↑ Up

Beagle---0.9.52.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.52
% Problem  : DAT018_1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Apr  9 06:07:55 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.49s 2.02s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.49s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (  16 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   46 (  14 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   25 (   6   ~;  14   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :  125 (  29 atm;  31 fun;  49 num;  16 var)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr;   1 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (   6 usr;   8 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (  21   !;   1   ?;  22   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ write > read > #nlpp > #skF_1 > #skF_2

%Foreground sorts:
tff(array,type,
    array: $tType ).

%Background operators:
tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $int ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $int ).

%Foreground operators:
tff(write,type,
    write: ( array * $int * $int ) > array ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': array ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': array ).

tff(read,type,
    read: ( array * $int ) > $int ).

tff(f_79,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [U: array,V: array,Wa: $int,Xa: $int] :
        ( ( ( U = write(write(write(V,Wa,3),$sum(Wa,2),2),$sum(Wa,4),1) )
          & $lesseq(Wa,Xa)
          & $lesseq(Xa,$sum(Wa,3)) )
       => ? [Ya: $int] :
            ( $lesseq(Xa,Ya)
            & $lesseq(Ya,$sum(Xa,3))
            & $lesseq(read(U,Ya),3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

tff(f_63,axiom,
    ! [X: array,Ya: $int,Za: $int,X1a: $int] :
      ( ( Ya = Za )
      | ( read(write(X,Ya,X1a),Za) = read(X,Za) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/DAT001_0.ax',ax2) ).

tff(f_59,axiom,
    ! [U: array,Va: $int,Wa: $int] : ( read(write(U,Va,Wa),Va) = Wa ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/DAT001_0.ax',ax1) ).

tff(c_57,plain,
    write(write(write('#skF_2','#skF_3',3),$sum(2,'#skF_3'),2),$sum(4,'#skF_3'),1) = '#skF_1',
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_79]) ).

tff(c_19,plain,
    ! [X_4: array,Y_5a: $int,X1_7a: $int,Z_6a: $int] :
      ( ( read(write(X_4,Y_5a,X1_7a),Z_6a) = read(X_4,Z_6a) )
      | ( Z_6a = Y_5a ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_63]) ).

tff(c_107,plain,
    ! [Z_33a: $int] :
      ( ( read(write(write('#skF_2','#skF_3',3),$sum(2,'#skF_3'),2),Z_33a) = read('#skF_1',Z_33a) )
      | ( Z_33a = $sum(4,'#skF_3') ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_57,c_19]) ).

tff(c_20,plain,
    ! [U_1: array,V_2a: $int,W_3a: $int] : ( read(write(U_1,V_2a,W_3a),V_2a) = W_3a ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_59]) ).

tff(c_135,plain,
    ( ( read('#skF_1',$sum(2,'#skF_3')) = 2 )
    | ( $sum(4,'#skF_3') = $sum(2,'#skF_3') ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_107,c_20]) ).

tff(c_151,plain,
    read('#skF_1',$sum(2,'#skF_3')) = 2,
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_135]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [Y_9a: $int] :
      ( ~ $lesseq(read('#skF_1',Y_9a),3)
      | ~ $lesseq('#skF_4',Y_9a)
      | ~ $lesseq(Y_9a,$sum('#skF_4',3)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_79]) ).

tff(c_18,plain,
    ! [Y_9a: $int] :
      ( $less(3,read('#skF_1',Y_9a))
      | $less(Y_9a,'#skF_4')
      | $less($sum(3,'#skF_4'),Y_9a) ),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LRFIA')],[c_4]) ).

tff(c_173,plain,
    ( $less(3,2)
    | $less($sum(2,'#skF_3'),'#skF_4')
    | $less($sum(3,'#skF_4'),$sum(2,'#skF_3')) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_151,c_18]) ).

tff(c_175,plain,
    ( $less($sum(2,'#skF_3'),'#skF_4')
    | $less($sum(1,'#skF_4'),'#skF_3') ),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_173]) ).

tff(c_185,plain,
    $less($sum(1,'#skF_4'),'#skF_3'),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_175]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    $lesseq('#skF_3','#skF_4'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_79]) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    ~ $less('#skF_4','#skF_3'),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LRFIA')],[c_8]) ).

tff(c_186,plain,
    $false,
    inference(close,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_185,c_16]) ).

tff(c_189,plain,
    $less($sum(2,'#skF_3'),'#skF_4'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_175]) ).

tff(c_84,plain,
    read('#skF_1',$sum(4,'#skF_3')) = 1,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_57,c_20]) ).

tff(c_97,plain,
    ( $less(3,1)
    | $less($sum(4,'#skF_3'),'#skF_4')
    | $less($sum(3,'#skF_4'),$sum(4,'#skF_3')) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_84,c_18]) ).

tff(c_99,plain,
    ( $less($sum(4,'#skF_3'),'#skF_4')
    | $less('#skF_4',$sum(1,'#skF_3')) ),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_97]) ).

tff(c_104,plain,
    $less('#skF_4',$sum(1,'#skF_3')),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_99]) ).

tff(c_191,plain,
    $false,
    inference(close,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_189,c_104]) ).

tff(c_194,plain,
    $less($sum(4,'#skF_3'),'#skF_4'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_99]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    $lesseq('#skF_4',$sum('#skF_3',3)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_79]) ).

tff(c_17,plain,
    ~ $less($sum(3,'#skF_3'),'#skF_4'),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LRFIA')],[c_6]) ).

tff(c_238,plain,
    $false,
    inference(close,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_194,c_17]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : DAT018_1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Apr  7 18:15:38 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.49/2.02  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.49/2.03  
% 3.49/2.03  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------