↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : DAT049_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 01:27:22 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.94s 1.11s
% Output   : Refutation 0.94s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named 'CODE-FOR-$$SUM')

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(2,axiom,
    ! [X: $int,Y: collection] : in(X,add(X,Y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/DAT002=0.ax',ax2) ).

tff(25,axiom,
    ! [X: $int,Y: collection] :
      ( in(X,Y)
      | ( count(add(X,Y)) = $sum(count(Y),1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/DAT002=1.ax',ax3) ).

tff(26,plain,
    ! [X: $int,Y: collection] :
      ( in(X,Y)
      | ( count(add(X,Y)) = $sum(1,count(Y)) ) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[25,'CODE-FOR-$$SUM']) ).

tff(29,axiom,
    ! [X: $int,Y: collection] :
      ( ~ in(X,Y)
      | ( count(add(X,Y)) = count(Y) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/DAT002=1.ax',ax4) ).

tff(30,axiom,
    ! [X: $int,Y: collection] :
      ( in(X,Y)
      | ( count(add(X,Y)) != count(Y) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/DAT002=1.ax',ax4) ).

tff(31,axiom,
    ! [X: $int,Y: collection] :
      ( ~ in(X,Y)
      | ( count(remove(X,Y)) = $difference(count(Y),1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/DAT002=1.ax',ax5) ).

tff(32,plain,
    ! [X: $int,Y: collection] :
      ( ~ in(X,Y)
      | ( count(remove(X,Y)) = $sum(-1,count(Y)) ) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[31,'CODE-FOR-$$SUM','CODE-FOR-$$PRODUCT','CODE-FOR-$$UMINUS','CODE-FOR-$$DIFFERENCE']) ).

tff(35,axiom,
    ! [X: $int,Y: collection] :
      ( in(X,Y)
      | ( count(remove(X,Y)) = count(Y) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/DAT002=1.ax',ax6) ).

tff(38,negated_conjecture,
    count(remove('SKOLEMAAAV2.$int',add('SKOLEMAAAV2.$int','SKOLEMAAAV1.collection'))) != count(remove('SKOLEMAAAV2.$int','SKOLEMAAAV1.collection')),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

tff(51,plain,
    ! [X: $int,Y: collection] :
      ( ( count(remove(X,Y)) = count(Y) )
      | ( count(add(X,Y)) = count(Y) ) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[29,35]) ).

tff(70,plain,
    ! [X: $int,Y: collection] :
      ( ( count(add(X,Y)) = $sum(1,count(Y)) )
      | ( count(add(X,Y)) = count(Y) ) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[29,26]) ).

tff(74,plain,
    ! [X: $int,Y: collection] : ( count(remove(X,add(X,Y))) = $sum(-1,count(add(X,Y))) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[32,2]) ).

tff(76,plain,
    $sum(-1,count(add('SKOLEMAAAV2.$int','SKOLEMAAAV1.collection'))) != count(remove('SKOLEMAAAV2.$int','SKOLEMAAAV1.collection')),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[38,74,theory(equality)]) ).

tff(1430,plain,
    ( ( count(add('SKOLEMAAAV2.$int','SKOLEMAAAV1.collection')) = count('SKOLEMAAAV1.collection') )
    | ( count('SKOLEMAAAV1.collection') != count(remove('SKOLEMAAAV2.$int','SKOLEMAAAV1.collection')) ) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[76,70,theory(equality)]),'CODE-FOR-$$SUM']) ).

tff(1470,plain,
    count(add('SKOLEMAAAV2.$int','SKOLEMAAAV1.collection')) = count('SKOLEMAAAV1.collection'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[1430,51]) ).

tff(1471,plain,
    $sum(-1,count('SKOLEMAAAV1.collection')) != count(remove('SKOLEMAAAV2.$int','SKOLEMAAAV1.collection')),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[76,1470,theory(equality)]) ).

tff(1540,plain,
    ~ in('SKOLEMAAAV2.$int','SKOLEMAAAV1.collection'),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[32,1471]) ).

cnf(1604,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[30,1540]),1470,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.13  % Problem  : DAT049_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.10/0.14  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Jul  1 19:21:38 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.48  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.49   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.21/0.49   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.21/0.49   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.21/0.49   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  "."
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-01T19:21:38
% 0.21/0.49  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n008.cluster.edu at 2022-07-01T19:21:38
% 0.94/1.11  
% 0.94/1.11  
% 0.94/1.11  #||
% 0.94/1.11  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.94/1.11  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.94/1.11  ||#
% 0.94/1.11  
% 0.94/1.11  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.94/1.11  ;      5062 formulas have been input or derived (from 193 formulas).
% 0.94/1.11  ;      1604 (32%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.94/1.11  ;          211 (13%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.94/1.11  ;         1393 (87%) are still being kept.
% 0.94/1.11  ; 
% 0.94/1.11  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.94/1.11  ;     0.005   1%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.94/1.11  ;     0.001   0%   Assert                       (13 calls)
% 0.94/1.11  ;     0.143  23%   Process new row              (4,695 calls)
% 0.94/1.11  ;     0.065  11%   Resolution                   (384 calls)
% 0.94/1.11  ;     0.024   4%   Paramodulation               (192 calls)
% 0.94/1.11  ;     0.001   0%   Factoring                    (45 calls)
% 0.94/1.11  ;     0.020   3%   Condensing                   (1,270 calls)
% 0.94/1.11  ;     0.063  10%   Forward subsumption          (1,270 calls)
% 0.94/1.11  ;     0.033   5%   Backward subsumption         (926 calls)
% 0.94/1.11  ;     0.014   2%   Clause clause subsumption    (2,249 calls)
% 0.94/1.11  ;     0.150  24%   Forward simplification       (4,671 calls)
% 0.94/1.11  ;     0.025   4%   Backward simplification      (1,600 calls)
% 0.94/1.11  ;     0.007   1%   Ordering                     (2,638 calls)
% 0.94/1.11  ;     0.000   0%   Ordering ac                  (10 calls)
% 0.94/1.11  ;     0.017   3%   Sortal reasoning             (13,902 calls)
% 0.94/1.11  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.94/1.11  ;     0.047   8%   Other
% 0.94/1.11  ;     0.615        Total
% 0.94/1.11  ;     0.617        Real time
% 0.94/1.11  ; 
% 0.94/1.11  ; Term-hash-array has 4,073 terms in all.
% 0.94/1.11  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 908 entries (918 at peak, 926 added, 18 deleted).
% 0.94/1.11  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 8,539 nodes (8,761 at peak, 8,909 added, 370 deleted).
% 0.94/1.11  ;  Retrieved 3,739 possibly forward subsuming rows in 1,270 calls.
% 0.94/1.11  ;  Retrieved 98 possibly backward subsumed rows in 926 calls.
% 0.94/1.11  ; Path-index has 3,656 entries (3,688 at peak, 4,238 added, 582 deleted).
% 0.94/1.11  ; Path-index has 5,145 nodes (5,309 at peak, 5,781 added, 636 deleted).
% 0.94/1.11  ; Trie-index has 3,656 entries (3,688 at peak, 4,238 added, 582 deleted).
% 0.94/1.11  ; Trie-index has 8,590 nodes (8,820 at peak, 10,253 added, 1,663 deleted).
% 0.94/1.11  ; Retrieved 12,280 generalization terms in 32,925 calls.
% 0.94/1.11  ; Retrieved 722 instance terms in 673 calls.
% 0.94/1.11  ; Retrieved 30,314 unifiable terms in 2,296 calls.
% 0.94/1.11  ; 
% 0.94/1.11  ; The agenda of rows to process has 8 entries:
% 0.94/1.11  ;     3 with value 14              2 with value 17               3 with value 19
% 0.94/1.11  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 1 entry:
% 0.94/1.11  ;     1 with value 10
% 0.94/1.11  ; The agenda of rows to give has 1208 entries:
% 0.94/1.11  ;     1 with value (4 9)          50 with value (4 25)          48 with value (4 38)
% 0.94/1.11  ;     1 with value (4 11)         72 with value (4 26)          62 with value (4 39)
% 0.94/1.11  ;     1 with value (4 12)         37 with value (4 27)          27 with value (4 40)
% 0.94/1.11  ;     2 with value (4 13)         60 with value (4 28)          54 with value (4 41)
% 0.94/1.11  ;     1 with value (4 14)         46 with value (4 29)          41 with value (4 42)
% 0.94/1.11  ;     3 with value (4 17)         66 with value (4 30)          14 with value (4 43)
% 0.94/1.11  ;     2 with value (4 18)         67 with value (4 31)          27 with value (4 44)
% 0.94/1.11  ;     2 with value (4 19)        104 with value (4 32)           8 with value (4 45)
% 0.94/1.11  ;     4 with value (4 20)         49 with value (4 33)          14 with value (4 46)
% 0.94/1.11  ;     6 with value (4 21)         83 with value (4 34)           6 with value (4 47)
% 0.94/1.11  ;     4 with value (4 22)         73 with value (4 35)           6 with value (4 48)
% 0.94/1.11  ;    24 with value (4 23)         62 with value (4 36)           2 with value (4 49)
% 0.94/1.11  ;    32 with value (4 24)         47 with value (4 37)
% 0.94/1.11  Evaluation took:
% 0.94/1.11    0.618 seconds of real time
% 0.94/1.11    0.554505 seconds of user run time
% 0.94/1.11    0.064046 seconds of system run time
% 0.94/1.11    [Run times include 0.037 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.94/1.11    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.94/1.11    0 page faults and
% 0.94/1.11    45,649,824 bytes consed.
% 0.94/1.11  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.94/1.11  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-01T19:21:39
% 0.94/1.11  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.94/1.11  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------