↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : DAT066_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 09:48:03 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.26s 0.36s
% Output   : Refutation 0.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   5 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   17 (  16 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   13 (   7   ~;   4   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :   30 (   0 atm;   8 fun;   8 num;  14 var)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr;   1 ari;   0 dat;   0 cdt)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (  18   !;   3   ?;  21   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(type_def_5,type,
    heap: $tType ).

tff(func_def_0,type,
    empty: heap ).

tff(func_def_1,type,
    toop: heap > $int ).

tff(func_def_2,type,
    sel: ( heap * $int ) > $int ).

tff(func_def_3,type,
    length: heap > $int ).

tff(func_def_4,type,
    app: ( heap * $int ) > heap ).

tff(func_def_5,type,
    get: heap > heap ).

tff(func_def_10,type,
    sK0: $int ).

tff(func_def_11,type,
    sK1: $int ).

tff(func_def_12,type,
    sK2: heap ).

tff(pred_def_1,type,
    lsls: ( heap * heap ) > $o ).

tff(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0: heap,X1: $int,X2: $int] :
      ( ( X1 = $sum(1,length(X0)) )
     => ( sel(app(X0,X2),X1) = X2 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/DAT006_0.ax',ax_2) ).

tff(f15,conjecture,
    ! [X0: $int,X1: $int,X2: heap] :
      ( ( sel(app(X2,X0),X1) = X0 )
      | ( X1 != $sum(1,length(X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',th_1) ).

tff(f16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: $int,X1: $int,X2: heap] :
        ( ( sel(app(X2,X0),X1) = X0 )
        | ( X1 != $sum(1,length(X2)) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f15]) ).

tff(f29,plain,
    ! [X0: heap,X1: $int,X2: $int] :
      ( ( sel(app(X0,X2),X1) = X2 )
      | ( $sum(1,length(X0)) != X1 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tff(f33,plain,
    ? [X0: $int,X1: $int,X2: heap] :
      ( ( sel(app(X2,X0),X1) != X0 )
      & ( $sum(1,length(X2)) = X1 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tff(f35,plain,
    ! [X2: $int,X0: heap,X1: $int] :
      ( ( $sum(1,length(X0)) != X1 )
      | ( sel(app(X0,X2),X1) = X2 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

tff(f52,plain,
    sK1 = $sum(1,length(sK2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

tff(f53,plain,
    sK0 != sel(app(sK2,sK0),sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

tff(f54,plain,
    ! [X2: $int,X0: heap] : ( sel(app(X0,X2),$sum(1,length(X0))) = X2 ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f35]) ).

tff(f157,plain,
    ! [X0: $int] : ( sel(app(sK2,X0),sK1) = X0 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f54,f52]) ).

tff(f184,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f53,f157]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : DAT066_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.5.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.11/0.27  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.27  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.27  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.27  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.27  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.27  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.27  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.27  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 00:09:55 UTC 2026
% 0.26/0.27  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.26/0.28  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.26/0.32  Running first-order model finding
% 0.26/0.32  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/0.36  % (3913046)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.26/0.36  % (3913052)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.26/0.36  % (3913052)dis+11_61:31_drc=ordering:lsd=5:bsr=unit_only:rp=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=2230005715:i=135531:add=off:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/135531Mi)
% 0.26/0.36  % (3913052) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-3913046-3913052"...
% 0.26/0.36  % (3913052)...printing done.
% 0.26/0.36  % (3913052)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.26/0.36  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.26/0.36  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.26/0.36  % (3913052)------------------------------
% 0.26/0.36  % (3913052)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.26/0.36  % (3913052)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.26/0.36  % (3913052)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.26/0.36  % (3913052)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.26/0.36  % (3913052)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.26/0.36  % (3913052)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.26/0.36  % (3913052)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 0.26/0.36  % (3913046)Success in time 0.03 s
% 0.26/0.36  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------