%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : SPASS+T---2.2.22 % Problem : DAT011_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : spasst-tptp-script %s %d % Computer : n014.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sat Jul 16 01:31:45 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.70s 1.02s % Output : Refutation 0.70s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.12 % Problem : DAT011_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0. % 0.07/0.12 % Command : spasst-tptp-script %s %d % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jul 1 18:25:40 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.18/0.46 % Using integer theory % 0.70/1.02 % 0.70/1.02 % 0.70/1.02 % SZS status Theorem for /tmp/SPASST_7691_n014.cluster.edu % 0.70/1.02 % 0.70/1.02 SPASS V 2.2.22 in combination with yices. % 0.70/1.02 SPASS beiseite: Proof found by SPASS and SMT. % 0.70/1.02 Problem: /tmp/SPASST_7691_n014.cluster.edu % 0.70/1.02 SPASS derived 155 clauses, backtracked 7 clauses and kept 114 clauses. % 0.70/1.02 SPASS backtracked 3 times (1 times due to theory inconsistency). % 0.70/1.02 SPASS allocated 6359 KBytes. % 0.70/1.02 SPASS spent 0:00:00.02 on the problem. % 0.70/1.02 0:00:00.00 for the input. % 0.70/1.02 0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation. % 0.70/1.02 0:00:00.00 for inferences. % 0.70/1.02 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking. % 0.70/1.02 0:00:00.01 for the reduction. % 0.70/1.02 0:00:00.00 for interacting with the SMT procedure. % 0.70/1.02 % 0.70/1.02 % 0.70/1.02 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_7691_n014.cluster.edu % 0.70/1.02 % 0.70/1.02 % Here is a proof with depth 0, length 8 : % 0.70/1.02 3[0:Inp] || -> array(skc5)*. % 0.70/1.02 4[0:Inp] || -> lesseq(skc7,skc8)*. % 0.70/1.02 5[0:Inp] || -> lesseq(skc8,plus(skc6,1))*. % 0.70/1.02 8[0:Inp] || array(U) -> equal(read(write(U,V,W),V),W)**. % 0.70/1.02 9[0:Inp] || greater(read(write(skc5,plus(skc6,1),3),skc8),0)* -> . % 0.70/1.02 10[0:Inp] || lesseq(U,skc6) lesseq(skc7,U) -> greater(read(skc5,U),0)*. % 0.70/1.02 11[0:Inp] || array(U) -> equal(V,W) equal(read(write(U,V,X),W),read(U,W))**. % 0.70/1.02 261(e)[0:ThR:11,10,9,8,5,4,3] || -> . % 0.70/1.02 % 0.70/1.02 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_7691_n014.cluster.edu % 0.70/1.02 % 0.70/1.02 Formulae used in the proof : fof_array_type fof_co1 fof_write_type fof_ax1 % 0.70/1.02 % 0.70/1.02 SPASS+T ended %------------------------------------------------------------------------------