%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : DAT334^8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 07:48:16 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 3.44s 2.07s
% Output : Refutation 3.44s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 9 unt; 0 typ; 4 def)
% Number of atoms : 42 ( 4 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 80 ( 2 ~; 0 |; 7 &; 68 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 5 avg)
% Number of types : 3 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 6 ( 6 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 16 ( 14 usr; 8 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 23 ( 11 ^; 7 !; 5 ?; 23 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(mworld_type,type,
mworld: $tType ).
thf(mrel_decl,type,
mrel: mworld > mworld > $o ).
thf(mactual_decl,type,
mactual: mworld ).
thf(mlocal_decl,type,
mlocal: ( mworld > $o ) > $o ).
thf(mand_decl,type,
mand: ( mworld > $o ) > ( mworld > $o ) > mworld > $o ).
thf(mbox_decl,type,
mbox: ( mworld > $o ) > mworld > $o ).
thf(eiw_di_decl,type,
eiw_di: $i > mworld > $o ).
thf(mexists_di_decl,type,
mexists_di: ( $i > mworld > $o ) > mworld > $o ).
thf(cs_decl,type,
cs: $i ).
thf(sue_decl,type,
sue: $i ).
thf(mary_decl,type,
mary: $i ).
thf(john_decl,type,
john: $i ).
thf(math_decl,type,
math: $i ).
thf(psych_decl,type,
psych: $i ).
thf(teach_decl,type,
teach: $i > $i > mworld > $o ).
thf(mlocal_def,definition,
( mlocal
= ( ^ [A: mworld > $o] : ( A @ mactual ) ) ) ).
thf(mand_def,definition,
( mand
= ( ^ [A: mworld > $o,B: mworld > $o,C: mworld] :
( ( A @ C )
& ( B @ C ) ) ) ) ).
thf(mbox_def,definition,
( mbox
= ( ^ [A: mworld > $o,B: mworld] :
! [C: mworld] :
( ( mrel @ B @ C )
=> ( A @ C ) ) ) ) ).
thf(mexists_di_def,definition,
( mexists_di
= ( ^ [A: $i > mworld > $o,B: mworld] :
? [C: $i] :
( ( eiw_di @ C @ B )
& ( A @ C @ B ) ) ) ) ).
thf(1,conjecture,
( mlocal
@ ( mbox
@ ( mexists_di
@ ^ [A: $i] : ( teach @ A @ cs ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mlocal
@ ( mbox
@ ( mexists_di
@ ^ [A: $i] : ( teach @ A @ cs ) ) ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(6,plain,
~ ! [A: mworld] :
( ( mrel @ mactual @ A )
=> ? [B: $i] :
( ( eiw_di @ B @ A )
& ( teach @ B @ cs @ A ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [A: mworld] : ( mrel @ A @ A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mrel_reflexive) ).
thf(10,plain,
! [A: mworld] : ( mrel @ A @ A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
! [A: mworld] :
? [B: $i] : ( eiw_di @ B @ A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',eiw_di_nonempty) ).
thf(12,plain,
! [A: mworld] :
? [B: $i] : ( eiw_di @ B @ A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(5,axiom,
( mlocal
@ ( mbox
@ ( mand @ ( teach @ john @ math )
@ ( mand
@ ( mexists_di
@ ^ [A: $i] : ( teach @ A @ cs ) )
@ ( mand @ ( teach @ mary @ psych ) @ ( teach @ sue @ psych ) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',db) ).
thf(14,plain,
! [A: mworld] :
( ( mrel @ mactual @ A )
=> ( ( teach @ john @ math @ A )
& ? [B: $i] :
( ( eiw_di @ B @ A )
& ( teach @ B @ cs @ A ) )
& ( teach @ mary @ psych @ A )
& ( teach @ sue @ psych @ A ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(21,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[6,10,12,14]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : DAT334^8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.11/0.21 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.21 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.21 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.21 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.21 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.21 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.21 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.21 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 18:27:54 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.21 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.21 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.84/0.77 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.17/0.98 % [INFO] Parsing done (206ms).
% 1.17/0.99 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 1.85/1.38 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 1.85/1.39 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 2.21/1.51 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 3 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 2.21/1.54 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 3 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 2.21/1.55 % [INFO] Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF).
% 2.21/1.55 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 2.21/1.56 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 3.44/2.07 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.44/2.07 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 3.44/2.07 % Time passed: 1730ms (effective reasoning time: 1070ms)
% 3.44/2.07 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.44/2.07 % Axioms used in derivation (3): mrel_reflexive, eiw_di_nonempty, db
% 3.44/2.07 % No. of inferences in proof: 10
% 3.44/2.07 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1730 ms resp. 1070 ms w/o parsing
% 3.44/2.12 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.44/2.12 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------