%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS+T---2.2.22
% Problem : DAT058_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : spasst-tptp-script %s %d
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 01:32:00 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.77s 1.05s
% Output : Refutation 0.77s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 1
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 5 unt; 1 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 19 ( 0 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
data(none),
file('DAT058=1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(2,axiom,
array(mkarray),
file('DAT058=1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(5,axiom,
equal(get(mkarray,U),none),
file('DAT058=1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(7,axiom,
~ equal(put(mkarray,skc3,none),mkarray),
file('DAT058=1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(8,axiom,
( ~ array(U)
| ~ data(V)
| array(put(U,W,V)) ),
file('DAT058=1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(9,axiom,
( ~ array(U)
| ~ data(V)
| equal(get(put(U,W,V),W),V) ),
file('DAT058=1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(11,axiom,
( ~ data(U)
| ~ array(V)
| equal(W,X)
| equal(get(put(V,X,U),W),get(V,W)) ),
file('DAT058=1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(13,axiom,
( ~ array(U)
| ~ array(V)
| ~ equal(get(U,skf1(V,U)),get(V,skf1(V,U)))
| equal(U,V) ),
file('DAT058=1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(205,plain,
$false,
inference(thr,[status(thm)],[13,11,9,8,7,5,2,1]),
[iquote('0:ThR:13,11,9,8,7,5,2,1')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : DAT058_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.5.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : spasst-tptp-script %s %d
% 0.14/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jul 1 20:34:08 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 % Using integer theory
% 0.77/1.05
% 0.77/1.05
% 0.77/1.05 % SZS status Theorem for /tmp/SPASST_18208_n027.cluster.edu
% 0.77/1.05
% 0.77/1.05 SPASS V 2.2.22 in combination with yices.
% 0.77/1.05 SPASS beiseite: Proof found by SMT.
% 0.77/1.05 Problem: /tmp/SPASST_18208_n027.cluster.edu
% 0.77/1.05 SPASS derived 92 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses and kept 79 clauses.
% 0.77/1.05 SPASS backtracked 1 times (1 times due to theory inconsistency).
% 0.77/1.05 SPASS allocated 6448 KBytes.
% 0.77/1.05 SPASS spent 0:00:00.03 on the problem.
% 0.77/1.05 0:00:00.00 for the input.
% 0.77/1.05 0:00:00.01 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.77/1.05 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.77/1.05 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.77/1.05 0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.77/1.05 0:00:00.00 for interacting with the SMT procedure.
% 0.77/1.05
% 0.77/1.05
% 0.77/1.05 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_18208_n027.cluster.edu
% See solution above
% 0.77/1.05
% 0.77/1.05 Formulae used in the proof : fof_none_type fof_data_type fof_get_type fof_th_lem_2 fof_put_type fof_ax_21 fof_ax_20
% 0.77/1.05
% 0.77/1.05 SPASS+T ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------