↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : DAT280^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 07:48:12 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.69s 2.19s
% Output   : Refutation 3.84s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (  13 unt;   0 typ;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   17 (  16 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  127 (   9   ~;   1   |;   0   &; 117   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   3 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   27 (  27   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-7 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   47 (   0   ^;  45   !;   0   ?;  47   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   2  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(skt1_type,type,
    skt1: $tType ).

thf(skt2_type,type,
    skt2: $tType ).

thf(skt3_type,type,
    skt3: $tType ).

thf('const/lists/ITLIST2_decl',type,
    'const/lists/ITLIST2': 
      !>[TA: $tType,TB: $tType,TC: $tType] : ( ( TC > TB > TA > TA ) > ( 'type/ind_types/list' @ TC ) > ( 'type/ind_types/list' @ TB ) > TA > TA ) ).

thf('const/ind_types/NIL_decl',type,
    'const/ind_types/NIL': 
      !>[TA: $tType] : ( 'type/ind_types/list' @ TA ) ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: skt1 > skt2 > skt3 > skt3 ).

thf(sk2_decl,type,
    sk2: skt3 ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( @+[A: skt1 > skt2 > skt3 > skt3] :
          ~ ! [B: skt3] :
              ( ( 'const/lists/ITLIST2' @ skt1 @ skt2 @ skt3 @ A @ ( 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ skt1 ) @ ( 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ skt2 ) @ B )
              = B ) ) ) ).

thf(sk2_def,definition,
    ( sk2
    = ( @+[A: skt3] :
          ( ( 'const/lists/ITLIST2' @ skt1 @ skt2 @ skt3 @ sk1 @ ( 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ skt1 ) @ ( 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ skt2 ) @ A )
         != A ) ) ) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [TA: $tType,TB: $tType,TC: $tType,A: TC > TB > TA > TA,B: 'type/ind_types/list' @ TB,C: TA] :
      ( ( 'const/lists/ITLIST2' @ TC @ TB @ TA @ A @ ( 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ TC ) @ B @ C )
      = C ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','thm/lists/ITLIST2_DEF_0') ).

thf(7,plain,
    ! [TA: $tType,TB: $tType,TC: $tType,A: TC > TB > TA > TA,B: 'type/ind_types/list' @ TB,C: TA] :
      ( ( 'const/lists/ITLIST2' @ TC @ TB @ TA @ A @ ( 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ TC ) @ B @ C )
      = C ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ! [TA: $tType,TB: $tType,TC: $tType,C: TC,B: 'type/ind_types/list' @ TB,A: TA > TB > TC > TC] :
      ( ( 'const/lists/ITLIST2' @ TA @ TB @ TC @ A @ ( 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ TA ) @ B @ C )
      = C ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[7]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ! [TA: $tType,TB: $tType,TC: $tType,C: TC,B: 'type/ind_types/list' @ TB,A: TA > TB > TC > TC] :
      ( ( 'const/lists/ITLIST2' @ TA @ TB @ TC @ A @ ( 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ TA ) @ B @ C )
      = C ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [TA: $tType,TB: $tType,TC: $tType,A: TC > TB > TA > TA,B: TA] :
      ( ( 'const/lists/ITLIST2' @ TC @ TB @ TA @ A @ ( 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ TC ) @ ( 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ TB ) @ B )
      = B ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','thm/lists/ITLIST2_0') ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [TA: $tType,TB: $tType,TC: $tType,A: TC > TB > TA > TA,B: TA] :
        ( ( 'const/lists/ITLIST2' @ TC @ TB @ TA @ A @ ( 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ TC ) @ ( 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ TB ) @ B )
        = B ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ~ ! [TA: $tType,TB: $tType,TC: $tType,A: TC > TB > TA > TA,B: TA] :
        ( ( 'const/lists/ITLIST2' @ TC @ TB @ TA @ A @ ( 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ TC ) @ ( 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ TB ) @ B )
        = B ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ( ( 'const/lists/ITLIST2' @ skt1 @ skt2 @ skt3 @ sk1 @ ( 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ skt1 ) @ ( 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ skt2 ) @ sk2 )
   != sk2 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[4]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ( ( 'const/lists/ITLIST2' @ skt1 @ skt2 @ skt3 @ sk1 @ ( 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ skt1 ) @ ( 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ skt2 ) @ sk2 )
   != sk2 ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ! [TA: $tType,TB: $tType,C: skt3,B: 'type/ind_types/list' @ TB,A: TA > TB > skt3 > skt3] :
      ( ( C != sk2 )
      | ( ( 'const/lists/ITLIST2' @ TA @ TB @ skt3 @ A @ ( 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ TA ) @ B @ C )
       != ( 'const/lists/ITLIST2' @ skt1 @ skt2 @ skt3 @ sk1 @ ( 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ skt1 ) @ ( 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ skt2 ) @ sk2 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[9,6]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    sk2 != sk2,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[10:[bind(A,$thf( sk1 )),bind(B,$thf( 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ skt2 )),bind(C,$thf( sk2 )),bind_type(TA,$thf( skt1 )),bind_type(TB,$thf( skt2 ))]]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : DAT280^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.10/0.23  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.23  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.23  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.23  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.23  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.23  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.23  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.23  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 18:14:52 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.23  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.23  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.03/0.82  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.22/1.02  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (198ms). 
% 1.45/1.03  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.01/1.43  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.01/1.44  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.21/1.54  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 1 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.21/1.58  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 1 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.21/1.59  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.21/1.59  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.38/1.60  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.69/2.18  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.69/2.19  % Time passed: 1807ms (effective reasoning time: 1148ms)
% 3.69/2.19  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.69/2.19  % Axioms used in derivation (1): thm/lists/ITLIST2_DEF_0
% 3.69/2.19  % No. of inferences in proof: 12
% 3.69/2.19  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1807 ms resp. 1148 ms w/o parsing
% 3.84/2.25  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.84/2.25  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------