%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : SPASS+T---2.2.22 % Problem : DAT079_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : spasst-tptp-script %s %d % Computer : n012.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sat Jul 16 01:32:07 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.83s 1.09s % Output : Refutation 0.83s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.12 % Problem : DAT079_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.1.0. % 0.03/0.12 % Command : spasst-tptp-script %s %d % 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jul 1 19:56:02 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.19/0.46 % Using integer theory % 0.83/1.09 % 0.83/1.09 % 0.83/1.09 % SZS status Theorem for /tmp/SPASST_23293_n012.cluster.edu % 0.83/1.09 % 0.83/1.09 SPASS V 2.2.22 in combination with yices. % 0.83/1.09 SPASS beiseite: Proof found by SMT. % 0.83/1.09 Problem: /tmp/SPASST_23293_n012.cluster.edu % 0.83/1.09 SPASS derived 192 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses and kept 129 clauses. % 0.83/1.09 SPASS backtracked 1 times (1 times due to theory inconsistency). % 0.83/1.09 SPASS allocated 6538 KBytes. % 0.83/1.09 SPASS spent 0:00:00.05 on the problem. % 0.83/1.09 0:00:00.00 for the input. % 0.83/1.09 0:00:00.01 for the FLOTTER CNF translation. % 0.83/1.09 0:00:00.00 for inferences. % 0.83/1.09 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking. % 0.83/1.09 0:00:00.02 for the reduction. % 0.83/1.09 0:00:00.00 for interacting with the SMT procedure. % 0.83/1.09 % 0.83/1.09 % 0.83/1.09 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_23293_n012.cluster.edu % 0.83/1.09 % 0.83/1.09 % Here is a proof with depth 0, length 6 : % 0.83/1.09 4[0:Inp] || -> list(nil)*. % 0.83/1.09 13[0:Inp] || list(U) -> list(cons(V,U))*. % 0.83/1.09 20[0:Inp] || in(2,cons(1,cons(2,cons(3,nil))))* -> . % 0.83/1.09 29[0:Inp] || list(U) list(V) equal(V,cons(W,U))*+ -> in(W,V)*. % 0.83/1.09 32(e)[0:Inp] || list(U) list(V) in(W,U)* equal(V,cons(X,U))* -> in(W,V)*. % 0.83/1.09 388(e)[0:ThR:32,29,20,13,4] || -> . % 0.83/1.09 % 0.83/1.09 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_23293_n012.cluster.edu % 0.83/1.09 % 0.83/1.09 Formulae used in the proof : fof_head_type fof_tail_type fof_t_5 fof_inRange fof_nil_type fof_l_6 % 0.83/1.10 % 0.83/1.10 SPASS+T ended %------------------------------------------------------------------------------