↑ Up

Princess---230619.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : DAT079_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:19:07 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 6.48s 1.63s
% Output   : Proof 8.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : DAT079_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.1.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug 24 14:04:30 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.58  ________       _____
% 0.19/0.58  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.19/0.58  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.19/0.58  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.19/0.58  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.19/0.58  
% 0.19/0.58  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.19/0.58  (2023-06-19)
% 0.19/0.58  
% 0.19/0.58  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.19/0.58  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.19/0.58                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.19/0.58  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.19/0.58  
% 0.19/0.58  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.19/0.58  
% 0.19/0.58  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.19/0.59  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.19/0.62  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.19/0.62  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.19/0.62  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.19/0.62  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.19/0.62  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.19/0.62  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.19/0.62  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 2.09/1.04  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.09/1.04  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.77/1.08  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.77/1.08  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.77/1.08  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.77/1.08  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.77/1.08  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 4.92/1.42  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.92/1.43  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.92/1.44  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.92/1.45  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 4.92/1.45  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 4.92/1.45  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 4.92/1.47  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 6.48/1.63  Prover 3: proved (1018ms)
% 6.48/1.63  
% 6.48/1.63  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.48/1.63  
% 6.48/1.64  Prover 2: stopped
% 6.48/1.64  Prover 0: stopped
% 6.48/1.64  Prover 5: stopped
% 6.48/1.64  Prover 6: stopped
% 6.48/1.65  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 6.48/1.65  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 6.48/1.65  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 6.48/1.65  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 6.48/1.65  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 6.48/1.70  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 6.48/1.70  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 6.48/1.71  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 6.48/1.71  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 7.13/1.72  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 7.13/1.76  Prover 4: Found proof (size 14)
% 7.13/1.76  Prover 4: proved (1155ms)
% 7.13/1.77  Prover 1: stopped
% 7.63/1.80  Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 7.63/1.80  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.63/1.81  Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 7.63/1.81  Prover 7: stopped
% 7.63/1.82  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.63/1.82  Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 7.63/1.83  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 7.63/1.83  Prover 13: stopped
% 7.63/1.83  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.63/1.83  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.63/1.83  Prover 10: stopped
% 7.63/1.84  Prover 8: stopped
% 7.63/1.84  Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.63/1.85  Prover 11: stopped
% 7.63/1.85  
% 7.63/1.85  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.63/1.85  
% 7.63/1.85  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 7.63/1.86  Assumptions after simplification:
% 7.63/1.86  ---------------------------------
% 7.63/1.86  
% 7.63/1.86    (c)
% 8.15/1.88    list(nil) &  ? [v0: list] :  ? [v1: list] :  ? [v2: list] :  ? [v3: int] : ( ~
% 8.15/1.88      (v3 = 0) & in(2, v2) = v3 & cons(3, nil) = v0 & cons(2, v0) = v1 & cons(1,
% 8.15/1.88        v1) = v2 & list(v2) & list(v1) & list(v0))
% 8.15/1.88  
% 8.15/1.88    (in_conv)
% 8.15/1.88     ! [v0: int] :  ! [v1: list] :  ! [v2: int] :  ! [v3: int] :  ! [v4: list] :
% 8.15/1.88    (v2 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ (cons(v3, v4) = v1) |  ~ list(v4) |  ~
% 8.15/1.88      list(v1) |  ? [v5: int] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & in(v0, v4) = v5)) &  ! [v0: int] : 
% 8.15/1.88    ! [v1: list] :  ! [v2: int] :  ! [v3: list] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0, v1) = v2) |
% 8.15/1.88       ~ (cons(v0, v3) = v1) |  ~ list(v3) |  ~ list(v1)) &  ! [v0: int] :  ! [v1:
% 8.15/1.88      list] : ( ~ (in(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ list(v1) |  ? [v2: int] :  ? [v3: list] : 
% 8.15/1.88      ? [v4: list] :  ? [v5: int] :  ? [v6: int] :  ? [v7: list] :  ? [v8: list] :
% 8.15/1.88      (list(v7) & list(v3) & ((v8 = v1 & v6 = v0 & cons(v0, v7) = v1) | (v5 = 0 &
% 8.15/1.88            v4 = v1 & in(v0, v3) = 0 & cons(v2, v3) = v1))))
% 8.15/1.88  
% 8.15/1.88  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 8.15/1.88  --------------------------------------------
% 8.15/1.88  a, a_3, a_4, a_8, inRange, l, l1, l2, l3, l4, l_1, l_6, l_7
% 8.15/1.88  
% 8.15/1.88  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 8.15/1.88  ---------------------------------
% 8.15/1.88  
% 8.15/1.88  Begin of proof
% 8.15/1.88  | 
% 8.15/1.88  | ALPHA: (in_conv) implies:
% 8.15/1.89  |   (1)   ! [v0: int] :  ! [v1: list] :  ! [v2: int] :  ! [v3: list] : (v2 = 0 |
% 8.15/1.89  |           ~ (in(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ (cons(v0, v3) = v1) |  ~ list(v3) |  ~
% 8.15/1.89  |          list(v1))
% 8.15/1.89  |   (2)   ! [v0: int] :  ! [v1: list] :  ! [v2: int] :  ! [v3: int] :  ! [v4:
% 8.15/1.89  |          list] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ (cons(v3, v4) = v1) |  ~
% 8.15/1.89  |          list(v4) |  ~ list(v1) |  ? [v5: int] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & in(v0, v4) =
% 8.15/1.89  |            v5))
% 8.15/1.89  | 
% 8.15/1.89  | ALPHA: (c) implies:
% 8.15/1.89  |   (3)   ? [v0: list] :  ? [v1: list] :  ? [v2: list] :  ? [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3
% 8.15/1.89  |            = 0) & in(2, v2) = v3 & cons(3, nil) = v0 & cons(2, v0) = v1 &
% 8.15/1.89  |          cons(1, v1) = v2 & list(v2) & list(v1) & list(v0))
% 8.15/1.89  | 
% 8.15/1.89  | DELTA: instantiating (3) with fresh symbols all_19_0, all_19_1, all_19_2,
% 8.15/1.89  |        all_19_3 gives:
% 8.15/1.89  |   (4)   ~ (all_19_0 = 0) & in(2, all_19_1) = all_19_0 & cons(3, nil) =
% 8.15/1.89  |        all_19_3 & cons(2, all_19_3) = all_19_2 & cons(1, all_19_2) = all_19_1
% 8.15/1.89  |        & list(all_19_1) & list(all_19_2) & list(all_19_3)
% 8.15/1.89  | 
% 8.15/1.89  | ALPHA: (4) implies:
% 8.15/1.89  |   (5)   ~ (all_19_0 = 0)
% 8.15/1.89  |   (6)  list(all_19_3)
% 8.15/1.89  |   (7)  list(all_19_2)
% 8.15/1.89  |   (8)  list(all_19_1)
% 8.15/1.89  |   (9)  cons(1, all_19_2) = all_19_1
% 8.15/1.89  |   (10)  cons(2, all_19_3) = all_19_2
% 8.15/1.89  |   (11)  in(2, all_19_1) = all_19_0
% 8.15/1.89  | 
% 8.15/1.89  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with 2, all_19_1, all_19_0, 1, all_19_2,
% 8.15/1.90  |              simplifying with (7), (8), (9), (11) gives:
% 8.15/1.90  |   (12)  all_19_0 = 0 |  ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & in(2, all_19_2) = v0)
% 8.15/1.90  | 
% 8.15/1.90  | BETA: splitting (12) gives:
% 8.15/1.90  | 
% 8.15/1.90  | Case 1:
% 8.15/1.90  | | 
% 8.15/1.90  | |   (13)  all_19_0 = 0
% 8.15/1.90  | | 
% 8.15/1.90  | | REDUCE: (5), (13) imply:
% 8.15/1.90  | |   (14)  $false
% 8.15/1.90  | | 
% 8.15/1.90  | | CLOSE: (14) is inconsistent.
% 8.15/1.90  | | 
% 8.15/1.90  | Case 2:
% 8.15/1.90  | | 
% 8.15/1.90  | |   (15)   ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & in(2, all_19_2) = v0)
% 8.15/1.90  | | 
% 8.15/1.90  | | DELTA: instantiating (15) with fresh symbol all_43_0 gives:
% 8.15/1.90  | |   (16)   ~ (all_43_0 = 0) & in(2, all_19_2) = all_43_0
% 8.15/1.90  | | 
% 8.15/1.90  | | ALPHA: (16) implies:
% 8.15/1.90  | |   (17)   ~ (all_43_0 = 0)
% 8.15/1.90  | |   (18)  in(2, all_19_2) = all_43_0
% 8.15/1.90  | | 
% 8.15/1.90  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with 2, all_19_2, all_43_0, all_19_3,
% 8.15/1.90  | |              simplifying with (6), (7), (10), (18) gives:
% 8.15/1.90  | |   (19)  all_43_0 = 0
% 8.15/1.90  | | 
% 8.15/1.90  | | REDUCE: (17), (19) imply:
% 8.15/1.90  | |   (20)  $false
% 8.15/1.90  | | 
% 8.15/1.90  | | CLOSE: (20) is inconsistent.
% 8.15/1.90  | | 
% 8.15/1.90  | End of split
% 8.15/1.90  | 
% 8.15/1.90  End of proof
% 8.15/1.90  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 8.15/1.90  
% 8.15/1.90  1317ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------