↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : DAT034_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 09:47:09 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.78s 1.07s
% Output   : Refutation 2.78s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (  10 unt;   0 typ;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   48 (  15 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   39 (  16   ~;  14   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :   69 (  12 atm;  21 fun;  21 num;  15 var)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr;   1 ari;   0 dat;   0 cdt)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   4 usr;   4 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (  26   !;   4   ?;  30   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(type_def_5,type,
    collection: $tType ).

tff(func_def_0,type,
    empty: collection ).

tff(func_def_1,type,
    add: ( $int * collection ) > collection ).

tff(func_def_2,type,
    remove: ( $int * collection ) > collection ).

tff(func_def_3,type,
    count: collection > $int ).

tff(func_def_9,type,
    sK0: collection ).

tff(func_def_10,type,
    sK1: $int ).

tff(pred_def_1,type,
    in: ( $int * collection ) > $o ).

tff(f8,axiom,
    ! [X1: collection,X0: $int] :
      ( ~ in(X0,X1)
    <=> ( count(add(X0,X1)) = $sum(count(X1),1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3) ).

tff(f9,axiom,
    ! [X1: collection,X0: $int] :
      ( ( count(add(X0,X1)) = count(X1) )
    <=> in(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax4) ).

tff(f13,conjecture,
    ! [X1: $int,X0: collection] : $greatereq($sum(count(X0),1),count(add(X1,X0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

tff(f14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: $int,X0: collection] : $greatereq($sum(count(X0),1),count(add(X1,X0))),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f13]) ).

tff(f16,plain,
    ~ ! [X1: $int,X0: collection] : ~ $less($sum(count(X0),1),count(add(X1,X0))),
    inference(theory_normalization,[],[f14]) ).

tff(f20,plain,
    ! [X0: collection,X1: $int] :
      ( in(X1,X0)
    <=> ( count(X0) = count(add(X1,X0)) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f9]) ).

tff(f21,plain,
    ~ ! [X1: collection,X0: $int] : ~ $less($sum(count(X1),1),count(add(X0,X1))),
    inference(rectify,[],[f16]) ).

tff(f25,plain,
    ? [X1: collection,X0: $int] : $less($sum(count(X1),1),count(add(X0,X1))),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

tff(f27,plain,
    ! [X1: collection,X0: $int] :
      ( ( ~ in(X0,X1)
        | ( count(add(X0,X1)) != $sum(count(X1),1) ) )
      & ( ( count(add(X0,X1)) = $sum(count(X1),1) )
        | in(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tff(f28,plain,
    ! [X0: collection,X1: $int] :
      ( ( ~ in(X1,X0)
        | ( $sum(count(X0),1) != count(add(X1,X0)) ) )
      & ( ( $sum(count(X0),1) = count(add(X1,X0)) )
        | in(X1,X0) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f27]) ).

tff(f29,plain,
    ! [X0: collection,X1: $int] :
      ( ( in(X1,X0)
        | ( count(X0) != count(add(X1,X0)) ) )
      & ( ( count(X0) = count(add(X1,X0)) )
        | ~ in(X1,X0) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

tff(f33,plain,
    ? [X0: collection,X1: $int] : $less($sum(count(X0),1),count(add(X1,X0))),
    inference(rectify,[],[f25]) ).

tff(f34,plain,
    $less($sum(count(sK0),1),count(add(sK1,sK0))),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1)],[f33]) ).

tff(f42,plain,
    ! [X0: collection,X1: $int] :
      ( in(X1,X0)
      | ( $sum(count(X0),1) = count(add(X1,X0)) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

tff(f45,plain,
    ! [X0: collection,X1: $int] :
      ( ~ in(X1,X0)
      | ( count(X0) = count(add(X1,X0)) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

tff(f51,plain,
    $less($sum(count(sK0),1),count(add(sK1,sK0))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

tff(f75,definition,
    ( spl2_2
  <=> $less($sum(count(sK0),1),count(add(sK1,sK0))) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

tff(f77,plain,
    ( $less($sum(count(sK0),1),count(add(sK1,sK0)))
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f75]) ).

tff(f78,plain,
    spl2_2,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f51,f75]) ).

tff(f112,plain,
    ! [X0: collection,X1: $int] :
      ( ( $sum(count(X0),1) = count(add(X1,X0)) )
      | ( count(X0) = count(add(X1,X0)) ) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f42,f45]) ).

tff(f288,plain,
    ( ( count(add(sK1,sK0)) = count(sK0) )
    | $less($sum(count(sK0),1),$sum(count(sK0),1))
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f77,f112]) ).

tff(f306,definition,
    ( spl2_3
  <=> ( count(add(sK1,sK0)) = count(sK0) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

tff(f310,definition,
    ( spl2_4
  <=> $less($sum(count(sK0),1),$sum(count(sK0),1)) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

tff(f313,plain,
    ( spl2_3
    | spl2_4
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f288,f75,f310,f306]) ).

tff(f315,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_smt_refutation,[],[f313,f78]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : DAT034_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.16  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.16  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.16  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.16  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.16  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.16  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.16  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.16  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 00:10:49 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.16  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.16  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.20  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.20  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168871)Detected arithmetic, will pick strategies from an ALASCA-aware ARI schedule.
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168970)lrs+10_1_to=lpo:sas=z3:si=on:tha=off:random_seed=2572956282:i=46:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/46Mi)
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168964)dis+10_3_slsqr=1,4:to=lpo:sil=128000:thi=strong:si=on:uwa=off:s2agt=20:slsqc=1:slsq=on:random_seed=1284475800:i=201:slsql=off:asg=cautious:rtra=on:gtg=all:ss=axioms:sgt=16_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/201Mi)
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168962)dis+1002_1_to=kbo:sil=128000:tgt=ground:sas=z3:si=on:spb=units:tha=off:random_seed=1714377066:i=307:kws=precedence:nm=0:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/307Mi)
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168961)dis+1002_16:1_to=lpo:sil=64000:sas=z3:si=on:norm_ineq=on:gve=force:uwa=one_side_constant:random_seed=468206249:i=12:doe=on:rtra=on:gtg=exists_top:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/12Mi)
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168970)First to succeed.
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168970)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-4168871"
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168966)lrs+1002_4:1_to=lpo:sil=64000:si=on:br=off:random_seed=3853543089:s2a=on:i=7:rtra=on:inst=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168971)lrs+10_1_tgt=ground:sas=z3:si=on:random_seed=1466805334:i=33:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/33Mi)
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168966)Instruction limit reached! 
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168966)------------------------------
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168966)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168966)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168966)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168966)Termination reason: Instruction limit
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168966)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168966)Time elapsed: 0.009 s
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168966)Peak memory usage: 88 MB
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168966)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168961)Instruction limit reached! 
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168961)------------------------------
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168961)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168961)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168961)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168961)Termination reason: Instruction limit
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168961)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168961)Time elapsed: 0.032 s
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168961)Peak memory usage: 115 MB
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168961)Instructions burned: 12 (million)
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168967)dis+21_64_to=kbo:sil=128000:si=on:sp=weighted_frequency:uwa=alasca_can_abstract:random_seed=3287684843:i=4:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168962)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168967)Instruction limit reached! 
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168967)------------------------------
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168967)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168967)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168967)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168967)Termination reason: Instruction limit
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168967)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168967)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168967)Peak memory usage: 89 MB
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168967)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168971)Instruction limit reached! 
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168971)------------------------------
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168971)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168971)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168971)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168971)Termination reason: Instruction limit
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168971)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168971)Time elapsed: 0.049 s
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168971)Peak memory usage: 116 MB
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168971)Instructions burned: 34 (million)
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168964)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168970)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 2.78/1.07  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 2.78/1.07  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168970)------------------------------
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168970)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168970)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168970)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168970)Termination reason: Refutation
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168970)Time elapsed: 0.027 s
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168970)Peak memory usage: 116 MB
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168970)Instructions burned: 21 (million)
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168970)------------------------------
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168970)------------------------------
% 2.78/1.07  % (4168871)Success in time 0.326 s
% 2.78/1.07  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------