
% 2.61/1.11  % (326808)dis+10_3_slsqr=1,4:to=lpo:sil=128000:thi=strong:si=on:uwa=off:s2agt=20:slsqc=1:slsq=on:random_seed=1079791444:i=201:slsql=off:asg=cautious:rtra=on:gtg=all:ss=axioms:sgt=16_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/201Mi)
% 2.61/1.11  % (326808)First to succeed.
% 2.61/1.11  % (326808)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-326801"
% 2.61/1.11  % (326812)lrs+10_1_tgt=ground:sas=z3:si=on:random_seed=3054927553:i=33:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/33Mi)
% 2.61/1.11  % (326811)lrs+10_1_to=lpo:sas=z3:si=on:tha=off:random_seed=920841700:i=46:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/46Mi)
% 2.61/1.11  % (326807)dis+1002_1_to=kbo:sil=128000:tgt=ground:sas=z3:si=on:spb=units:tha=off:random_seed=4215349839:i=307:kws=precedence:nm=0:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/307Mi)
% 2.61/1.11  % (326809)lrs+1002_4:1_to=lpo:sil=64000:si=on:br=off:random_seed=3348954442:s2a=on:i=7:rtra=on:inst=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 2.61/1.11  % (326810)dis+21_64_to=kbo:sil=128000:si=on:sp=weighted_frequency:uwa=alasca_can_abstract:random_seed=3660294467:i=4:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 2.61/1.11  % (326806)dis+1002_16:1_to=lpo:sil=64000:sas=z3:si=on:norm_ineq=on:gve=force:uwa=one_side_constant:random_seed=36565084:i=12:doe=on:rtra=on:gtg=exists_top:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/12Mi)
% 2.61/1.11  % (326810)Instruction limit reached! 
% 2.61/1.11  % (326810)------------------------------
% 2.61/1.11  % (326810)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 2.61/1.11  % (326810)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 2.61/1.11  % (326810)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 2.61/1.11  % (326810)Termination reason: Instruction limit
% 2.61/1.11  % (326810)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.61/1.11  % (326810)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 2.61/1.11  % (326810)Peak memory usage: 88 MB
% 2.61/1.11  % (326810)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 2.61/1.11  % (326809)Instruction limit reached! 
% 2.61/1.11  % (326809)------------------------------
% 2.61/1.11  % (326809)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 2.61/1.11  % (326809)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 2.61/1.11  % (326809)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 2.61/1.11  % (326809)Termination reason: Instruction limit
% 2.61/1.11  % (326809)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.61/1.11  % (326809)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 2.61/1.11  % (326809)Peak memory usage: 88 MB
% 2.61/1.11  % (326809)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 2.61/1.11  % (326806)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.61/1.11  % (326806)------------------------------
% 2.61/1.11  % (326806)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 2.61/1.11  % (326806)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 2.61/1.11  % (326806)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 2.61/1.11  % (326806)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.61/1.11  % (326806)Time elapsed: 0.030 s
% 2.61/1.11  % (326806)Peak memory usage: 115 MB
% 2.61/1.11  % (326806)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 2.61/1.11  % (326811)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 2.61/1.11  % (326807)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.61/1.11  % (326807)------------------------------
% 2.61/1.11  % (326807)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 2.61/1.11  % (326807)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 2.61/1.11  % (326807)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 2.61/1.11  % (326807)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.61/1.11  % (326807)Time elapsed: 0.035 s
% 2.61/1.11  % (326807)Peak memory usage: 115 MB
% 2.61/1.11  % (326807)Instructions burned: 15 (million)
% 2.61/1.11  % (326812)Instruction limit reached! 
% 2.61/1.11  % (326812)------------------------------
% 2.61/1.11  % (326812)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 2.61/1.11  % (326812)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 2.61/1.11  % (326812)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 2.61/1.11  % (326812)Termination reason: Instruction limit
% 2.61/1.11  % (326812)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.61/1.11  % (326812)Time elapsed: 0.045 s
% 2.61/1.11  % (326812)Peak memory usage: 115 MB
% 2.61/1.11  % (326812)Instructions burned: 33 (million)
% 2.61/1.11  % (326808)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 2.61/1.11  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 2.61/1.11  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 2.61/1.11  % (326808)------------------------------
% 2.61/1.11  % (326808)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 2.61/1.11  % (326808)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 2.61/1.11  % (326808)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 2.61/1.11  % (326808)Termination reason: Refutation
% 2.61/1.11  % (326808)Time elapsed: 0.022 s
% 2.61/1.11  % (326808)Peak memory usage: 116 MB
% 2.61/1.11  % (326808)Instructions burned: 15 (million)
% 2.61/1.11  % (326808)------------------------------
% 2.61/1.11  % (326808)------------------------------
% 2.61/1.11  % (326801)Success in time 0.289 s
% 2.61/1.11  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------