%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : SPASS+T---2.2.22 % Problem : DAT032_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : spasst-tptp-script %s %d % Computer : n004.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sat Jul 16 01:31:52 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.79s 1.07s % Output : Refutation 0.79s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.06/0.12 % Problem : DAT032_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0. % 0.06/0.13 % Command : spasst-tptp-script %s %d % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jul 1 20:31:23 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.20/0.47 % Using integer theory % 0.79/1.07 % 0.79/1.07 % 0.79/1.07 % SZS status Theorem for /tmp/SPASST_28420_n004.cluster.edu % 0.79/1.07 % 0.79/1.07 SPASS V 2.2.22 in combination with yices. % 0.79/1.07 SPASS beiseite: Proof found by SPASS and SMT. % 0.79/1.07 Problem: /tmp/SPASST_28420_n004.cluster.edu % 0.79/1.07 SPASS derived 108 clauses, backtracked 37 clauses and kept 148 clauses. % 0.79/1.07 SPASS backtracked 3 times (1 times due to theory inconsistency). % 0.79/1.07 SPASS allocated 6352 KBytes. % 0.79/1.07 SPASS spent 0:00:00.03 on the problem. % 0.79/1.07 0:00:00.00 for the input. % 0.79/1.07 0:00:00.01 for the FLOTTER CNF translation. % 0.79/1.07 0:00:00.00 for inferences. % 0.79/1.07 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking. % 0.79/1.07 0:00:00.01 for the reduction. % 0.79/1.07 0:00:00.00 for interacting with the SMT procedure. % 0.79/1.07 % 0.79/1.07 % 0.79/1.07 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_28420_n004.cluster.edu % 0.79/1.07 % 0.79/1.07 % Here is a proof with depth 0, length 6 : % 0.79/1.07 4[0:Inp] || -> collection(skc2)*. % 0.79/1.07 6[0:Inp] || -> greatereq(count(remove(5,skc2)),7)*. % 0.79/1.07 10[0:Inp] || greatereq(count(remove(4,skc2)),6)* -> . % 0.79/1.07 18(e)[0:Inp] || collection(U) -> in(V,U) equal(count(remove(V,U)),count(U))**. % 0.79/1.07 28[0:Inp] || collection(U) in(V,U) -> equal(count(remove(V,U)),minus(count(U),1))**. % 0.79/1.07 236(e)[0:ThR:28,18,10,6,4] || -> . % 0.79/1.07 % 0.79/1.07 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_28420_n004.cluster.edu % 0.79/1.07 % 0.79/1.07 Formulae used in the proof : fof_collection_type fof_ax1 fof_add_type fof_ax4 fof_ax5 % 0.79/1.07 % 0.79/1.07 SPASS+T ended %------------------------------------------------------------------------------